「rl」の検索結果

モンテカルロ・シミュレーションによる株価予測。過去のボラティリティから将来の株価分布を確率的に推定する。「モンテカルロ」「将来の株価」「株価予測」「確率的な株価」「リスク評価」「VaR」「価格分布」と聞かれたときに使用。

Use when the user wants to add source identity from PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, note, experiment result, manual reference, or Zotero item into a Research Pilot project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants an agent to create or update a project-local source/paper note from a PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, manual source, or Zotero item.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits your Cowork setup across five categories, scores each one, and gives you a prioritized improvement plan. For reviewing how well you are using Cowork, when optimizing your workspace configuration, or during a quarterly productivity review. Use when the user says "health check", "am I using cowork right", "optimize my setup", "cowork audit", "what am I missing", "is my setup good", or "how do I get more out of cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Phase 4 (feedback routing) after an adversarial review FAIL. Routes adversary findings to the earliest affected phase, checks iteration limits, and escalates to human if limits are exceeded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a measured semantic core for a brand through official keyword APIs (Yandex Wordstat for RU, Google Ads Keyword Planner / Bing Webmaster worldwide, autocomplete everywhere), commit it as core.json plus a questions.csv, and hand that straight to an open-geo visibility run. Use when the user wants demand research, a semantic core, keyword volume, or "collect the questions and then measure visibility" — no browser and no manual keyword tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Developer personality portrait generator. Supports subcommands: (1) 'generate my portrait' / 'analyze my personality' — full analysis; (2) 'update my portrait' — incremental update since last analysis; (3) 'install persona from <url>' — install community persona from GitHub; (4) 'list personas' / '我安装了哪些人格' — show installed; (5) 'remove persona <id>' — uninstall; (6) 'think like <name>' / '像<name>一样思考' — activate a persona. Also triggers on 'vibe-portrait', 'what kind of developer am I'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VirusTotal API v3 reference. File, IP, domain, and URL analysis endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about Russian state-sponsored cyber operations or specific actors (APT28/Fancy Bear, Sandworm, Cozy Bear/APT29, Turla, GRU-affiliated hacktivist fronts like CARR/NoName057), wartime ICS/OT campaigns, or pro-RU information operations. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to query a MISP instance for existing events/attributes/objects, or push new intel into MISP — adding attributes to an event, creating an event, or uploading a STIX 2 bundle as one or more events. Two-way integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends to check whether an indicator is already known to your CTI sharing community, and by analytical skills that want to publish their findings back to MISP. Reads $MISP_URL and $MISP_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to query an OpenCTI instance — is this IOC already known, what entities/reports/campaigns exist for an actor — or push new intel into it — creating indicators/observables, labelling, TLP markings, relationships, or importing a STIX 2.1 bundle. Two-way integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends to check whether an indicator is already in your knowledge base, and by analytical skills that want to publish their findings back to OpenCTI. Reads $OPENCTI_URL and $OPENCTI_TOKEN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against AlienVault OTX community pulses. Returns pulse count, key pulses, tags, related indicators, and passive DNS. Commonly invoked by investigation skills to pull community context. Retrieval only — does not interpret.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need authoritative classification, threat-name, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, dynamic-analysis or sandbox results on a file hash, or when you need network threat intelligence for a URL/domain/IP from ReversingLabs Spectra Analyze (A1000). Returns verdict, risk score, AV detection ratio, threat name, behavioural tags, and pivot candidates (parent containers, extracted files, related samples by family). Commonly invoked by /hash-investigation and /malware-analysis. Other agents/skills can chain this for deeper malware enrichment beyond VirusTotal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to hunt in the organisation's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace — sweep the logs for IOC hits (IP, domain, hash, URL, account), hunt behavioural TTPs from MITRE ATT&CK techniques, run KQL against live data, or check which tables the workspace actually ingests. Discovers available tables first and only generates KQL for tables that verifiably exist, so hunts adapt to each environment's connectors. Commonly chained by the /*-investigation skills to answer "were we exposed?". Reads $SENTINEL_TENANT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_SECRET, $SENTINEL_WORKSPACE_ID. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the default entry point for any CTI request that doesn't name a specific skill. Activates when a user asks to investigate an indicator, profile a threat actor, write an assessment, enrich IOCs, or build detection rules, and when a user asks where a report or article comes from, how reliable it is, to grade a source, check a report, or split a report into claims, or pastes a bare article URL. Routes to the right investigation, provenance, grading or analysis skill, then auto-applies rigor skills (source rating, TLP, confidence, likelihood) on the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing the assumptions underlying an analytical judgment, the user asks "what are we assuming?" / "are these assumptions still valid?", or before publishing a high-impact assessment. Standard SAT applied during major assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to investigate, check, or characterize a domain or hostname. Chains VirusTotal, URLScan (search existing scans), Shodan (DNS resolve + host), OTX, ransomware.live (victim-status sweep), and optionally Censys. Returns reputation, resolution, hosting fingerprint, ransomware-claim status, and pivot candidates. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging a prevailing analytical judgment, the user asks "what is the opposing case?" / "argue the other side" / "play devil's advocate", or wants an assessment stress-tested before release. Takes the team's own lead judgment and builds the strongest case that it is wrong. A contrarian technique. It does not model what an adversary would do next, which is Red Team Analysis. Formerly /red-team-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence on an indicator (IOC reputation for an IP, domain, hash, or URL — malicious confidence, linked actors, malware families, reports) OR on an adversary (threat-actor profile, origin/target search, MITRE ATT&CK TTPs, finished intel reports). Answers questions like "look up 1.1.1.1", "what TTPs does Charming Kitten use?", "which threat actors operate from Russia?", and "latest report on Mustang Panda". Commonly invoked by the four /*-investigation skills, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, and the regional espionage cells. Other agents/skills can chain this for vendor-authoritative actor and finished-intel context. Requires a Falcon Intelligence subscription.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an assistant's own closing line left in the document), to compare documents for overlap, or mentions signs-of-ai / SignsOfAI. Backed by the SignsOfAI engine — for a measured 0–100 score, sentence-rhythm burstiness, originality, citations, a writer baseline or perplexity, hand off to that engine (web app, CLI or MCP server) as described below. It cannot determine who wrote a text and must never imply that it can.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。