6,684 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Converts hunt findings into portable Sigma detection rules: choosing the right logsource, expressing robust selection/filter logic, setting level and ATT&CK tags, and validating before converting to a SIEM query. Activates for requests to write a Sigma rule, convert a hunt to a detection, or create portable SIEM detection logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunts for ransomware precursor behavior that precedes encryption — shadow-copy and backup deletion, recovery disabling, security-tool tampering, and mass file modification — so the attack can be stopped before payload detonation. Activates for requests to hunt ransomware precursors, detect shadow-copy deletion, or find pre-encryption recovery sabotage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collects volatile evidence from a potentially compromised host in correct order of volatility: memory, network state, running processes, logged-on users, and open handles, while preserving integrity and minimizing footprint. Activates for requests to collect volatile evidence, perform live response, or capture host state before shutdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide whether a Pulp test earns its place — before writing it, when reviewing one, or when sweeping a subsystem for low-value, duplicated, or mis-routed tests. Applies a four-question authoring gate, a junk-pattern list, a retention bar, and an evidence template for any deletion, and routes kept tests to the right lane (required gate, pr-fast, slow, nightly). Handles "should I add a test for this", "is this test useful", "audit these tests", "reduce test time", "which tests can go", and "move toward functional tests".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The acceptance bar for anything Pulp can install (a `pulp tool` registry entry, `pulp add` package, or any downloadable). Validate the FULL lifecycle — install AND uninstall, from OUTSIDE a Pulp checkout, with the installed-user's binary — before its README or docs ship. TRIGGER when adding/editing tools/packages/tool-registry.json, a new binary_download/python_pip/npm_package tool, a `pulp add` importer, or writing docs that tell users to install something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to write source comments, doc comments, and test names/tags that have lasting value — and what to never write. Consult before adding or editing comments in core/**, examples/**, tools/**, test/**, docs/**, or any shipped source. Handles "write a comment", "is this comment ok", "comment hygiene", and keeping new code from adding the breadcrumbs the cleanup stream removes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide whether several finished branches ship as ONE PR or stay separate. Use when holding 2+ green branches before `shipyard pr`. Trades CI cost against revert granularity, urgency, and the diff-coverage gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate, install, update, list, rescan, remove, and reveal data-only Pulp content packs for installed plugins. Use for presets, themes, samples, sample banks, wavetables, and other end-user data that must be reviewed before install or update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, inspect, plan, apply, remove, pack, and scaffold local Pulp package manifests. Use for Pulp-native source/UI/template kits and for untrusted or semi-trusted manifest-bearing artifacts that must be reviewed before project mutation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product-led growth and customer-base growth for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for self-serve funnel work (activation, time-to-value, free trial vs freemium, PQL definition, in-product upgrade moments, sales-assist triggers), for the self-guided interactive product demo that runs in front of the login wall (demo portfolio and flow design, gated vs ungated policy, demo seed data and privacy, keeping a published demo in sync with the shipping product, step-level demo analytics), and for growing revenue from existing customers (adoption, expansion, churn-save, the self-serve cancel flow and failed-payment recovery, renewal marketing, net revenue retention, and champion tracking: watching the people who bought and used you at each customer, confirming a job change from evidence, and running both plays a move fires, the seat they left and the account they joined). Also triggers on: PLG, product-led growth, activation, aha moment, time to value, free trial, freemium, PQL, product qualified lead, onboarding, self-serve, customer marketing, expansion revenue, upsell, cross-sell, churn, retention, NRR, renewal, cancel flow, cancellation flow, save offer, exit survey, pause subscription, dunning, failed payment recovery, involuntary churn, people keep canceling, champion tracking, job change signals, job change alerts, our champion left, our champion changed jobs, customer alumni, former customers who moved to a new company, interactive demo, self-guided demo, product tour, click-through demo, demo automation, demo library, should our demo be gated, ungated demo, demo without a sales call, our demo is out of date, demo shows the old UI, put a demo on our homepage, demo completion rate, demo drop-off, try before you talk to sales.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive social media operations for B2B SaaS brand building and engagement. Use this skill to develop LinkedIn strategy, decide whether to run a LinkedIn newsletter and how to scope it, capture consented registrations from LinkedIn Events, check LinkedIn Live eligibility, manage Twitter/X presence, create YouTube content, engage on Reddit communities, decide whether and how to answer on Quora, build community, develop influencer and creator partnerships, vet a creator before paying them, start or fix a B2B podcast, book podcast guests and guest appearances, judge whether a podcast is worth appearing on when you cannot audit its numbers, write show notes and transcripts, run social listening (what are people saying about us, share of voice, brand monitoring, validated sentiment, alert thresholds, routing signals to the right owner), and execute organic social campaigns. Also triggers on: LinkedIn, LinkedIn newsletter, LinkedIn Events, LinkedIn Live, event registration form, subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn, marketing