「write」の検索結果

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, and stack-trace activity-name patterns. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects moving data through pipelines. Watches the three delivery surfaces — CDP destinations and transformations (hog functions), batch exports, and hog flows (workflows/messaging) — for contradictions between configured state and actual delivery: functions the watcher quietly degraded or disabled, failure rates stepping above a pipeline's own baseline, batch export runs failing or stalling (a growing data gap), and active flows failing for the people they trigger on. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects collecting Content Security Policy (CSP) violation reports. Watches `$csp_violation` events for fresh blocked-URL clusters, per-directive bursts, page-scoped regressions after deploys, and suspicious third-party domains that may indicate a compromised script. Emits aggregated findings only when a cluster clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using AI observability. Rotates through a set of lenses — cost, latency, errors, volume, eval performance, eval/enrichment config, clusters, and tool usage — watching each for trends and spikes sliced by the dimensions it discovers over time. Leans on the sandbox's bundled `exploring-llm-*` deep-dive skills for the actual queries. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other scouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective prompts for LLMs — structure, few-shot examples, chain-of-thought, system prompts, and output parsing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle production incidents — triage, mitigate, communicate, and write postmortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document and type a Sentry API endpoint. Write or fix @extend_schema decorators, specify response TypedDicts, type request parameters, correct type drift between the declared schema and the runtime response, and validate the generated spec. Use when asked to "document an endpoint", "add OpenAPI docs", "add/fix @extend_schema", "type an endpoint response", "fix the response type", "fix type drift", "reuse a response type", "split an overloaded endpoint", "specify the response schema", "add a TypedDict response", "migrate a legacy api-docs path", "fix a parameter type", or "make an endpoint public" / "promote an endpoint" (promotion is one section here).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why a PostHog endpoint is slow or expensive and propose a concrete fix — bump the cache TTL, enable materialisation, restructure variables, or rewrite the query. Use when the user says "this endpoint is slow", "my endpoint times out", "we're hitting the cost cap on this one", or asks "should I materialise this?". Focuses on a single named endpoint, not a project-wide audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write copy following Sentry brand guidelines. Use when writing UI text, error messages, empty states, onboarding flows, 404 pages, documentation, marketing copy, or any user-facing content. Covers both Plain Speech (default) and Sentry Voice tones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end observational epidemiology analysis — from research question (PECO Population/Exposure/Comparator/Outcome) to publication-ready statistical report. Covers cohort/case-control/cross-sectional design, regression with confounders, propensity scoring, sensitivity analysis. Writes Python code for every step. Use for epidemiology study analysis, NHANES/UK-Biobank-style analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, writes, and converts molecular file formats (SMILES, InChI, SDF V2000/V3000, MOL2, PDB, MMTF) using RDKit and Open Babel with rigorous handling of aromaticity perception, stereochemistry, implicit/explicit hydrogens, kekulization, and salt/fragment separation. Use when loading chemical libraries, debugging parse failures, or preparing molecules for downstream standardization, descriptor calculation, or docking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help funded SCF teams write tranche submission reports. Use when a team has completed a tranche milestone and needs to document their deliverables for review to unlock the next payment. Covers deliverable documentation, completion evidence, demo preparation, and the specific format tranche reviewers expect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft Stellar Community Fund Build Award applications interactively. Use when helping teams write their SCF submission — walks through project description, Stellar integration rationale, technical architecture, team section, deliverables, budget, and traction evidence. Produces a complete draft aligned with what funded projects look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes work-in-progress code and tests based on design doc

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the next failing test based on provided design doc and existing todo tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write repository-consistent C# only after proving symbol access, ownership, and compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write concise technical guidance, PR notes, architecture explanations, and reproducible verification reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured bug diagnosis and fixing workflow — reproduce, diagnose root cause, apply minimal fix, write regression test, and scan for similar patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。