6,773 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full project health diagnostic — checks structure, agents, features, scripts, extensions, and git status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full project health diagnostic — checks structure, agents, features, scripts, extensions, and git status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when auditing the ENTIRE project architecture and production readiness in one pass — bundles architecture-review + architecture-scalability-review + production-readiness-review at project or diff scope, then synthesizes one consolidated Architecture Health Report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CRM-lite for managing GEO agency prospects and clients. Track leads through the full sales pipeline: Lead → Qualified → Proposal Sent → Won → Lost. Store audit history, notes, deal values, and generate pipeline summaries. Use when user says "prospect", "lead", "client", "pipeline", "crm", "nuovo prospect", "aggiungi cliente", or when managing the business side of GEO services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic testing methodology for exhaustive branch coverage, edge case identification, and production bug prevention. Use when PR review reveals incomplete test coverage, when tests pass but users report bugs, when code changes break existing features, when verifying all branches and edge cases before merge, when analyzing "it works on my machine" issues, when planning test strategy for new features, or when debugging flaky tests and race conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing types and collections for hot paths and low-allocation .NET code. Keywords: readonly struct, sealed class, ValueTask, Span, FrozenDictionary, FrozenSet, allocation optimisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, extend, validate, and publish a ChatGPT Sites application whose durable database and backend functions run on Convex. Use when a user invokes $codex-sites-convex, selects this skill from the skill picker, asks for a ChatGPT Site backed by Convex, or asks to add Convex data, realtime queries, mutations, authentication, files, schedules, or actions to an existing ChatGPT Sites project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need this project's coding standards (line length, quotes, import order, naming, commit format) — derive them from the REAL tooling config as a pointer + digest, never a guessed claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use BEFORE planning/coding against a DB schema, API/GraphQL shape, DTO/Model/Entity, or vendor package — read the real source, emit an Evidence Report, stop inventing fields.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up Traefik as a local reverse proxy — real domains on 127.0.0.1, trusted HTTPS via mkcert, automatic service discovery, and multi-project routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a repo has its own generators, scripts or turbo tasks and an agent reaches for a generic skill instead — derive a Playbook context (ADR-244) from the real config, graded by the tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up Laravel Pulse — real-time dashboard, built-in cards, custom recorders, performance insights — even when the user just says 'I need app monitoring' without naming Pulse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building Laravel real-time features — Broadcasting events, ShouldBroadcast, private/presence channels, Echo client. For non-Laravel WebSockets, use the stack-native skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the image provider from job shape — text-in-image to Ideogram, photoreal to Flux, illustrative vector to Recraft, general to Gemini/GPT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to learn a topic or verify real understanding — rapid-competence session, error drills, learning sprint, gap probe, Feynman check. Triggers 'teach me X', 'quiz me'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when constructing the forecast call — commit / best-case / pipeline categorisation, deal-level evidence test, accuracy retro-loop. Triggers on 'build the forecast', 'why does our commit miss'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wing-4 valuation cognition for a CFO / finance-partner. Use when a deal, internal investment, or board ask names DCF, intrinsic value, WACC, terminal value, or 'what's it worth on a 5-year hold'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing churn defence — health-score signals, churn-cause split (involuntary / value / relationship / fit), early-warning loop. Triggers on 'why are accounts leaving'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodically inspect a sprint manager and worker sessions against a sprint spec, classify progress, nudge only for real stalls, and always append a checkpoint log beside the sprint file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harness-first workflow for evaluating and improving terminal UIs through real interaction. Use this whenever the user wants to review a TUI experience, compare before/after behavior, identify UX friction, validate navigation or filtering flows, inspect visual stability, or turn observed interaction problems into concrete follow-up tests and improvement recommendations. Prefer this skill any time a TUI should be exercised through a reproducible PTY/session harness instead of only reading code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。