「human review」の検索結果

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: writing or reviewing cover letters, recruiter email replies, LinkedIn outreach, or interview follow-ups. Removes AI-template patterns and writes with a specific, confident, human voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill dashboard for a revenue-based-financing (RBF) fund or private-credit book of many small SME contracts. Use when the user invokes $kelly-portfolio-health or /kelly-portfolio-health, wants to check portfolio health, AUM, repayment progress, concentration risk, or a watchlist of contracts with declining revenue. Human actions (flag a contract for review, clear a flag, leave a note) write directly onto the contract's own Busabase record — this skill never moves money or changes contract terms. Generic and brand-free — not tied to any specific company or fund.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill dashboard for a shared LLM gateway's cost and model governance — daily spend trend, cost breakdown by service/model, a canary-rollout status board, and a deterministic cost/error anomaly list. Use when the user invokes $kelly-llm-gateway or /kelly-llm-gateway, or wants to review LLM gateway spend, model routing, canary rollouts, rollback readiness, or cost/error anomalies for services routed through one shared gateway to multiple LLM providers/models. Human actions (promote/rollback/hold a rollout, acknowledge an anomaly) write directly onto the route's own Busabase record — this skill never changes a real routing config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Busabase-backed sandbox desk for scoring and triaging course-instructor ("讲师") candidates found on a recruiting-style platform. Use whenever the user invokes $kelly-instructor-sourcing or /kelly-instructor-sourcing, wants a lightweight instructor candidate tracker, needs to score sourcing-platform leads against a three-axis rubric (background endorsement, expertise depth/breadth, teaching-service ability) before reaching out, or wants to log a WeChat add without building a live-connected outreach tool. Three subcommands - setup, criteria, review - plus the desk itself. v1 is sandbox-only — every dataset is deterministic mock data, it never connects to a real sourcing-platform or messaging account, and it never sends a message or automates a WeChat add - that stays entirely human-performed outside the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select an evidence-backed platform delivery profile, preserve organic and ads scope boundaries, and produce safe-zone QA input with an explicit human preview gate when evidence is unknown or stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the frontend phase after the API contract exists — deciding the screens as units of work (one job a person finishes in one go, per actor of the event timeline), collecting the views and commands each screen needs, keeping the screen map in frontend/README.md, building against the Lean CLI, then handing over to frontend-ux-review and the human screen check. Not for the spec-animation mockup (domain-mockup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when it is time to make the backend follow the Lean model — regenerate Kotlin from Lean, implement the generated interfaces (UseCase, QueryService, Repository, Entity), wire every generated contract test, make the build green, then run the design and SQL reviews. Backend comes after the human confirmed the screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, provider-neutral SDD Composy correction loop on one approved task (EXECUTE, QA, EVIDENCE, REVIEW, VERIFY; at most 3 iterations) with explicit approval, safe-stop guards, and fresh verification. Use to continue an approved TASK autonomously — 'rodar o loop na TASK-003', 'continuar a task até passar', 'start a loop on task 4'. Do NOT use for the host's recurring loop runner, for fleets (sdd-fleet), or for a task without human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check an externally created PR for coding rule violations against memory/INDEX.md atoms and docs/architecture/code-review-rules.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily per-section review cycle driving a section toward the smallest, clearest form that still does everything it does today. Selects its section live each run (scripted), inventories every file, derives the target shape before any scan, works parallel reading threads into one ranked list and strikes it on a 2-3h budget. One PR per run; each run's report and Needs-Peter queue live in its own docs/health/runs/ file; 'resume' applies Peter's answers later. Use for the morning section-improvement run, 'doctor <section>', or 'run section doctor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs Rust command-line interfaces that are reliable for agents, scripts, and humans. Use when building or reviewing Rust binaries, clap command trees, diagnostics commands, codegen tools, or automation-facing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover failure modes in Coval runs, uploaded conversations or local conversation exports using scoped sampling and transcript, audio and trace evidence. Prepare human review without inventing ground truth or launching new runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate one Coval judge against independent human labels, with grouped development/test separation, class-specific errors and uncertainty. Use for trust claims or calibration; without real labels, prepare review rather than inventing ground truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze development-set disagreements between human annotations and one Coval text LLM judge, then propose a focused prompt revision. Use coval-calibrate-metric for independent trust measurements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apple Human Interface Guidelines for iPhone. Use when building, reviewing, or refactoring SwiftUI/UIKit interfaces for iOS. Triggers on tasks involving iPhone UI, iOS components, accessibility, Dynamic Type, Dark Mode, or HIG compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinator workflow for orchestrating dockeragents through fix-review-iterate-present loop. Use when delegating any task that produces code changes. Ensures agents achieve 10/10 quality before presenting to human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。