5,728 件 ・ 関連度順
Set up a complete CI/CD pipeline for a project. Detects the stack, then generates and validates GitHub Actions workflows, a Dockerfile, and a Makefile as one coherent pipeline. Use when asked to "set up CI", "add pipeline", "create GitHub Actions", "ci/cd setup", "automate builds", "containerize", or "add a Makefile".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
interview the user to design an agentic control loop (sensor, controller, actuator under disturbances) tailored to their codebase, then build it as locally-runnable components plus a scheduled coding-agent workflow
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn any URL — landing page, blog post, product page, documentation page, changelog, public PDF, or web article — into a finished AI-generated video using the Ozor MCP. Use this skill whenever the user gives a link and wants a video from its content: 'make a video from this URL', 'video from my landing page', 'turn this blog post into a video', 'video from https://...', 'video from our homepage', 'generate a video from this product page', 'create a video from this article'. This skill runs analyze_document with the url parameter (no scraping needed on our side), presents the resulting plan to the user, then generates → exports → embeds. Do NOT use this skill for a short text brief (use ozor-generate) or for an attached local file (use ozor-document-video).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MCP server for Apple Developer Documentation. Search iOS/macOS/SwiftUI/UIKit docs, WWDC videos with transcripts, sample code, and framework APIs. Use when you need to look up Apple APIs, check platform compatibility, find WWDC sessions, or browse framework symbols. Install the MCP server first, then use its tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with iOS/macOS Keychain Services (SecItem queries, kSecClass, OSStatus errors), biometric authentication (LAContext, Face ID, Touch ID), CryptoKit (AES-GCM, ChaChaPoly, ECDSA, ECDH, HPKE, ML-KEM), Secure Enclave, secure credential storage (OAuth tokens, API keys), certificate pinning (SecTrust, SPKI), keychain sharing across apps/extensions, migrating secrets from UserDefaults or plists, or OWASP MASVS/MASTG mobile compliance on Apple platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform cryptographic operations using Apple CryptoKit. Use when hashing data with SHA256/SHA384/SHA512, generating HMAC authentication codes, encrypting with AES-GCM or ChaChaPoly, signing with P256/P384/P521/Curve25519 keys, performing ECDH key agreement, storing keys in the Secure Enclave, or migrating from CommonCrypto to CryptoKit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access security tokens and smart cards using CryptoTokenKit. Use when building token driver extensions with TKTokenDriver and TKToken, communicating with smart cards via TKSmartCard, implementing certificate-based authentication, managing token sessions, or integrating hardware security tokens with the system keychain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify device legitimacy and app integrity using DeviceCheck (DCDevice per-device bits) and App Attest (DCAppAttestService key generation, attestation, and assertion flows). Use when implementing fraud prevention, detecting compromised devices, validating app authenticity with Apple's servers, protecting sensitive API endpoints with attested requests, or adding device verification to a backend architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate Game Center features using GameKit. Use when authenticating players with GKLocalPlayer, submitting scores to leaderboards, unlocking achievements, implementing real-time or turn-based multiplayer matchmaking, showing the Game Center access point or dashboard, or adding challenges and friend invitations to iOS games.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for readability, then simplify it to be easy to follow and understand. Use this skill when the user wants to simplify code, improve readability, clean up for handoff, make code skimmable, reduce complexity, refactor for clarity, strip boilerplate, prepare code for future maintainers, or make a codebase easier to pick up. Trigger liberally — any request touching readability, simplification, cleanup, or "make this easier to understand" should use this skill. Also trigger when the user says things like "review this", "clean this up", "tidy this", "make this simpler", "reduce complexity", "flatten this", "strip the noise", or "I want to understand this code quickly next time I open it".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply approved Xcode build optimization changes following best practices, then re-benchmark to verify improvement. Use when a developer has an approved optimization plan from xcode-build-orchestrator, wants to apply specific build fixes, needs help implementing build setting changes, script phase guards, source-level compilation fixes, or SPM restructuring that was recommended by an analysis skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strips AI fingerprints from written text by enforcing banned vocabulary, forbidden sentence structures, and authentic prose patterns. Use when writing articles, documentation, social content, emails, or any text that should read as human-authored rather than AI-generated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user asks to inspect JoCoHunt, 조코헌트, jocohunt.jocoding.io products, ideas, rankings, makers, public security headers, or wants a CLI workflow for the Korean builder community. It runs the local `jocohunt` Go CLI, including authenticated product submission when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discuss a community-edition product requirement with the user, draft a bilingual (Chinese + English) PRD for review, then — after explicit user approval — create the English-only issue on GitHub (<OWNER/REPO>). Use whenever the user wants to turn a requirement (from a Feishu doc, a meeting note, a customer ask, or a rough idea) into a GitHub issue. Triggers on phrases like "create requirement doc", "create a requirement", "put this requirement on GitHub", "create new feature issue", "draft an issue for...", or anytime the user describes a product feature/improvement they want tracked. The format is opinionated (Background / Goal / Spec / Verification / Related, NO implementation details, draft shown bilingually for human review, issue itself written in English only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attach review scores to recorded Whalesong traces and build comparison pairs — mark a session good/bad/regressed, then diff two runs deterministically. Use when evaluating agent changes, reviewing a run after the fact, or building a small eval set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fan six specialist reviewers (general correctness, silent failures, type design, test gaps, comment accuracy, simplification) out over the current diff, a branch, or a PR in parallel, then merge their findings into one deduplicated, ranked report. Use for a thorough review before merging. Not for editing code or approving on someone's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a page or UI against WCAG 2.2 AA. Runs a static HTML scanner and a contrast calculator, then walks the manual keyboard, zoom, screen-reader-name and form checks the tools cannot do, and reports findings with the criterion, evidence, fix and how to verify. Use for accessibility reviews, WCAG checks, contrast questions or "is this accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a GitHub pull request with the GitHub MCP tools - read the description, diff, checks and existing discussion, then report findings in chat. Posts nothing to GitHub unless the user asks for that exact post and approves the text. Use for "review this PR", PR links, or "what changed in
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or editing the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。