6,843 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
基于域健康报告和沙盘Gap记录，识别断裂模式，生成具体的补全行动方案：新Skill提案/现有Skill修改建议/缺失触发链路描述。与 skill-evolution-planner-meta 的区别：后者基于历史日志做宏观演进规划；本Skill基于具体Gap证据做定向修复。触发词：「优化[域名]域」「修复[域名]域Gap」「[域名]域自优化」「根据健康报告生成修复方案」。通常由 skill-closure-verifier-meta 调用，也可独立触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
引导用户进行自我认知反思，结构化写入自我反思记录，并与历史模式做跨时间比对。触发词：「反思」「我发现我有个习惯」「我注意到」「我又犯了」「这个模式」「我有个问题」「感觉自己」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database migration best practices for schema changes, data migrations, rollbacks, and zero-downtime deployments across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and common ORMs (Prisma, Drizzle, Kysely, Django, TypeORM, golang-migrate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build throwaway code to validate an uncertain approach before committing to a plan. Two branches — Logic (terminal state machine) or UI (multiple designs on one route with URL-param switcher). No persistence, no tests, single-command start. Use between analyze and plan when the approach itself is uncertain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three.js interaction - raycasting, controls, mouse/touch input, object selection. Use when handling user input, implementing click detection, adding camera controls, or creating interactive 3D experiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proactive architecture review — explore codebase structure, generate a self-contained HTML report with Mermaid diagrams and candidate improvements, then grill the findings. Use when planning a large refactor, onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase, or before a major architectural change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk analysis and approach selection before planning. Use when requirements are ambiguous, approaches vary, or work touches hub/bridge nodes. Skip for typo fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate App Store & Google Play screenshot generation for Flutter apps. Scans routing and screens, scores high-value marketing screens, generates self-contained mock harness, runs native simulator captures (iPhone 6.9", iPad 13", Android Phone/Tablet), strips alpha channels, and validates exact store resolutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity data-driven design architecture. ScriptableObject config hierarchies, JSON data pipelines, designer handoff workflows, data versioning and migration, Inspector attributes for self-documenting configs. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity physics query correctness patterns. Catches common mistakes with Raycast, SphereCast, OverlapSphere, NonAlloc allocation, LayerMask construction, trigger interaction, hit ordering, and query type selection. PATTERN format: WHEN/WRONG/RIGHT/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity save/load system architecture. Serialization format selection, save data DTOs, versioning and migration, cloud sync, PlayerPrefs scoping, auto-save strategies, mobile persistence. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up or reviewing Storybook component documentation, design-system presentation, isolated component state previews, stories, addons, decorators, MDX docs, component-state interaction checks, visual baselines, or Chromatic. For real-browser cross-page journeys or broader coverage planning, choose the matching testing workflow first; Chinese triggers include Storybook, component documentation, Design System, visual regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when safely removing dead frontend code, unused exports, stale components, obsolete routes, unused dependencies, or cleanup targets found by tools such as knip, depcheck, ts-prune, TypeScript, ESLint, or manual review. Do not use for feature rewrites that change behavior; Chinese triggers include dead code, clean up unused, refactor clean, dependency cleanup, delete useless code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when selecting or composing behavior-preserving refactoring techniques after structural evidence is known, especially when multiple candidate transformations, preconditions, or ordering choices must be compared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on conditional complexity, repeated branches, guards, special cases, or internal invariants, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on variable meaning, field naming, derived state, or reference/value identity, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function structure, naming, parameters, shared context, or phase boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on record, collection, value, responsibility, delegation, or algorithm boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on legacy OO hierarchies, subtype responsibilities, superclass extraction/collapse, or delegation, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing UI from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Modao, MockingBot, screenshots, design selections, design tokens, or design-to-code tasks for production frontend components/pages; Chinese triggers include design draft, implementation by design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when proving that a frontend refactoring preserved existing behavior, selecting an appropriate safety net, validating each structural step, or assigning a PASS, PARTIAL, or NOT PROVEN preservation verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。