4,557 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a Semgrep security scan over a codebase: detects languages, selects rulesets, presents the plan for explicit approval, then runs every approved ruleset through scripts/run-scans.sh, which batches the semgrep processes and writes scans.json, and merges the output to SARIF. Supports two scan modes, "run all" for full ruleset coverage and "important only" for security findings at medium-to-high confidence and impact. Uses Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis when it is available. Use when asked to scan code for vulnerabilities, run a security audit with Semgrep, find bugs, or perform static analysis. For the same scan without the approval gate, use the /static-analysis:semgrep-scan workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated complete independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool, which aggregates their validated findings and prepares the canonical artifacts; then complete the same scan once. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan any agent skill for security risks before you install or use it. Powered by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI-Infra-Guard). 100% local static analysis — no file contents or credentials leave your device. Compatible with CodeBuddy, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, OpenClaw and more. Triggers on: `这个 skill 安全吗`, `skill 安全扫描`, `检查 skill 安全`, `audit skill`, `scan skill`, `check skill safety`, `analyze skill`, `inspect skill`, `verify skill`, `skill security`, `skill supply chain`. Do NOT trigger for general agent usage, full system health checks, project debugging, or normal development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update the guide's threat intelligence through AgentSec Triage, research new coding-agent and MCP security advisories, and synchronize the security feed. Use for threat database refreshes or mise a jour de la base de menaces, not repository security scans or Claude Code release tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security best practices for gh-aw workflows and Go code: template injection prevention, shell script security, supply chain hardening, and static analysis integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform vulnerability scanning", "scan networks for open ports", "assess web application security", "scan wireless networks", "detect malware", "check cloud security", or "evaluate system compliance". It provides comprehensive guidance on security scanning tools and methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan code for security issues: dependency vulnerabilities (npm/pip audit), secret leaks (regex and entropy analysis), and OWASP anti-patterns like SQL injection, XSS, or command injection. Use when the user mentions security scans, vulnerability detection, secret leaks, API keys, OWASP, npm audit, pip-audit, hardcoded passwords, or code security checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform cloud penetration testing", "assess Azure or AWS or GCP security", "enumerate cloud resources", "exploit cloud misconfigurations", "test O365 security", "extract secrets from cloud environments", or "audit cloud infrastructure". It provides comprehensive techniques for security assessment across major cloud platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dedicated security-audit route for OWASP-style risks, secret leaks, auth flaws, injection, unsafe input handling, SSRF/XSS, and sensitive-data exposure. Use instead of code-reviewer when the prompt explicitly asks for security, vulnerability, threat, auth, or OWASP review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Golang skills orchestrator — always active on any Golang coding, review, debug, or setup task. Reads the task context and loads the most relevant skills from samber/cc-skills-golang, often multiple at once: writing a gRPC service loads golang-grpc + golang-testing + golang-error-handling; debugging a panic loads golang-troubleshooting + golang-safety; auditing security loads golang-security + golang-lint + golang-safety. Also: disambiguates competing clusters when two skills seem to overlap (performance vs benchmark vs troubleshooting, samber/lo vs mo vs ro, DI cluster, safety vs security), and configures the project's agent-config file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, Cursor rules, or Copilot instructions) to force-trigger skills in a project (/golang-how-to configure).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Agent or automation safety risks: review prompt, tool, secret, dependency, destructive-action, and explicit local plugin risks before agent or code execution. Use when the user says: security-safety-review, security safety review, ai coding safety, agent safety review, prompt injection review, tool permission review, secret exposure review, destructive action review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an AWS Security Agent penetration test against a live web application — registers and verifies the target domain, exercises the supplied endpoints with the managed Security Agent service, and returns verified runtime findings. Use when the user asks to pentest, run a penetration test, test their app's attack surface, find runtime vulnerabilities, register or verify a target domain, or check pentest status / findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply security best practices for Apple Notes automation scripts. Trigger: "apple notes security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and apply AssemblyAI secret, region, consent, retention, deletion, and model-training controls. Use when reviewing security or regulated speech workflows. Trigger with "AssemblyAI security", "AssemblyAI privacy", or "data retention".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enterprise role-based access control for Apollo.io. Use when implementing team permissions, restricting data access, or setting up enterprise security controls. Trigger with phrases like "apollo rbac", "apollo permissions", "apollo roles", "apollo team access", "apollo enterprise security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and harden Algolia credentials, record exposure, index restrictions, and tenant search controls. Use when reviewing frontend keys, backend ACLs, key rotation, or data visibility. Trigger with "secure Algolia", "Algolia key audit", or "Algolia security review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Terminal security analysis for shell environments. This skill should be used when checking commands for supply-chain attacks before execution, scanning repositories for hidden content or config poisoning, scoring URLs for homograph attacks, setting up AI tool protection, inspecting Python package artifacts, governing untrusted tasks or Web3 commands, auditing browser extensions, creating provenance receipts, downloading and executing scripts safely, investigating why tirith blocked a command, managing trusted patterns, running security audits, configuring MCP gateway proxies, or working with threat intelligence databases. Also use when the user mentions "tirith", "pipe-to-shell", "homograph", "ANSI injection", "zero-width", "punycode", "terminal security", "shell hook", "cloaking detection", "supply chain attack", "bidi override", "invisible unicode", or "config poisoning". Even if the user does not explicitly name tirith, use this skill when they ask about protecting shell environments, intercepting dangerous commands, or hardening AI agent tool execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI/ML security playbook. Use when assessing model supply chain attacks (pickle RCE, poisoned weights), adversarial examples, model poisoning, model stealing, data privacy attacks (membership inference, model inversion), and autonomous agent security risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。