「auditing」の検索結果

JPA/Hibernate patterns for entity design, relationships, query optimization, transactions, auditing, indexing, pagination, and pooling in Spring Boot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect fail-open configurations, hardcoded secrets, weak authentication defaults, permissive CORS, disabled security features, and other insecure-by-default patterns. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use during security review or when auditing configuration and initialization code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for measuring and tracking agent response quality over time. Detects regressions before they reach production. Use when evaluating agent changes, auditing quality, or establishing performance baselines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design comprehensive security architectures using defense-in-depth, zero trust principles, threat modeling (STRIDE, PASTA), and control frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001). Use when designing security for new systems, auditing existing architectures, or establishing security governance programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans .NET code for ~50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, `.cs`, or `.csproj`; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for hard-to-test framework dependencies; or verifying those C# calls are already abstracted. DO NOT USE FOR: any target lacking the activation prerequisite; generating wrappers (use generate-testability-wrappers); migrating code (use migrate-static-to-wrapper); or general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them. USE FOR: reviewing a pull request or patch in a .NET repository; checking for behavioral regressions, API misuse, or missing tests; auditing architectural or framework-specific. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has NRTs enabled, suppressing warnings without fixing them, C# 7.3 or earlier projects. INVOKES: Get-NullableReadiness.ps1 scanner script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or audit UI for Qt/QML, Qt projects, web, or embedded MPU or MCU targets. Use when creating screens, layouts, navigation, or auditing UX.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Network traffic analysis, PCAP parsing, IDS/IPS rule creation, firewall configuration auditing, and network anomaly detection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS/Azure/GCP security auditing, container and Kubernetes hardening, Infrastructure as Code scanning, and cloud compliance assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SSL/TLS auditing, cipher suite analysis, hash algorithm identification, encryption implementation review, and cryptographic weakness detection in code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive data quality assessment against business rules, schema constraints, and freshness expectations. Activate when validating data pipeline outputs before production use, auditing a dataset against defined business rules, or producing a quality scorecard for a data asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, publish readiness, or 内容质量/EEAT评分. Runs 80-item CORE-EEAT scoring with veto checks and fix plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO-optimized blog posts, landing pages, and long-form page copy following Google's E-E-A-T and Helpful Content guidelines. Handles new content creation from a keyword, topic, or brief, and full-page rewrites. Use when asked to "write a blog post", "create a landing page", "write content about X", "content for keyword X", "draft an article", "blog post about", "landing page for", "service page", "product page copy", "rewrite this page", "how-to guide", or "listicle". NOT for analyzing/auditing existing content (seo-geo-optimizer, content-quality-auditor), title tags or meta descriptions (meta-tags-optimizer), or keyword expansion (keyword-research) — those skills own their triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security auditing and vulnerability assessment specialist. Use when conducting security reviews, analyzing code for vulnerabilities, performing OWASP assessments, or creating security audit reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a codebase for semantic duplication - functions that do the same thing but have different names or implementations. Especially useful for LLM-generated codebases where new functions are often created rather than reusing existing ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when reviewing or auditing existing CSS code for consistency with established patterns. Triggers on "review CSS", "audit styles", "check CSS", "validate stylesheet", "CSS review". Checks semantic naming, dark mode coverage, Tailwind usage, and test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate consistency across SEED Design component documentation layers (design guidelines in ./docs/content/docs/components, Rootage specs in ./packages/rootage/components, and React docs in ./docs/content/react/components). Use when auditing documentation completeness, before releases, or validating new component docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when attacking or auditing a CI/CD pipeline or software supply chain — pwn requests, poisoned pipeline execution, compromised/mutable-tag actions, dependency confusion, registry worms, runner backdoors, OIDC trust abuse, SLSA/provenance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing cryptography — TLS/PKI auditing, RSA/ECC key attacks, ECDSA nonce lattice recovery, symmetric/AEAD misuse, JWT/JOSE forgery, hash cracking, post-quantum migration review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。