7,363 件 ・ 関連度順
Activates on any Python task involving *.py files, uv, ruff, ty, pytest, or pyproject.toml — loads the shared Python 3.11+ standards and routes the task to the specialist skill that applies them: TDD, CLI, web, data, async, typing, packaging, publishing, documentation sites, test design, test-failure analysis, or stdlib-only constrained environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and refactor oversized or multi-domain skills. First determines whether splitting or references/ extraction is appropriate — then executes the correct action. Use when a skill exceeds token thresholds (SK006/SK007) or covers multiple independent domains. Performs candidate assessment before any structural changes; cohesive single-intent skills are redirected to references/ extraction instead of splitting. When splitting is warranted — domain analysis gate, split plan, new SKILL.md generation, validation, and backwards-compatible facade conversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous feature research and gap analysis. Use when starting /add-new-feature or analyzing existing architecture documents. Explores codebase patterns, identifies ambiguities, and produces feature-context-{slug}.md for orchestrator RT-ICA phase. Does NOT make technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SAM-style feature initiation workflow — discovery through codebase analysis, architecture spec, task decomposition, validation, and context manifest. Use when a user asks to add a feature, plan a feature, or convert an idea into an executable SAM plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Local codebase analysis research angle — derives behavioral contracts, coding conventions, SKILL.md flow insertion points, and agent data availability maps from actual source files. Use when the blocking question is answered by reading the repository: what does this function actually do, what pattern does the codebase use for X, where in this workflow does a new step go, or what data does this agent already have.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Development harness plugin documentation index. Use when looking up SAM pipeline, backlog lifecycle, SDLC layers, task/plan schema, plan artifacts, quality gates, impact analysis, or dispatch schema documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when extracting specific data points from large agent output transcripts, kaizen analysis reports, or JSONL session files — tool timings, query counts, error summaries, or any structured facts — without loading raw data into orchestrator context. Activates when the orchestrator needs targeted facts from large files and context pollution must be avoided.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modern Git workflows, best practices, and commands. Use when the user asks about Git branch management (git switch vs checkout), file restoration (git restore), fixup commits, autosquash rebasing, git worktrees, rerere, force-with-lease, repository cleanup (git clean, stale branches, bloat analysis), history navigation (revision syntax, range notation, pickaxe search), recommended global git config, or GitButler and the but CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git repository history to produce a codebase risk profile before code review. Probes repo size, runs 7 parallel git analysis pipelines (hotspots, bug magnets, bus factor, contributor momentum, firefighting frequency, newly added files), cross-references hotspots with bug magnets to identify high-risk files with primary owner annotation, and writes walkthrough/recon-report.md. Use before code review to prioritize reviewer attention, at the start of linear-walkthrough Phase 1 Discovery to weight file coverage, or when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds or audits a research-project repository organized around its source library (original PDFs, tracked Markdown conversions, drop zone, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders the project type needs. Use when starting, structuring, or auditing a research repo or its sources folder. Single-PDF intake goes to process-source, replication packages to replication-package.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into analysis-ready long-format data: implementation identification, reshaping, choice-profile alignment, reference categories, and pilot exclusion. Use when a conjoint CSV needs cleaning, reshaping, or debugging before AMCE estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into an analysis-ready long-format dataset, covering export settings, identifying the implementation, package or manual wide-to-long reshaping, choice-profile alignment, ratings, reference categories, pilot exclusion, and subgroup merges. Use when the user has a conjoint CSV to clean, reshape, or debug, cannot align choices with profiles, or asks what the data must look like before AMCE estimation. Design goes to conjoint-design, validity review to conjoint-diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design integrity, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation, including the guardrail against reading an AMCE as majority preference. Use when the user asks whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, has referee comments on a conjoint, or wants a second opinion on estimation or interpretation. New designs go to conjoint-design, reshaping to conjoint-cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection: registry choice (OSF, AEA, AsPredicted, registered reports), locked models and decision rules, code run on simulated data, contingencies, and deviation records. Use when drafting or auditing a pre-registration or PAP, choosing a registry, or handling a deviation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold or audit a research-project repository organized around its source library (PDFs, Markdown conversions, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders it needs. Use when starting or auditing a research repo. Not for one-PDF intake or publication replication packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-country survey experiments: case selection, localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when fielding the same experiment in several countries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。