「builds」の検索結果

Builds dashboards, reports, and data-driven interfaces requiring charts, graphs, or visual analytics. Provides systematic framework for selecting appropriate visualizations based on data characteristics and analytical purpose. Includes 24+ visualization types organized by purpose (trends, comparisons, distributions, relationships, flows, hierarchies, geospatial), accessibility patterns (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance), colorblind-safe palettes, and performance optimization strategies. Use when creating visualizations, choosing chart types, displaying data graphically, or designing data interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds AI chat interfaces and conversational UI with streaming responses, context management, and multi-modal support. Use when creating ChatGPT-style interfaces, AI assistants, code copilots, or conversational agents. Handles streaming text, token limits, regeneration, feedback loops, tool usage visualization, and AI-specific error patterns. Provides battle-tested components from leading AI products with accessibility and performance built in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds form components and data collection interfaces including contact forms, registration flows, checkout processes, surveys, and settings pages. Includes 50+ input types, validation strategies, accessibility patterns (WCAG 2.1), multi-step wizards, and UX best practices. Provides decision trees from data type to component selection, validation timing guidance, and error handling patterns. Use when creating forms, collecting user input, building surveys, implementing validation, designing multi-step workflows, or ensuring form accessibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds tables and data grids for displaying tabular information, from simple HTML tables to complex enterprise data grids. Use when creating tables, implementing sorting/filtering/pagination, handling large datasets (10-1M+ rows), building spreadsheet-like interfaces, or designing data-heavy components. Provides performance optimization strategies, accessibility patterns (WCAG/ARIA), responsive designs, and library recommendations (TanStack Table, AG Grid).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze MSBuild binary logs to diagnose build failures. USE FOR: build errors that are unclear from console output, diagnosing cascading failures across multi-project builds, tracing MSBuild target execution order, and generally any MSBuild build issues. Requires an existing .binlog file. DO NOT USE FOR: generating binlogs (use binlog-generation), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choosing an MSBuild CopyToOutputDirectory / CopyToPublishDirectory mode: Never, PreserveNewest, Always, and IfDifferent (MSBuild 17.13+), plus $(SkipUnchangedFilesOnCopyAlways). USE FOR: removing the per-build Always copy perf hit; resetting output files mutated between builds. DO NOT USE FOR: general incremental-build diagnosis (use incremental-build); non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns; broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets); targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn); query targets returning stale results from Outputs vs Returns misuse; missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds; missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, and the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classifies existing tests by standard traits and reports their distribution. USE FOR: tagging all tests with category attributes, categorizing/tagging/ labeling each test, compare happy vs error paths, audit the test mix, describe coverage shape by test type, or tag then verify the project builds. Read bodies when names mislead. Apply canonical attributes; otherwise report only. DO NOT USE FOR: requests owned by test-anti-patterns, coverage-analysis, crap-score, test-gap-analysis, code-testing, or migration skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a persistent HeyGen avatar — a reusable face + voice identity for the agent, the user, or any named character — powered by HeyGen Avatar V technology. Prompt-based creation by default (description → HeyGen builds it); photo upload is optional for real-person digital twins. Use when: (1) giving the agent a face + voice so it can present videos ("bring yourself to life", "create your avatar", "give yourself an avatar", "design a presenter", "set up an avatar", "let's make an avatar"), (2) the user wants to appear in videos as themselves ("create my avatar", "I want my face in a video", "digital twin of me", "build me an avatar"), (3) building a named character presenter ("create an avatar called Cleo", "design a character named X"), (4) establishing HeyGen identity before making videos — the correct FIRST step when no avatar exists yet. Chain signal: when the user says both an identity/avatar action AND a video action in the same request ("create an avatar AND make a video", "set up identity THEN create a video", "design a presenter AND immediately record"), run heygen-avatar first, then heygen-video. Returns avatar_id + voice_id — pass directly to heygen-video to create HeyGen videos. NOT for: generating videos (use heygen-video), translating videos, or TTS-only tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summon