「ara」の検索結果

Exploit weak password reset and change flows via CSRF on reset forms, cross-user password modification by swapping username parameters, token predictability in reset links, reset displaying old password in plaintext (revealing weak storage), missing current-password verification on change forms, and session hijacker lockout via passwordless change. Test with Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP following OWASP Forgot Password Cheat Sheet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and tool-calling systems for security vulnerabilities including tool injection, parameter manipulation, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration through AI agent tool interfaces. Use this skill when assessing MCP server implementations, AI agent tool integrations, or any system that exposes tools to language models. Covers tool confusion attacks, cross-tool exploitation, and MCP server hardening assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open redirect playbook. Use when URL parameters, form actions, or JavaScript sinks control navigation targets and may redirect users to attacker-controlled destinations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit path traversal and local/remote file inclusion (LFI/RFI) via URL parameters, cookies, and hidden fields using ../ sequences, URL encoding (%2e%2e%2f), double encoding (%252e%252e%255c), Unicode bypasses (..%c0%af), and Windows UNC paths. PHP include/require with $_GET/$_POST/$_COOKIE pattern. Target /etc/passwd, boot.ini, web.config. Tools: DotDotPwn, WFuzz, Burp Suite, ZAP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit validation and exploitation using Metasploit Framework. Runs in a dedicated Docker container (separate from Kali). Validates CVEs discovered by nuclei, nikto, or other scanners with actual exploit modules. Covers exploit selection, payload configuration, exploitation, and post-exploitation pivoting. Uses msfconsole, msfvenom, and the Metasploit module database. Chains from /pentester, /analyze-cve, or /post-exploit when exploitable CVEs are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit Java Insecure Deserialization vulnerabilities leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Identify serialized Java objects natively passed within HTTP parameters, cookies, or sockets (e.g., `rO0AB...`). Utilize `ysoserial` to meticulously craft malignant payload chains exploiting vulnerable gadget libraries like CommonsCollections inherently present in the application's classpath.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), or Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), vulnerabilities. Manipulate internal identifiers (e.g., user IDs, database primary keys, transaction IDs) within HTTP request parameters or API payloads to unauthorizedly access, modify, or delete data belonging to other users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when testing JWT-based authentication for algorithm confusion, alg:none bypass, weak HMAC secrets, missing expiration, kid parameter injection, and token storage in localStorage. Trigger on: Authorization: Bearer tokens, JWTs in cookies, any base64url encoded header.payload.signature pattern, OAuth2 access tokens, API authentication tokens, SSO tokens, JWKS endpoints. Detects RS256→HS256 confusion, public key as HMAC secret, unverified kid values used in file reads or SQL queries, and JWT cracking with short secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRLF injection playbook. Use when user input reaches HTTP response headers, Location redirects, Set-Cookie values, or log files where carriage-return/line-feed characters can split or inject content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, exploit, and write custom payloads for classic Stack-Based Buffer Overflows in 32-bit and 64-bit applications. Use this skill when conducting exploit development, reverse engineering custom network protocols, or preparing for advanced certifications (OSCP, OSEP). Covers fuzzing, controlling EIP/RIP, identifying bad characters, generating shellcode, finding return/JMP instructions, and gaining reverse shells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test horizontal and vertical authorization bypass via session ID swapping between accounts, IDOR through parameter manipulation (invoice=, user=, menuitem=, EventID=), and special header injection (X-Original-URL, X-Rewrite-URL, X-Forwarded-For, X-Remote-IP, X-Client-IP with 127.0.0.1/localhost/RFC1918 values). Tools: Burp Suite with Autorize/AuthMatrix extensions, OWASP ZAP Access Control Testing add-on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in the core business rules and logic of web applications. This skill focuses on manipulation of application workflows, pricing, inventory limitations, and multi-step processes. Use this skill when bug hunting or testing e-commerce, banking, or SaaS platforms where standard technical vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS/SQLi) are not present but the application's logic is flawed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in API rate limiting enforcement. Use this skill when encountering HTTP 429 Too Many Requests errors during password brute-forcing, OTP validation, credential stuffing, or enumeration attacks. These bypasses leverage IP spoofing, parameter manipulation, and edge-case application logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs. Use this skill when testing REST APIs or application forms that directly map user-supplied JSON or POST input to internal database objects. An attacker can inject undocumented variables (e.g., `is_admin`, `verified`) to illegally modify restricted properties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for API security. Use when choosing between API recon, authorization, token abuse, and hidden-parameter workflows before any deeper API topic skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypass authentication via forced browsing to protected URLs, parameter tampering (authenticated=yes, debug=true, fromtrustIP=true), session ID prediction from linear/incremental cookies, SQL injection on login forms, PHP unserialize() boolean type juggling (b:1 payload), and credential transport over HTTP. Detectable with Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, WebGoat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically discover hidden Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), uncover undocumented endpoints (Shadow APIs), and fuzz parameters. Use this skill as the pivotal first step in API Bug Hunting, transforming a basic frontend application into a vast mapped attack surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a whole-registry sweep of Gaia — fan out 13 parallel audit agents across every skill, run adversarial verification, surface Semantic Fusion candidates, propose new generic skill references, and synthesize a publish-ready HTML report under docs/meta/reports/. Use this skill for broad, systemic analysis across many skills at once: "run a meta sweep", "sweep the meta", "full meta audit", "audit the whole registry against META.md", "widespread nomenclature issues", "find all skills missing a GitHub link", "produce a meta report", "check for evidence type mismatches across the registry", "find skills that document a third-party tool with no attribution", or explicitly types /gaia-meta-sweep. This is the registry-wide macro companion to /gaia-meta-audit (a prioritized queue, single-pass) and /gaia-audit (fixes one skill). Use it when you need the full surface — 13 audit dimensions, adversarial verification, fusion proposals, and a durable findings artifact — not just a queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune large language models — data curation, SFT, parameter-efficient methods (LoRA), evaluation, and avoiding common training failures. Use when a base model needs task-specific behavior or domain knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis — mechanisms, kinetics, catalyst characterization, and deactivation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BCI design and evaluation — signal decoding, calibration, closed-loop paradigms, and performance metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。