「report」の検索結果

Collects and synthesizes open-source intelligence (OSINT) about threat actors, malicious infrastructure, and attack campaigns using publicly available data sources, passive reconnaissance tools, and dark web monitoring. Use when investigating external threat actor infrastructure, performing pre-engagement reconnaissance for authorized red team assessments, or enriching CTI reports with publicly available adversary context. Activates for requests involving Maltego, Shodan, OSINT framework, SpiderFoot, or infrastructure reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration testing against AWS, Azure, and GCP cloud environments. It covers understanding the shared responsibility model for testing scope, leveraging cloud-specific attack tools like Pacu and ScoutSuite, exploiting IAM misconfigurations, testing for SSRF to cloud metadata services, and reporting findings aligned to MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a vulnerability aging dashboard and SLA tracking system to measure remediation performance against severity-based timelines and drive accountability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts comprehensive network penetration tests against authorized target environments by performing host discovery, port scanning, service enumeration, vulnerability identification, and controlled exploitation to assess the security posture of network infrastructure. The tester follows PTES methodology from reconnaissance through post-exploitation and reporting. Activates for requests involving network pentest, infrastructure security assessment, internal network testing, or external perimeter testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parses Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) in CycloneDX and SPDX JSON formats to identify supply chain vulnerabilities by correlating components against the NVD CVE database via the NVD 2.0 API. Builds dependency graphs, calculates risk scores, identifies transitive vulnerability paths, and generates compliance reports. Activates for requests involving SBOM analysis, software composition analysis, supply chain security assessment, dependency vulnerability scanning, CycloneDX/SPDX parsing, or CVE correlation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds real-time incident response dashboards in Splunk, Elastic, or Grafana to provide SOC analysts and leadership with situational awareness during active incidents, tracking affected systems, containment status, IOC spread, and response timeline. Use when IR teams need unified visibility during incident coordination and post-incident reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect sandbox evasion techniques in malware samples by analyzing timing checks, VM artifact queries, user interaction detection, and sleep inflation patterns from Cuckoo/AnyRun behavioral reports

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes malware samples in Cuckoo Sandbox to observe runtime behavior including process creation, file system modifications, registry changes, network communications, and API calls. Generates comprehensive behavioral reports for malware classification and IOC extraction. Activates for requests involving dynamic malware analysis, sandbox detonation, behavioral analysis, or automated malware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check docs/ai/ spec files and ADRs for inconsistencies with the actual codebase. Report only, no modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full review of a PR, a file, or pasted text against the OpenMetadata Writing Style Guide checklist, plus checking every checkable claim for internal consistency against the diff/PR itself. One combined report, not separate passes. Does not fetch or verify against any external source repository. Link-checking is out of scope; a separate broken-links job covers that. Only runs on explicit /content-review invocation, never self-triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug AEM Workflow issues on AEM as a Cloud Service — stuck workflows, failed steps, missing Inbox tasks, launcher failures, stale instances, thread pool exhaustion, queue backlogs, purge failures, and permissions errors. Use when the user reports workflow problems on Cloud Service, asks why a workflow is stuck or failed, needs step-by-step troubleshooting, or provides thread dumps, configuration status output, or Sling Job console output for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search for existing content pages containing a specific block in AEM Edge Delivery Services. Reports URLs with occurrences and variants to help identify test content during development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crawl and validate all internal and external links across an AEM Edge Delivery Services site. Uses the query index or sitemap to discover pages, extracts links from .plain.html renditions, checks HTTP status codes, and produces a prioritized report of broken, redirecting, and insecure links. Use when auditing link health before launch, after a migration, or as a periodic maintenance check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit images across AEM Edge Delivery Services pages for SEO and performance. Checks alt text quality, missing dimensions, lazy loading on LCP images, fetch priority, file naming, and decorative image handling. Generates a per-page report with specific fix instructions for alt text (in the source document) and performance attributes (in block code or scripts). Use when optimizing Core Web Vitals, improving image accessibility, or auditing image SEO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our AA KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for requests like "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to fix a specific react-doctor finding on the Namias portfolio. Reads the report, locates the file, applies the canonical fix pattern, re-runs the tool, and commits the slice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Silent failure hunting routing. Use when a change might pass while skipping work, swallowing errors, losing evidence, weakening gates, or reporting false success; do not use for broad code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one bounded adversarial pass when the user explicitly requests a report-style stress test or ROSE identifies a concrete material loophole in an existing strategy, spec, plan, review, or claim; do not trigger for an interactive grill/frontier interview or merely before write-back, implementation, reconciliation, or completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coverage review and verification sufficiency routing. Use when test coverage, uncovered paths, coverage reports, or verification adequacy need a read-only QA review; do not use for writing tests or running browser/E2E artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce or apply an approved report-first proposal for workflow, ROSE, skill, command, subagent, memory, install, or harness-doc changes; use after harness-issue-triage localizes a harness problem or when the user explicitly requests harness maintenance, and do not edit core harness files without explicit human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。