shadow clones: genjutsu's full-scale pipeline for a whole website or web app, from scratch or as a full redesign. Harvests the client's real material, researches in parallel, lets Impeccable lead the direction and genjutsu the motion, builds the pages with parallel agents, then loops fixes, verdicts and a cold-eyes art director until only minor issues remain, the round cap of the chosen tier is reached, or a round fixes nothing. Announces its cost first and asks twice. Web. Needs a host that can spawn subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Running a team of subagents on one design build: clone briefs, disjoint file ownership, isolated builds, the evidence packet, review lenses, the fix plan, verdicts, cold eyes and the stop rule, with the workflow templates bunshin runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and runs Qt Quick Test (qmltestrunner / CTest) for a QML project, then writes a Markdown report. Use for "run qml tests", "run qmltestrunner".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an app, site, bot, or feature end-to-end from a dictated idea — requirements, briefing, spec, tickets, subagents, review, acceptance — with a live dashboard, for users who expect a finished result without reviewing specs or code. Starts only on /autopilot; a bare /autopilot resumes an interrupted run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an object or character reference image into a quality-gated, animation-ready procedural Three.js model built in code. Use for image-to-3D reconstruction, detail-accurate object rebuilds, stylized/likeness-maximized human characters, sculpt specs, and staged code generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a pre-meeting prep brief in Claude Code. Researches participants, pulls vault context, builds agenda, surfaces sharp questions. Use when user says "prep for this meeting," "I have a call with," "meeting tomorrow with," or "prep brief for [name/company]."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds your north star metric, a metric tree with owned input metrics and guardrails, and a review cadence, as a one-page metrics spec you can paste into a doc. Use it when you ask 'what should our north star be', 'which metric should this team goal on', 'our dashboard is a mess', 'how do we measure AI productivity', 'activation metric', 'OKR metrics', 'vanity metrics', or 'metrics review cadence'. Draws on 254 insights from 118 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Sarah Tavel, Crystal Widjaja and Jessica Lachs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an eval plan for an AI feature - error analysis on real traces, failure-mode ranking, code checks and binary LLM judges validated against human labels, CI tests, production monitoring, and a launch bar. Use when you ask how do we eval this, how do I test an AI feature, our LLM outputs are inconsistent, are the evals good enough, LLM-as-judge, hallucinations, or what accuracy is good enough to launch. Draws on 41 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Hamel Husain, Shreya Shankar and Sander Schulhoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a stakeholder map and an influence plan for getting buy-in from executives, founders, peers, engineering, sales or legal, then scripts the pitch, the pushback and the follow-up. Use it for stakeholder management, managing up, getting buy-in, handling a founder's pet idea, disagreeing with the CEO, saying no to a flood of requests, or building trust as a new PM. Draws on 140 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Jessica Fain, Jeffrey Pfeffer and Hilary Gridley.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a role scorecard, interview loop, sourcing plan, reference-check guide and close plan for a hire, and grades an existing job description or loop. Use when you say 'I need to hire a PM', 'write a job description', 'interview questions', 'how do I run references', 'first sales hire', 'first marketer', 'head of product search', 'scorecard' or 'how do I close a candidate'. Draws on 210 Lenny's Podcast guests including Adam Ward, Keith Rabois and Lauren Ipsen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a pricing model, packaging/tier structure and willingness-to-pay research plan, then grades your existing pricing page or plan. Use when you ask 'how much should we charge', 'what should our pricing model be', 'seat vs usage vs outcome pricing', 'good-better-best tiers', 'what goes in the free plan', 'should we raise prices', 'freemium vs free trial', or 'how do we price our AI product'. Draws on 199 insights from 79 Lenny's Podcast guests including Madhavan Ramanujam, Naomi Ionita and Patrick Campbell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a product strategy and stress-tests your moat, then writes a one-page strategy doc (diagnosis, where to play, how to win, guiding policy, coherent actions, moat verdicts). Use for 'we need a product strategy', 'is our moat real', 'do we have a competitive advantage', 'where should we play', 'defensibility', 'should we expand into X', 'our roadmap has no strategy', or 'write a product vision'. Draws on 909 insights from 236 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Roger Martin, Richard Rumelt and Hamilton Helmer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。