3,073 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
First-tier tech company P8 capability advisor for evaluating, coaching, and giving career advice against a P8 senior expert, architect, or domain-owner profile. Use when the user asks for P8-level assessment, promotion readiness, capability gaps, project or resume review, interview preparation, or growth advice based on first-tier tech company P8 expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-tier tech company P9 capability advisor for evaluating, coaching, and giving career advice against a P9 senior expert, director, or business/organization-level leader profile. Use when the user asks for P9-level assessment, promotion readiness, executive capability gaps, strategic project review, resume positioning, interview preparation, or growth advice based on first-tier tech company P9 expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write SEO-optimized affiliate blog articles, product reviews, comparison posts, listicles, and how-to guides. Triggers on: "write a blog post about", "review of [product]", "best [category] article", "comparison blog", "affiliate blog", "SEO article", "write a review", "product roundup", "blog content for affiliate", "how to use [product] blog post", "listicle about [category]", "[product] vs [product] blog", "content for my affiliate site".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TripAdvisor Content API for hotel ratings, restaurant search, attraction reviews, rankings, and nearby locations. Use when evaluating hotels or researching destinations. 5K calls/month.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute long-running tasks in background isolates to keep the UI responsive. Use when performing heavy computations, parsing large datasets, or choosing between async/await and isolates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
统计与机器学习异常值检测工具。读取结构化表格数据，使用 IQR、Z-score、IsolationForest 或分组标准差一致性方法识别异常值，输出带异常标记、删除异常行或裁剪异常值后的结果文件。 当用户提到异常值检测、离群值识别、IQR、Z-score、IsolationForest、按实验组/分类组检查数值一致性等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出“statistical_outlier_detector”，只要任务涉及结构化数值字段异常识别或分组均值标准差一致性检查，就应该使用此skill。 不负责字段固定阈值上下限校验、枚举值校验、时间序列缺失/频率校验或格式转换。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Context Isolation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable Functions, bindings, or host configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an engineering review report rather than an interactive ADR discovery. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design or review WireMock stubs (JSON mappings or Java DSL); Improve request matching, isolation, or reset strategy for HTTP mocks; Add or fix verification of outbound HTTP calls to a WireMock server; Debug flaky tests involving WireMock or unmatched request journals. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to verify Java performance optimizations by comparing profiling results before and after refactoring — including baseline validation, post-refactoring report generation, quantitative before/after metrics comparison, side-by-side flamegraph analysis, regression detection, or creating profiling-comparison-analysis and profiling-final-results documentation. This should trigger for requests such as Verify performance fix; Verify the performance; Verify the memory; Verify the threading; Compare before and after profiling results; Check for performance regressions after refactoring. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to write or improve integration tests for Quarkus — including @QuarkusTest, Dev Services for automatic container provisioning, Testcontainers via QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager, WireMock for external HTTP stubs, @QuarkusIntegrationTest for black-box testing against packaged artifacts, REST Assured, data isolation strategies (@TestTransaction vs @BeforeEach cleanup), and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split (*Test, *IT, *AT). This should trigger for requests such as Add or improve integration tests in a Quarkus project; Configure Testcontainers or Dev Services for Quarkus tests; Add WireMock stubs for external HTTP dependencies in Quarkus integration tests; Set up @QuarkusIntegrationTest for packaged artifact or native binary testing; Fix test data isolation or configure Maven Surefire/Failsafe split. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory rules for agents in git worktree isolation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advisor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger for: Other Transaction or OT should-cost, cost estimate, cost-share analysis, milestone pricing, funding profile, proposed-price comparison, prototype price analysis, research OT budget, production follow-on OT estimate, or OT price-reasonableness support under 10 U.S.C. 4021 or 4022. Build auditable milestone-based .xlsx workbooks using BLS OEWS wages, CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem, materials, cost sharing, and agreement-specific fees. Use for pre-solicitation budgets and proposal comparisons. Do NOT use for FAR-based IGCEs, OT project descriptions, grants, or an Agreements Officer's determination. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and, when travel applies, gsa-perdiem MCP servers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。