consent checkbox, Notify Employees, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, community, influencer, creator partnerships, influencer vetting, engagement rate, fake followers, engagement pods, FTC disclosure, sponsored post disclosure, media kit, social media strategy, organic social, employee advocacy, podcast, podcast strategy, podcast guesting, how do I know if this podcast has real listeners, the host says they get 50k downloads, is this podcast worth going on, podcast RSS feed research, IAB podcast measurement certification, Listen Score, Apple Podcasts reviews, show notes, audiogram, episode transcript, social media account access, who has admin on our LinkedIn page, the person who ran our social accounts left, locked out of our company account, social media offboarding, YouTube channel owner, Slack primary owner, social account MFA, social media approval workflow, pause all scheduled posts, social listening, what are people saying about us, brand monitoring, brand mentions, share of voice, social share of voice vs competitors, sentiment analysis, is our sentiment dashboard accurate, listening query, boolean query, mention alerts, spike alert, CrowdTangle replacement, Reddit API access, which platforms can our listening tool see, someone on Reddit asked for a tool like ours, comment mining, voice of customer from social.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing mathematical, logical, algorithmic, or technical proof from its stated conclusion backward as a bounded AND/OR graph of exact obligations. Use to reconstruct conclusion dependencies, determine whether a proof-supplied route establishes the conclusion, or expose hidden assumptions, unmet side conditions, cycles, overly strong steps, or silent route switches. For a source-mapped Lamport rendering use convert-lamport, and for forward hierarchy, construct, and scope conformance use forward-lamport before this skill. This does not decide full theorem-level entailment by searching for a different proof; do not turn the audit into a linear reversed proof, exhaustive proof search, or replacement proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert an existing prose, flat, or loosely organized mathematical proof into a source-mapped Lamport-style hierarchy without repairing or completing its mathematics. Use when a submitted proof needs a traceable hierarchical rendering before a forward Lamport audit or for clearer presentation. Do not use to invent a proof, certify validity, or restructure an already hierarchical proof merely to audit it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before designing, training, or auditing ANY model that replicates human-annotated labels, audit the annotation protocol's INPUT — the exact document/evidence the human labelers consulted — and give the model that same input. Use when: (1) designing a classifier/LLM extractor whose target is a hand-coded label set, (2) a label-replication model shows low recall concentrated in a label subset and the diagnosis on offer is "the label's information is not in the features", (3) reviewers propose construct splits (e.g. "designation vs record-evident"), adjudication sittings, or per-domain stop rules to explain residual disagreement with gold, (4) validating an extraction pipeline against labels transcribed from a source document. Symptom of the underlying failure: elaborate theory accumulates to explain why gold is "partially unpredictable" when the model was simply never shown the document the annotators read.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate resumption of any multi-day LLM batch-scoring campaign that calls an unpinned model alias (deepseek-chat, gpt-*-latest, gemini-*-preview, any provider alias without a pinned version). Use when: (1) resuming a paused or credit-exhausted scoring run days after its last chunk, (2) topping up credits to finish a campaign, (3) extending a cached scoring pipeline with new items. Prevents silently splicing two model versions or serving revisions into one measure. Verified 2026-07-16: for $0.30 caught a serving-revision drift WITHIN DeepSeek v4-flash (same alias, same family, litigation scores systematically shifted across a 2-day gap) before an $83 resume spend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pyfixest demeaner_backend="cupy64" (including its CPU fallback when cupy is absent) is NOT numerically identical to the default numba backend and does NOT drop fully-absorbed/collinear regressors the same way. Use when: (1) adding demeaner_backend="cupy64" to existing pf.feols/fepois calls changes the printed coefficient table, (2) a regression report suddenly gains rows with absurd estimates (e.g. coef 435.8, SE 7106) for controls absorbed by the fixed effects, (3) diffing outputs before/after a backend change, or (4) anything parses a pyfixest text report by line position.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-orchestrator — dispatches to the right skill for the task. Use before any non-trivial work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proactive architecture review — explore codebase structure, generate a self-contained HTML report with Mermaid diagrams and candidate improvements, then grill the findings. Use when planning a large refactor, onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase, or before a major architectural change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Flutter UI from Figma MCP or image input. Scans src for design tokens (colors, sizes, text styles), existing components, and naming conventions before writing a single line of code. Never hard-codes values.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert current conversation context into a structured Product Requirements Document (PRD) and optionally post it to GitHub Issues. Use before /supergraph:plan when requirements came from a conversation, user story, or feature discussion rather than a formal spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build throwaway code to validate an uncertain approach before committing to a plan. Two branches — Logic (terminal state machine) or UI (multiple designs on one route with URL-param switcher). No persistence, no tests, single-command start. Use between analyze and plan when the approach itself is uncertain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。