Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
8,146 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a swarm plan wave by wave with filesystem isolation via git worktrees. For each wave, main context decides the scenario recipe + implementation contract for every task, then spawns one swarm-worker per task in parallel. Each worker executes its recipe and reports JSON status. Worktree merge-audit verifies write-set discipline before changes land on main. Aborts remaining waves on any audit or task failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 10.6 — sync the project's execution roadmap (project.json → roadmap.path, default docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md) to the just-landed work. Flips the tasks named in workflow.json → roadmap_tasks[] from ⬜ to ✅ and promotes their epic headings ⬜→🟡→✅, preserving the standup parser format contract. On the epic track it appends instead — the epic's heading plus one row per slice — and stamps roadmap_epic back into the epic state. Also hosts the ad-hoc backfill that puts every epic already on disk onto the roadmap. Fail-open: never throws, no-ops when roadmap.path is unset/absent or no task matches, and never blocks a commit. Runs after /archive and before /memory-sync on every committing track.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose the next dependency-ready sprint from the ALREADY-DECOMPOSED roadmap — standup's active sibling. Reads docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md + the memory backlog, computes per-task readiness from the roadmap's machine-readable status, orders with roadmap-planner's graph engine, and emits a proposed task-set (sprint-plan manifest shape) with per-feature done-criteria, excluding unready tasks and naming their unmet prerequisite. PROPOSES ONLY — the human confirms/edits before /triage routes it (typically to the `power` track). Distinct from `sprint-plan`, which decomposes a fresh vision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only view of the execution roadmap. Lists every epic with its per-status tallies, nests the still-open rows beneath their epic, collapses wholly-finished epics into one rollup line, and closes by naming the next planned task in file order. Four verbs — `list` (the reader's view), `tasks` and `epics` (filterable row and epic queries), `next` (the first planned task). Invoke any time to see what is left to build. Not a workflow phase; never writes; never starts or commits work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify tasks marked [X] in tasks.md are implemented, not phantom completions (marked done but backed by missing or dead code).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify tasks marked [X] in tasks.md are implemented, not phantom completions (marked done but backed by missing or dead code).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project workflow for PRDs, task tracking, changelog sync, and documentation updates. Use for any non-trivial task that spans multiple steps, touches several files, changes architecture, or needs project tracking updates. Also activates with @update to sync task.md, changelog.md, and files.md after completing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project workflow for PRDs, task tracking, changelog sync, and documentation updates. Use for any non-trivial task that spans multiple steps, touches several files, changes architecture, or needs project tracking updates. Also activates with @update to sync task.md, changelog.md, and files.md after completing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute all tasks from the task breakdown to build the feature. Use after task generation to systematically implement the planned solution following TDD approach where applicable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose professional internal emails for coordination tasks like vendor quote requests, task delegation, and follow-up communications. Generates bilingual (JA/EN) email drafts with proper business tone. Use when user needs to draft internal emails for vendor RFQ forwarding, quote compilation requests, status updates, or task delegation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
設計書から実装タスクへの分解を行う。デフォルトで各タスクをGitHub Issueとして起票し(1タスク=1 Issue、詳細はIssue本文に集約、ラベルでフェーズ・ステータス管理)、ユーザーがファイル管理を明示した場合のみdocs/sdd/tasks/にファイル生成する。AIエージェント向けの具体的な実装指示やTDD手順を定義する。タスク計画フェーズのみを単独で実行する際に使用する。Do NOT use for SDDワークフロー全体の管理(sdd-documentationを使用すること)。
Analyze pi (coding-agent) session JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to explain slow or failed individual tasks, compare execution-path differences between agents or browser tools, and count tool calls and error types. Use this skill whenever users ask to analyze a pi session, explain why a task was slow or failed, compare two runs, investigate an error, locate the session corresponding to tasks.jsonl, inspect an agent execution path, count tool calls, analyze a run ID, or perform any forensic or retrospective analysis of JSONL under ~/.pi/agent/sessions/ or agent-home/.pi/agent/sessions/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when executing or resuming an approved plan from `dev/active/<task>/` or `.worktrees/<task>`, including phase commits, verification, PR creation, and handoff; not for plan authorship or review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns one meeting transcript or recap into a DRAFT action-items document (decisions, owned and dated action items with verbatim source quotes, open questions), a task list ready for the user to enter into their task tracker, and one DRAFT follow-up email per action owner, all returned in the chat for the user to store, create or send. Use when the user shares, names or points to a meeting transcript or recap and asks to "pull the action items from this transcript", "who owns what after today's call", "draft follow-up emails to each owner" or "turn this recap into tasks". Do not use for full minutes, use meeting-minutes-writer instead; a brief before a meeting is meeting-prep-onepager. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a detailed implementation plan before coding. Use when starting a new feature, multi-step refactor, or complex task. Invoked by saying "plan", "create a plan", or "plan this task".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。