「claim」の検索結果

Verify that a watermark-removal or "humanizer" step actually removed a statistical text watermark, by measuring a sample whose key the user holds. Use after any tool, script or service claims to have cleaned a text, or when the user asks whether such a tool works, which one to trust, or how to test one. Reports a detector score against fixed thresholds plus what the run cost in meaning, facts, verbatim overlap and length. This skill only measures and never removes a mark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and apply safe Jetson headless-mode changes to reclaim GUI and daemon memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reclaim DRAM by disabling unused subsystems across MB1 BCT, MB2 BCT, kernel reserved-memory, and SWIOTLB. Use for headless or no-camera Jetson deployments; not for CPU/GPU frequency tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing DOCA version handling — detecting the installed release, validating the four-way match across pkg-config doca-common, applications/VERSION, doca_caps --version, and bfver/mlnx-release on BlueField, reasoning about NGC container tags, looking up whether a capability is on the installed release, or diagnosing build-vs-runtime drift. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly say "DOCA version" or "four-way match" — typical implicit phrasings include "program built but does nothing on the wire", "undefined reference to a symbol the docs claim exists", "DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED at runtime", "counter didn't increment", "what does `latest` mean for this tag", or "is my LTS still supported". Refuse and route elsewhere for installing or choosing DOCA packages (doca-setup), per-library API/capability questions (matching library skill), the cross-library DOCA_ERROR_* taxonomy (doca-programming-guide), or the general debug ladder (doca-debug) — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end source processing -- seed, reduce, process all claims through reflect/reweave/verify, archive. The full pipeline in one command. Triggers on "/pipeline", "/pipeline [file]", "process this end to end", "full pipeline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update old notes with new connections. The backward pass that /reflect doesn't do. Revisit existing notes that predate newer related content, add connections, sharpen claims, consider splits. Triggers on "/reweave", "/reweave [note]", "update old notes", "backward connections", "revisit notes".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Deep dive before a decision: deep research engine - grounding for specs and decisions: study open-source reference implementations with pinned refs, gather live web evidence with citation discipline, verify contested claims, and distill a decision-grounding dossier that planning consumes; for a decision brief use research-brief, for upstream guidance use web-research. Use when the user says: research plan, literature review, research literature, review recent papers, deep research, deep-research, exhaustive research, saturation research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Outdated or wrong Hermes memory entries: English-canonical Hermes memory-review guidance: inspect USER.md and MEMORY.md claims and prepare a native write diff without invoking, applying, or observing a native write; for a new fact use memory-new, and for a past decision use decision-recall. Use when the user says: memory-sync, memory curation, memory review, memory inspect, memory check, memory update, context cleanup, curate memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Imminent production launch or release: evaluate release, deploy, security, observability, rollback, docs, and support readiness without claiming production access. Use when the user says: production-audit, production audit, production readiness, prod audit, prod readiness, ready for production, ready to ship, ship readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Outdated code index or codemap: refresh local code intelligence, summarize repo structure, and prepare task-scoped codegraph handoff context without overclaiming execution. Use when the user says: codegraph-refresh, codegraph refresh, refresh codegraph, update codegraph, codegraph stale, stale codegraph, codegraph handoff, codegraph summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Dataset or table to analyze: scope supplied data with provenance, causal-claim, and hallucination guards. Use when the user says: data-analysis, data analysis, dataset analysis, csv analysis, json analysis, log analysis, table analysis, analyze csv.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check the wiki for contradictions, stale claims, orphan pages, missing cross-references, and knowledge gaps. Use periodically or when the user says 'lint the wiki' or 'check wiki health'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "figure out where our direct traffic really comes from", "measure dark social", "add a how-did-you-hear-about-us field", or "show social drives signups without click data"; produces a share-link/UTM hygiene spec for owned share surfaces, a self-reported attribution field design that replaces an existing form field (free-text first, coded later), a GA4 direct-traffic decomposition read (deep-URL directs, mobile-app skew, private-push correlation) with every derived number hard-labeled Estimated/proxy, and a branded-search-lift proxy from GSC plus Wikipedia pageviews — the declared dark-social method behind ECHO O2. Not for paid-channel attribution reconciliation (platform-claimed vs analytics conversions) — use attribution-reconciler. 暗社交归因/直接流量分解/自报来源字段/分享链路UTM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our social presence" or "is this batch safe to publish"; runs either the typed ECHO asset gate or a separate program-maturity profile, with channel-truth, claim, disclosure, manipulation, UGC-rights, and denominator checks. Not for creator deliverables — use creator-content-auditor; not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor. 社媒资产门/运营成熟度/发布前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map our positioning", "name our competitive alternatives", or "pick a beachhead segment for the launch"; produces a Dunford-style positioning canvas — named competitive alternatives (including spreadsheet and status quo), unique attributes (verifiable, or routed to the claims ledger), value themes (attribute→benefit→value chains), a target beachhead segment scored on serviceability / pain intensity / reachability, and a one-sentence onlyness statement — the sole upstream of the message house and the entity-signal source for the canonical entity profile. Not for the message house or per-channel launch copy — use message-house-builder; not for audience/persona profiling itself — use audience-mapper; not for SEO keyword positioning — use keyword-research. 定位画布/竞争替代品/独特价值/滩头细分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "make everyone tell the same story", "write our elevator pitch ladder", or "build a spokesperson Q&A and approved boilerplate pack"; derives from the narrative-registry canon, message house, and brand voice a repeatable enablement kit — an elevator ladder (10-second / 30-second / 2-minute), a spokesperson Q&A (tough questions with on-canon answers), an approved boilerplate/bio pack (25 / 50 / 100-word), and a do/don't language sheet — so sales, support, founders, and partners repeat one consistent story. Not for the launch-day runbook — use launch-day-conductor; not for finished per-channel copy — use content-writer or each discipline creative builder; not for launch-window battle cards — use sales-enablement-kit; this kit never adjudicates a claim. 叙事赋能包/电梯梯度/发言人问答/审定样板/该说不该说

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write the email", "draft subject lines", or "build email creative"; produces the pre-click unit — subject-line variants + preheader, body copy, one clear CTA, and a plain-text alt — message-matched to the destination page and claims-ledger-aware. Not for pre-scoring or ranking subject-line variants (spam/truncation/render pre-score) — use subject-line-lab; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor; not for the multi-step flow — use email-sequence-designer; not for the A/B test plan — use send-experiment-designer. 邮件文案/主题行/邮件创意

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit an email program" or "is this campaign safe to send"; runs a typed 20-item SEND profile with authentication, consent, opt-out, and claim veto checks on own evidence. Not for building deliverability setup — use deliverability-qa; not for designing lifecycle flows — use email-sequence-designer. 邮件质量审计/EQS评分/发送前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-grow a pro-workflow wiki by running a budget-capped BFS research loop over pluggable source fetchers (web, arXiv, GitHub). Each iteration pops a seed from the queue, fetches sources, drafts a wiki page, dedupes claims against existing pages, enqueues follow-up seeds. Halts on budget cap, depth cap, or convergence. Use when the user says "research <topic>", "grow the <slug> wiki", "auto-research", or wants a knowledge base that builds itself overnight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。