「endpoint」の検索結果

Guide for upgrading Stripe API versions, webhook endpoints, server-side SDKs, Stripe.js, and mobile SDKs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce XQUIC test coverage and local validation gates. Use when code, build, or test changes need verification; before commit or pull request; or when asked to build, test, validate, or verify XQUIC. Requires paired happy-path and abnormal-path unit tests, the complete local unit suite, and explicit endpoint coverage or gap reporting for production behavior changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emulated AWS cloud services (S3, SQS, IAM, STS) for local development and testing. Use when the user needs to interact with AWS API endpoints locally, test S3 bucket and object operations, emulate SQS queues and messages, manage IAM users/roles/access keys, test STS assume role, or work without hitting real AWS APIs. Triggers include "AWS emulator", "emulate AWS", "mock S3", "local SQS", "test IAM", "emulate S3", "AWS locally", "STS assume role", or any task requiring local AWS service emulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and share third-party HTTP API emulators with emulate. Use to emulate an external provider, add a custom service plugin, model stateful vendor endpoints, configure custom seeds, or package an emulator. For an existing built-in service, use that service's skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emulated Vercel REST API for local development and testing. Use when the user needs to interact with Vercel API endpoints locally, test Vercel integrations, emulate projects/deployments/domains, set up Vercel OAuth flows, manage environment variables, create API keys, configure protection bypass, emulate Vercel Blob storage, or test without hitting the real Vercel API. Triggers include "Vercel API", "emulate Vercel", "mock Vercel", "test Vercel OAuth", "Vercel integration", "Vercel Blob", "local Vercel", or any task requiring a local Vercel API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emulated Slack API for local development and testing. Use when the user needs to interact with Slack API endpoints locally, test Slack integrations, emulate channels/messages/users/views, set up Slack OAuth flows, test incoming webhooks, or work with the Slack Web API without hitting the real Slack API. Triggers include "Slack API", "emulate Slack", "mock Slack", "test Slack OAuth", "Slack bot", "Slack views", "incoming webhook", "local Slack", or any task requiring a local Slack API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emulated GitHub REST API for local development and testing. Use when the user needs to interact with GitHub API endpoints locally, test GitHub integrations, emulate repos/issues/PRs, set up GitHub OAuth flows, configure GitHub Apps, test webhooks, or work with actions/checks without hitting the real GitHub API. Triggers include "GitHub API", "emulate GitHub", "mock GitHub", "test GitHub OAuth", "GitHub App JWT", "local GitHub", or any task requiring a local GitHub API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure HTTP/SSE transport for web-based MCP servers with proper endpoints, authentication, and CORS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WooYun business logic vulnerability methodology — 22,132 real cases across 6 domains (authentication bypass, authorization bypass, payment tampering, information disclosure, logic flaws, misconfiguration) and 33 vulnerability classes. Use for ANY security testing, auditing, or code review of web apps, APIs, or business systems — even without explicit "security" keywords. Triggers: penetration testing, security audit, vulnerability, bug bounty, payment security, IDOR, password reset, weak credentials, unauthorized access, race condition, parameter tampering, code review, 渗透测试, 安全审计, 漏洞挖掘, 支付安全, 越权, 逻辑漏洞, 业务安全, SRC, 代码审计. Also triggers on implicit intent: "test this endpoint", "find bugs", "can I bypass this", "帮我测测这个接口", "这个参数能不能改", "帮我找bug".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect and provision enterprise Azure infrastructure from workload descriptions. For cloud architects and platform engineers planning networking, identity, security, compliance, and multi-resource topologies with WAF alignment. Generates Bicep or Terraform directly (no azd). WHEN: 'plan Azure infrastructure', 'architect Azure landing zone', 'design hub-spoke network', 'plan multi-region DR topology', 'set up VNets firewalls and private endpoints', 'subscription-scope Bicep deployment', 'Azure Backup for VM workloads'. PREFER azure-prepare FOR app-centric workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulls Bigdata.com (RavenPack) financial and news data via the official bigdata-client SDK and /v1/* REST endpoints — structured financials, prices, analyst estimates, entity-sentiment series, annotated chunk search, screener. Use when the Bigdata MCP's tearsheets/search feel thin and you need the machine-readable substrate: mentions of Bigdata.com, RavenPack, a bd_v2_ key, rp_entity_id, or chunk/query_unit cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests/benchmarks a third-party LLM endpoint (OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible): availability, fidelity, speed, concurrency, protocol compliance, quality regression. Use before hand-rolling a curl loop, when onboarding a provider, or debugging "system prompt 不生效" / a tok/s claim — 测评/压测一个模型或渠道. Not for TTS/voice-clone supplier eval (use the audio skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch live cryptocurrency prices with zero API keys — CoinGecko's public endpoints primary, Coinbase spot fallback, via plain curl. Use when asked what's bitcoin at, ETH price in euros, how's the crypto market today, or price of some altcoin. Produces the current price with 24h context, the source and timestamp, the rerunnable command, and the volatility caveat that crypto answers must carry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish 'how to work with me' as a literal API spec — endpoints (what to ask me for and what you'll get back), rate limits (meeting and interrupt tolerance), error codes (what happens when you surprise me Friday 5pm), auth (how to earn trust), and a changelog. Use when onboarding to a new team, when a new manager or report arrives, for a team working-styles session, or 'write my README/user manual'. Produces a personal API spec that's genuinely funny and secretly the best onboarding doc on the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove video backgrounds with VEED's direct developer API: standard, fast and green-screen endpoints. Trigger phrases: veed, remove video background, background removal, transparent video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backend specialist for APIs, databases, authentication with clean architecture (Repository/Service/Router pattern). Use for API, endpoint, REST, database, server, migration, and auth work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on user-supplied identifiers. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/idor-results.md. Use when asked to find IDOR or authorization bypass bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed WooCommerce code — extensions, payment and shipping integrations, checkout customizations, and order/product logic — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WooCommerce APIs: wc_get_order, wc_get_orders, wc_get_product, WC() cart or session, woocommerce_* hooks, Store API endpoints, payment gateways, order or product meta, HPOS, subscriptions, or bookings. Use on 'review this Woo plugin', 'is this HPOS compatible', or after tasks like 'write a WooCommerce extension', 'add a checkout field', 'hook into the order flow', or 'update stock'. Enforces HPOS-safe order access, CRUD over direct meta, feature-compatibility declarations, server-side checkout validation, money-handling discipline, and hooks over template overrides. DO NOT USE for WordPress code without WooCommerce APIs (use wp-guard), generic code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), or store configuration and admin-screen questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Fabric Warehouse, Lakehouse SQL endpoints, and Mirrored Databases: DDL/DML, COPY INTO, read-only T-SQL, Query Insights diagnostics, and Capacity Metrics CU-spike correlation. Synapse migration target SQL belongs to synapse-migration; Fabric SQL database belongs to sqldb-cli. Triggers: query warehouse, create warehouse table, failed or canceled query, CU spike, Capacity Metrics app, custom SQL pool, Lakehouse table health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。