「sel」の検索結果

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a competitive or casual trading card game deck. Covers archetype selection, mana/energy curve analysis, win condition identification, meta-game positioning, and sideboard construction for Pokemon TCG, Magic: The Gathering, Flesh and Blood, and other TCGs. Use when building a new deck for a tournament format or casual play, adapting an existing deck to a changed meta-game, evaluating whether a new set warrants a deck change, or converting a deck concept into a tournament-ready list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI relational calibration — reading and adapting to the specific person you are working with. Goes beyond user-intent alignment (solving the right problem) to genuine attunement (meeting the person where they are). Maps communication style, expertise depth, emotional register, and implicit preferences from conversational evidence. Use at the start of a new session, when communication feels mismatched, after receiving unexpected feedback, or when transitioning between very different users or contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically identify whether a GPU kernel is compute-bound, memory-bound, or latency-bound using roofline analysis, occupancy calculations, compute/load ratio per tile, and SASS instruction inspection. Produces a decision matrix for optimization strategy selection (cp.async, warp interleaving, tiling, double-buffering, or CuAssembler hand-tuning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show the latest or selected plugin-managed Kimi job for the current repository. Use when the user explicitly asks for Kimi job status or progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Return the stored rendered result for the latest or selected terminal Kimi job. Use when the user explicitly asks for a Kimi job result or artifact body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List configured models, guide provider setup, verify local Kimi companion readiness, and manage the PreToolUse hook plus optional review gate. Use when asked about available models, subscription/API-key setup, default selection, or explicitly requested to install, check, enable, disable, or uninstall the integration. Codex and Claude Code share one ~/.kimi-code/config.toml but each own a host-scoped block, so $kimi-setup here does not disturb Claude Code's /kimi:setup (and vice-versa).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eight tested identity approaches for Claude prompts, each shaping depth, vocabulary, reasoning style, and what Claude treats as obvious vs. requiring explanation. Use when the user wants a specific identity template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building a role definition. Trigger on: "give me the Strategic Advisor identity," "show me the identity template for," "I need a Technical Architect role," "build a custom role for," "show me all available identities." Also use when reviewing a prompt's identity layer or when output lacks domain-appropriate depth. Provides 8 tested approaches across strategy, technical, research, communications, and operations domains plus a template for building custom identities. If the user is unsure which identity fits their task, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating complete prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for full prompt assembly — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-configuring content creation pipeline with geo-lint validation. On first use, scans your project to learn its framework, content schema, categories, and authors, then creates SEO & GEO-optimized content matched to your brand voice. Validates every piece with geo-lint's 92 rules until zero violations. Triggers on: "content-creator", "create content", "write blog", "new post", "content calendar", "brand voice", "content strategy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and explain the RuField deterministic synthetic benchmark and local sensing dashboard. Use for a RuField demo, quickstart, benchmark baseline, or viewer smoke test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FastAPI-specific delta on top of python-foundation:sqlalchemy-patterns: async engine and AsyncSession lifecycle, get_db dependency injection, async-safe lazy loading rules, async Alembic env.py wiring. Used by fastapi-architect (model definitions) and alembic-specialist (column type finalization and migration generation). Activated automatically by fastapi-plugin/stack.md. Use this skill to: - Manage async database sessions with AsyncSession and async_sessionmaker. - Inject sessions into routes via the get_db() dependency. - Apply async-safe lazy loading (lazy="selectin" or "raise"; never sync lazy loads). - Integrate async Alembic env.py for migration autogeneration. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-agnostic model, column, relationship, and querying rules — see python-foundation:sqlalchemy-patterns (load it first). - FastAPI routing and Pydantic schemas — see fastapi-plugin:fastapi-conventions. - Alembic migration execution (that's alembic-specialist's job) — this skill covers definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Java idioms for any JVM project (Java 17+): records, sealed types, text blocks, pattern matching, Optional discipline, streams, immutability, null safety, package layout, var usage, and code organisation. Apply when the project is a Java 17+ project. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every Java plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write self-documenting, immutable-by-default value types with records. - Model closed type hierarchies with sealed classes and interfaces. - Handle optionality explicitly with Optional instead of returning null. - Write expressive pipelines with Stream API without performance footguns. - Lay out packages consistently (feature-first or layer-first) and keep class responsibilities tight. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific idioms (Spring annotations, JPA mappings — those live in framework plugin skills). - Build tooling (Maven/Gradle) — see java-foundation:build-tooling. - Testing patterns — see java-foundation:jvm-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern C# idioms for any .NET project (C# 10+, .NET 6+): nullable reference types, records, readonly structs, primary constructors, pattern matching, async/await with CancellationToken, IDisposable/IAsyncDisposable, file-scoped namespaces, var usage, naming conventions (PascalCase members, _camelCase fields, I-prefixed interfaces), and class design rules. Apply whenever the project is a .NET 6+ project. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write self-documenting immutable value types with records and readonly structs. - Handle nullable reference types explicitly to eliminate NullReferenceException at compile time. - Implement async/await correctly with CancellationToken propagation and ConfigureAwait(false) in libraries. - Dispose unmanaged resources correctly via IDisposable / IAsyncDisposable and using statements. - Apply C# pattern matching (switch expressions, property patterns, list patterns) for cleaner branching logic. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific idioms (ASP.NET Core controllers, minimal APIs, EF Core — those live in aspnet-core-plugin skills). - Build tooling (dotnet CLI, NuGet, csproj) — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-tooling. - Testing patterns — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entity Framework Core patterns for ASP.NET Core projects: DbContext design, code-first entity configuration (Fluent API via IEntityTypeConfiguration<T>), relations (HasOne/HasMany, cascade/restrict/set-null), indexes and unique constraints, projection to DTOs (Select + AsNoTracking), avoiding N+1 (Include, AsSplitQuery), transactions, parameterized raw SQL (FromSql with FormattableString), and connection string from IConfiguration. Works alongside aspnet-core-plugin:aspnet-conventions. Use this skill to: - Design a clean DbContext with ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly for scalable entity registration. - Configure entity properties (column types, max length, precision, nullability) via Fluent API. - Avoid N+1 query problems with explicit Include / projection to DTOs. - Use transactions correctly for multi-entity operations. - Write parameterized raw SQL safely when LINQ is not expressive enough. Do NOT use this skill for: - Migration generation commands (that is efcore-specialist's job in the database extra phase). - ASP.NET Core middleware, DI, or validation — see aspnet-core-plugin:aspnet-conventions. - C# language idioms — see csharp-foundation:csharp-conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。