664 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
认知-工作对齐健康检查（第四维）。验证五个工作域的核心产出是否可追溯到元思维体系（L1.5原则 or L1文档），识别「漂浮」的工作任务，输出对齐报告。与现有三维健康检查互补：skill-system-health-check（内部一致性）/ cognitive-consistency-check（认知自洽）/ skill-domain-health-check（传播完备性）+ 本Skill（认知根对齐）= 四维完整体系。触发词：「检查工作任务与认知的对齐」「第四维健康检查」「检查工作任务是否有认知根」「认知体系和工作任务是否自洽」「认知对齐检查」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for Tauri v2 positioner plugin with multi-display alignment strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this whenever a downstream Vue project needs to absorb upstream Devkit Vue changes — triggers on "update stack", "sync with devkit", "merge upstream", "pull stack updates", "resolve stack conflicts". Two-phase: ISO merge (stack modules stay byte-identical to upstream) then project alignment (apply MIGRATIONS.md, diff project modules vs `tasks` reference, /verify). Stack-code failures get an issue on `pierreb-devkit/Vue`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Developer-Figma collaboration: dev mode, design tokens, component inspection, handoff, and design-system alignment. Use when implementing designs from Figma or aligning code with a design system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate B2B pipeline — campaign strategy, multi-channel programs, SDR alignment, and pipeline measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end bioinformatics analysis — sequence QC, alignment, and omics pipelines for research data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practice AI safety across the lifecycle — risk assessment, alignment concepts, evaluation, deployment safeguards, and governance. Use when building or deploying AI systems responsibly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit workforce skill gap identification systems and labor market alignment. Triggers: you need to evaluate skill taxonomy quality, individual and aggregate gap analysis accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive K-12 or higher-ed system analysis: predict student dropout risk with early warning indicators, optimize curriculum alignment and pacing, personalize learning paths for at-risk and diverse populations, and audit school operations for resource efficiency..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a resume builder or optimization tool for ATS compatibility, keyword matching accuracy, formatting standards, achievement quantification, skill extraction, and job-description alignment scoring. Use when reviewing resume software, career platforms, applicant tracking integrations, CV generators, or job application tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze retail merchandising systems including planogram optimization (space-to-sales alignment, fair share index, sales per linear foot), visual merchandising effectiveness for in-store displays and e-commerce product pages, market basket analysis with association rule mining (Apriori.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze defense program budgets and acquisition costs — earned value management (EVM/CPI/SPI), should-cost modeling, PPBE process alignment, cost estimation per GAO guidelines, Nunn-McCurdy breach risk, FYDP profiles, and learning curve analysis. Audit DoD 5000 acquisition software, program cost databases, and budget justification systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze mental health care planning systems for treatment goal alignment, intervention scheduling, progress milestone tracking, multi-provider coordination, step-down/step-up criteria, and individualized care pathway optimization..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit curriculum management software for learning outcome alignment, pacing guide optimization, standards coverage mapping (Common Core, NGSS, state standards), differentiation support, assessment design quality, and content gap detection across grade levels and subjects..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a structured Quarterly Business Review deck for a customer account. Use when user says "QBR", "quarterly business review", "prep my QBR", "build the deck", "renewal prep", "executive check-in", "90-day review", or "customer business review" - even if they don't use the acronym. Applies to CSMs preparing for executive-level customer meetings focused on value delivered, health, and next quarter alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or refining the tone, voice, and behavioral personality of an Agentforce agent: system instruction encoding, brand voice alignment, adaptive response formats, multi-persona strategies. NOT for writing the actual conversational copy — utterances, fallback messages, escalation phrasing — use admin/agent-conversation-design. NOT for topic scope design — use agentforce/agent-topic-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when inspecting Blender characters, rigs, poses, animation retargeting, ground contact, facing direction, or model-vs-motion alignment where screenshots alone are not enough.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture meeting notes with clear structure: attendees, agenda, decisions, action items with owners and deadlines. Ensure accountability and alignment post-meeting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。