「gate」の検索結果

Prepares pull requests by running quality gates, drafting descriptions, and validating tests. Use when completing a feature and ready for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes implementation plans with progress tracking, checkpoint validation, and quality gates. Use after planning is complete and tasks are ready to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures pre-commit hooks for linting, type checking, formatting, and testing. Use when setting up a new project or adding quality gates to an existing one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bind loop 'done' to unfakeable gates. Use to harden egregore/herald loops or promote completion_integrity. Not for QA gates; use night-market-validation-and-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous sub-agent hand-off for a fiddly, fully-specified exploit-compile / escalation RUN - the main agent stays on strategy and the board while a cheap sub-agent runs an exact copy-paste checklist behind a false-root/hostname guardrail. Use for "delegate", "offload", "hand this to a sub-agent", "spin a haiku", or the moment a foothold plus a working escalation vector is identified. Main agent dispatches, waits (no parallel duplicate), integrates the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managing consent for analytics cookies and implementing privacy-preserving measurement. Covers GA4 privacy configuration, consent mode fallback behavior, aggregate reporting alternatives, and cookieless measurement approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Records of Processing Activities automatically from IT system inventories including Active Directory, cloud service catalogs, API gateway logs, and database schemas. Covers automated field population, data flow discovery, and system-to-RoPA mapping. Activate for automated RoPA, system inventory, data discovery, auto-population, IT-driven records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment privacy compliance checklist for AI/ML systems covering DPIA completion, lawful basis verification, transparency notices, human oversight mechanisms, bias testing, and post-deployment monitoring setup. Keywords: AI deployment, privacy checklist, go-live, model deployment, compliance gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building Spring Cloud Gateway 5 on Spring Boot 4, including WebFlux or Web MVC routes, edge authentication, trusted headers, rate limits, timeouts, and resilience. Do not use for ordinary outbound HTTP clients or domain orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or changing a Spring Cloud Gateway on Spring Boot 3. Covers route design, authentication, header hygiene, rate limiting, retries, timeouts, observability, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy containers on ECS and Fargate. Configure task definitions, services, and load balancing. Use when running containerized workloads on AWS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Aider (`aider`) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture structured feedback on the Han skills and agents used in the current session and optionally post it as a GitHub issue to testdouble/han. Use at the end of any session where one or more han-* skills or agents ran, to rate a run, log what worked and what didn't, or submit observations for maintainers. Does not review code, investigate bugs, or research options; use code-review, investigate, or research for those. Does not provide feedback on skills or agents from non-Han plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO pages that rank on Google AND get cited by LLMs. Uses live SERP data, 500-token chunk architecture, RAG optimization for Gemini 3.5 Flash, the Two-Gate AEO framework (retrieval-pool entry + selected-citation extraction), the Anti-NLP Stuffing Protocol (structural entity placement, no keyword-density stuffing), strict single-service local isolation, and the Reddit Test quality gate. Triggers on: "write an SEO page", "seo-agi", "seo page for [keyword]", "rank for [keyword]", "rewrite this page for SEO", "GEO", "AEO", "write a page that ranks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic case investigation with evidence-graded findings, calibrated to the input. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, trace what caused an incident, walk through unfamiliar code, or build a mental model of a code area before working on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate bounded tasks to Grok Build from a supervising agent such as Codex. Use when the user asks Grok to investigate, review, implement, or provide another perspective, or when a distinct coding agent would materially help. Includes a background ACP client for progress, follow-up prompts, permissions, and cancellation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Go concurrency - sync primitives, channel semantics, the select statement, and the standard channel patterns (cancellation/done-channel, fan-out/fan-in, pipeline, or-done, context, worker-pool). Use when writing or reviewing Go that spawns goroutines, shares state, or coordinates over channels, even if the user never says "concurrency" - e.g. data races, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, sync/context/select usage, or "make this parallel". Distilled from luk4z7/go-concurrency-guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。