1,142 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run /sync as the last step after a change is complete, around merge, to keep durable knowledge current. Updates root and nested AGENTS.md, reconciles the scope from repo evidence, and flags specs the change made stale. Surgical edits only: it adds lines, and rewrites single lines it owns. Never a whole section, never curated prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes or restructures CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md with progressive disclosure and zero information loss. Use when the user asks to optimize, audit, 精简/瘦身/重构, or split instruction files, asks for their best practices (最佳实践), sees Memory files taking a large share of /context, reports rules in instruction files being ignored, or a task starts moving instruction sections. Not for generic task drift unless instruction files are in scope; not for moving memory entries into docs (use claude-code-ops-router).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn one piece of content into a full multi-platform pack — X/Twitter thread, LinkedIn post, newsletter section, Instagram carousel, and a short-form video script — each rewritten natively for its platform, not copy-pasted. Use when asked to repurpose content, atomize a blog post or video, turn one idea into many posts, or get more mileage from a piece. Produces ready-to-post drafts per platform with hooks, formatting, and CTAs tuned to each.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 帮我写开题报告, 开题答辩怎么准备, 文献综述怎么写, 技术路线图, 研究内容和创新点, or write a thesis proposal for a Chinese university. Produces a 开题报告 in the section order Chinese universities use (选题背景与意义, 国内外研究现状, 研究内容与目标, 研究方法与技术路线, 创新点, 研究基础, 进度安排, 预期成果, 参考文献), a literature review plan, a technical route diagram in text, and the questions the 开题答辩 panel is likely to ask.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to compare two annual reports, put two companies from the same sector side by side, or check whether two companies' adjusted numbers mean the same thing. Takes two uploaded annual reports from one sector and compares them on five ratios computed with identical definitions from audited figures, flagging every place the companies define a metric differently. Produces a page-referenced comparison table, a definitions-differ section (adjusted vs statutory, inside vs outside the audited statements), and three questions to ask before believing either company's highlights. Educational, not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a git log, commit list, or release notes into a polished, user-facing changelog. Use when writing release notes, generating a CHANGELOG.md entry, or documenting what changed in a version. Produces a structured changelog section with version header, categorised changes, and migration notes. For an already-curated change list use changelog-writer instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a CV for someone moving into a new field, leading with transferable evidence instead of job titles that do not match. Use when asked to write a CV for a career change, I'm moving from teaching into product, how do I present my experience for a new industry, or my job titles don't fit the jobs I want. Produces a hybrid CV with a targeted summary and a relevant-skills section backed by achievements, a translation table from old-field language to new-field language, and an honest list of gaps with how to close them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an all-hands that lands with everyone from intern to VP — the mixed-altitude structure (the story for all, the numbers for some), the wins-with-names section done right, the hard-news slide handled straight, and the Q&A design that gets real questions. Use when asked build the all-hands deck, make the monthly town hall not boring, how do we share the numbers with everyone, or announce this change at all-hands. Produces the segment structure, the altitude-mixed content rules, the hard-news handling, and the Q&A mechanics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and remove AI slop — the generic, machine-default visual and copy tics of vibe-coded products — from a web project. Use when the user asks to "kill AI slop", "de-slop", "remove the AI look", "make this not look AI-generated", or clean up a landing page / UI / docs that feels templated. Detects and fixes the catalogue of tells: indigo→violet gradients, gradient-clip headlines, the default semantic palette, one-hue status boxes, atmospheric gradients, serif-italic emphasis, highlighted keywords, AI copywriting voice ("not just X — it's Y"), emoji everywhere, glowing status dots, wobbling spinners, colored-left-border callouts, pastel icon tiles, glassmorphism, over-rounding, oversized shadows, borders that die at corners, badge & pill spam, AI-drawn SVG icons, kickers over every heading, flat type hierarchies, invented stat rows, 01/02/03 section markers, cards nested in cards, the default Inter/Space Grotesk look, and more. Works on HTML/CSS, React/Vue/Svelte/Astro, Tailwind, PHP, and Markdown copy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive quiz tutor for Obsidian StudyVault learning. Use when the user wants to: (1) Take a diagnostic assessment of their knowledge, (2) Study or review specific sections/topics, (3) Drill weak areas identified in previous sessions, (4) Check their learning progress or dashboard, or says things like "quiz me", "test me", "let's study", "/tutor", "학습", "퀴즈", "평가".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write YouTube chapters from a transcript, validated against YouTube's own rules so they actually render. Use for "add chapters", "timestamps", "break this video into sections".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft replies to YouTube comments in the creator's voice, triaged by which ones are worth answering. Use for "reply to my comments", "handle the comment section", "someone asked X", or a pasted comment thread.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate competitive SEO content briefs with per-section word counts, competitor scoring, keyword density guidance, and page-type templates. Supports both new page briefs and improve-existing-page briefs. Use when user says "content brief", "write a brief", "content outline", "blog brief", "service page brief", "brief for", "writing brief", "content plan", or "outline for".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when cutting a modpack release. Creates <project>/docs/release-changelog.md if absent; appends a new version section with grouped changes. Triggers - 'cut a release', 'release notes', 'changelog', 'v1.2.3 changes', 'what changed since last version'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Anthropologist (AA) via the Research Exchange platform — section selection, anonymization, word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date (free-format accepted), DOIs, ORCID, ethics statement, and figure permissions/alt text. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand how American Anthropologist (AA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, the four-field editorial board, decision categories, and how section choice shapes the path. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting or navigating any American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript as the entry point. Routes to the right AA sub-skill based on lifecycle stage, subfield (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), and section type (Research Article, Vital Topics Forum, World/Public/Multimodal Anthropologies, Review Essay). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding what characterization and experimental detail an Advanced Materials manuscript must show to prove its structure–property claim, and what belongs in the Experimental Section and Supporting Information. Partitions and stress-tests methods; does not design figures or run analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when judging whether a research idea fits Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) and has the *surprising* theoretical insight ASQ demands. Sharpens the puzzle and the contribution claim; it does not design the study or write theory sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or auditing the related-work section of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — covering the multimedia literature spread across vision, audio/speech, language, HCI/QoE, and systems, handling arXiv-speed concurrency, keeping citations double-blind, and verifying that cited "ACM MM papers" are ACM MM and not ICMR, MMSys, CVPR, or TOMM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing an ACL submission before an ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering long/short paper page budgets, the mandatory Limitations section, Responsible NLP checklist, anonymized PDFs and supplements, preprint declarations, dual-submission rules, resubmission linking, and ARR desk-reject triggers on OpenReview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。