3,309 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Critically analyze whether a product, repo, skill, plugin, harness, or architecture vision still fits the real application, user intent, implementation, evidence, and likely future direction. Use when asked to assess vision vs application, predict future fit, critique roadmap direction, analyze strategic intent, or decide whether to keep, refine, pivot, or kill a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze one GitHub issue for root cause, complexity, and risk into .idd/analysis-N.json. Use when you need to analyze or scope issue #N. Don't use for creating issues (/issue-creator), triaging (/issue-triage), or resolving (/issue-resolver).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditing Google Cloud Platform IAM permissions to identify overly permissive bindings, primitive role usage, service account key proliferation, and cross-project access risks using gcloud CLI, Policy Analyzer, and IAM Recommender.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) to recover metadata and content of deleted files by examining MFT record entries, $LogFile, $UsnJrnl, and MFT slack space using MFTECmd, analyzeMFT, and X-Ways Forensics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze network device logs to identify connectivity issues, latency problems, and outages. Correlate timestamps across timezones, detect anomaly patterns, and generate incident reports with root cause hypotheses. Use when troubleshooting network incidents from log files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
システムログを分析してエラーの根本原因を特定し、段階的に深堀りしていくデバッグ専門家スキル。 アプリケーションログ、システムログ、クラウドサービスログなど様々な形式に対応。 5 Whys、タイムライン分析、Fishbone分析などのRCA（根本原因分析）手法を用いて 問題の本質を突き止め、再発防止策まで提案する。 Use when analyzing system logs to find error root causes, debugging application issues, or performing technical post-mortem analysis with log data. For organizational incident management processes (post-incident review, corrective action plans, incident reports without log data), use incident-rca-specialist instead. Triggers: "analyze this log", "find the root cause", "debug this error", "why is this failing", "log analysis", "what caused this crash", "troubleshoot this issue"
Professional financial analysis skill for investment decisions, budgeting, financial statement analysis, and business plan evaluation. Use this skill when you need to analyze financial ratios (profitability, safety, efficiency), calculate DCF/NPV/IRR valuations, perform budget variance analysis, or conduct sensitivity/scenario analysis. Triggers include "analyze financial statements", "calculate DCF", "investment evaluation", "budget variance", "財務分析", "投資評価", "予算差異分析".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional business analysis skill aligned with BABOK® Guide v3 standards. Use this skill when you need to elicit and document requirements, analyze business processes, conduct stakeholder analysis, develop business cases, perform gap analysis, or create business requirements documents (BRD). Ideal for requirements gathering, process mapping (BPMN), financial analysis (ROI, NPV), stakeholder engagement, and solution evaluation. Triggers: "gather requirements", "create business case", "analyze process", "stakeholder analysis", "gap analysis", "BRD", "functional requirements", or requests involving business analysis tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
既存コード・既存関数・既存モジュールの暗黙契約を抽出するスキル。 戻り値型、副作用、例外、前提条件、境界条件、環境依存挙動を確認し、 reuse前のリスクを可視化する。名前やコメントではなく実際の挙動から 契約を読み取り、不一致を分類し、再利用可否を判定する。 Use when reusing legacy code, verifying actual behavior of existing functions, or extracting implicit contracts before implementation. Covers: hidden contract, implicit contract, reuse risk, legacy behavior, 暗黙契約, 既存資産調査. Analyzes return types, side effects, exceptions, preconditions, boundary conditions, and environment-dependent behavior.
Analyze all github issues. Use when the user says 'triage the github issues' or 'analyze open github issues'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト設計（test design）活動を支援するスキル。test-analyze が識別したテスト条件から、テスト対象の特性に応じたテスト技法（同値分割・境界値分析・デシジョンテーブル・状態遷移・カバレッジ基準・エラー推測など）を選定提案し、承認された技法で具体的なテストケース（入力値・前提・期待結果）を導出して、設計書 test-design.md（技法選定根拠・カバレッジ）とケース一覧 test-case.md の 2 本を作る。「テストケースを作って」「テストケースを設計して」「どの技法で網羅すべきか提案して」「境界値/デシジョンテーブルでテストを起こして」と依頼されたときに使う。テストコード実装（test-implement）は対象外。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）も対象外。/test-design <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "analyze influencer campaign performance", "compare influencers", or "find what content worked"; produces metric scorecards vs target and benchmark, platform/influencer/content rankings, engagement-quality and sentiment reads, conversion-attribution breakdowns, and ranked learnings. Not for dollar-level return math — use roi-calculator. 达人营销效果分析/投放复盘
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.
Use when working with Deepsource — deepSource code analysis management. Covers automated code reviews, issue detection, antipattern analysis, coverage tracking, and analyzer configuration. Use when managing DeepSource projects, reviewing detected issues, configuring analyzers, or tracking code health metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein. Use when the user provides a specific UniProt Accession ID and wants structural confidence metrics (pLDDT), domain boundary analysis, or disorder assessment. Do not use if the user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence — ask for a UniProt ID first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze brand or topic sentiment across Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram using Xpoz. Classifies posts as positive/neutral/negative, extracts recurring themes, and generates a sentiment report. Use when asked for "sentiment analysis", "what are people saying about X", "brand sentiment", or "social media opinion on X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。