940 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any domain's AI-readiness by using curl to directly probe robots.txt, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt, then scores each file against a structured checklist and delivers a formatted report with pass/warn/fail findings and actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever a user provides a domain or URL and wants to know if llms.txt or llms-full.txt is available, discoverable, or properly structured. Trigger on phrases like "check llms.txt for", "does this site have llms.txt", "find llms.txt", "check llms for this url", "audit llms.txt", "is llms-full.txt available", or any time a user shares a domain/docs URL and wants AI-readiness checked. Also trigger when the user wants to verify GEO/AEO readiness of a documentation site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holistic state-of-the-project check covering unmerged branches, stalled PRs, failed GitHub Actions, stale builds, plan drift (TODOS.md / ROADMAP), unreleased commits, and log errors. Runs read-only investigation, presents a grouped checklist, fixes only after explicit user confirmation. Aware of the Cathier iOS app workflow (Xcode + fastlane + auto-merge @claude PRs from in-app feedback).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize a site or app for SEO, AI-bot search and app-store search in one run: detect web vs store, run each audit once, merge one prioritized report; fixes only via member gates. Don't use for one fix (seo-ai-optimizer, aso-marketing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a product codebase and landing page against 32 viral principles and produce a Virality Score plus ranked fixes. Use to audit virality or prioritize growth. Don't use for SEO, ASO, copywriting, or code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize websites for technical SEO, content SEO, and AI bot accessibility. Fixes meta tags, sitemaps, robots.txt, structured data, llms.txt, and GPTBot/ClaudeBot directives. Don't use for App Store ASO, paid search, or blog writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a site for agent readiness via isitagentready.com — for 'make this site agent-ready' or 'scan this site', incl. localhost. Plans the 0-5 gaps and files issues via /plan-to-issues. Not for SEO/llms.txt fixes or app-store ASO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize a website or app design in one run: capture the page once, audit usability, UX/AX, virality and agent readiness, merge overlaps into one prioritized report, apply fixes on opt-in. Don't use for one lens (dont-make-me-think, ux-ax-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned launch-appeal grader for public pages. Grades findability, first-screen clarity, CTA pull, proof quality, design signal, and AI citation readiness. Use when a public page needs a fast A-F visibility grade before or after launch. NOT FOR: the deep nine-lane SEO audit with rewrite fixes (use suede-seo-audit); implementing conversion changes (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by AI answer engines (use suede-ai-seo).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned SEO and generative-search audit discipline. Runs a nine-lane evidence-based audit: access, intent, metadata, structure, supported schema, E-E-A-T, clusters, and exact rewrite fixes. Use when a page or site needs a deep standalone SEO/AI-visibility audit with scored lanes. NOT FOR: a fast A-F launch-appeal grade (use suede-visibility-grader); conversion-path rework after the audit (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews (use suede-ai-seo).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse git history and produce or update a CHANGELOG.md following the Keep a Changelog convention. Supports Conventional Commits, basic prefix conventions, and unstructured commit messages. Intelligently categorizes changes, detects breaking changes, links to PRs/issues, and handles both initial generation and incremental updates. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User asks to "generate", "create", "update", or "write" a changelog - User mentions "CHANGELOG", "changelog", "release notes" - User says "document changes", "what changed since last release" - User wants to "prepare a release" and needs a changelog entry - User asks to "clean up" or "reformat" an existing changelog **Covers:** Any git-based project. Handles Conventional Commits (feat/fix/chore), Angular convention, basic prefixes (Add/Fix/Remove), and freeform commit messages. Outputs Keep a Changelog format with optional Common Changelog enhancements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The single config quality skill. Two modes: (1) Default — review/wire pending self-improvement proposals. (2) Audit — analyzes skills, rules, CLAUDE.md, project refs, hooks, and agents against the actual codebase to find inaccuracies, trigger overlaps, stale references, and weak rules, then fixes them. Trigger on 'self-evolve', 'evolve', 'config health check', 'audit config', 'check claude setup', 'apply this rule', 'reorganize rules', 'ok' (when proposals are pending). NOT for improving individual skills (use skill-creator), diagnosing code bugs (use diagnose), or fixing broken code (use fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative review-fix loop for the current branch — reviews via daemon, fixes inline, re-reviews until passing or max iterations reached
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrates Neo4j driver code and Cypher queries from older versions (4.x, 5.x) to current (2025.x/2026.x, Cypher 25). Covers Python, JavaScript/Node.js, Java, .NET, and Go drivers — package renames, removed APIs, version requirements, diff-ready fixes. Also handles Cypher syntax migration — QPE paths, CALL subqueries, id() → elementId(), PERIODIC COMMIT → CALL IN TRANSACTIONS, and all Cypher 25 removals. Does NOT write new Cypher queries — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT cover DB administration or server ops — use neo4j-cli-tools-skill. Does NOT provision new Neo4j instances — use neo4j-getting-started-skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate any agent skill against a merged framework — Anthropic's Claude Code best practices plus Matt Pocock's writing-great-skills methodology — across 4 axes (Trigger, Structure, Steering, Pruning). Produces an evidence-cited scorecard (0–100), a weighted overall score, and diagnosed failure modes with prioritized fixes. Use when the user asks to evaluate, rate, or audit a skill ("evaluate this skill", "skill scorecard", "review SKILL.md"), or to compare two skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose bounded implementation scope and existing owning modules before Guardrails runtime, configuration, client, resource, streaming, Agents, or SDK compatibility changes and feedback fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The definition of done. Run before calling any change done, fixed, verified, ready or shippable, for features and bug fixes alike. Checks the pre-mortem was answered, proves the tests fail on the old code, gets a fresh breaker review, runs CI's own checks in a clean checkout, checks the user-facing words, and writes the evidence report. Also use when asked "is it done", "is it ready", "did you verify it" or "can we merge".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。