「code quality」の検索結果

Applies the Refactoring Priority Premise (RPP) levels L1-L6 for systematic code refactoring. Use when improving code quality through structured refactoring passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a codebase's modularity imbalances using the Balanced Coupling model and produces a review of design issues. Use when reviewing existing code for coupling problems, assessing architecture quality, identifying distributed monolith risks, or finding areas where changes are unexpectedly expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to review or clean up R code for tidyverse style, standardize formatting or names, remove redundant comments or wrappers, or make a behavior-preserving style pass. Also use when writing substantial new R package code if the user requests tidyverse style or the package already follows it. Not for routine small edits or general correctness, security, or test-quality reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use webhint in .NET repositories that ship browser-facing frontends. Use when a repo needs CLI audits for accessibility, performance, security headers, PWA signals, SEO, or runtime page quality against a. USE FOR: the repo ships a browser-facing site and the user asks about accessibility, performance, SEO, security headers, or page quality; the repo has .hintrc, hint scripts, or a. DO NOT USE FOR: JavaScript or TypeScript semantic linting; route that to eslint or biome; stylesheet-only linting; route that to stylelint. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides file paths to language-specific reference files for the test ANALYSIS skills (assertion-quality, test-anti-patterns, test-gap-analysis, test-smell-detection, test-tagging). Read this catalog to discover available extension files (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET/MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit, python.md for pytest/unittest, typescript.md for Jest/Vitest/Mocha, java.md for JUnit/TestNG, etc.). Do not invoke this reference-only skill — its bundled files are read by the quality agent and analysis skills needing framework-specific lookup tables (test markers, assertion APIs, skip annotations, sleep patterns, mystery guest indicators, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag-support capability).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml; Configure Maven quality plugins in pom.xml; Add Maven build lifecycle plugins for Java verification; Review Maven plugin versions and executions. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an object or character reference image into a quality-gated, animation-ready procedural Three.js model built in code. Use for image-to-3D reconstruction, detail-accurate object rebuilds, stylized/likeness-maximized human characters, sculpt specs, and staged code generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick an LM output format per (task x consumer x model) rather than by reflex: different formats carry different cognitive load (e.g. code-in-JSON makes the same model write worse code than plain-text+diff, while asking for prose when you need a typed object fails the other way). Use when designing or debugging an LM's output schema, choosing between plain text / diff / JSON / tool-call / grammar-constrained output, or when a model's quality drops after wrapping its output in a structured format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backend-neutral image generation: create new raster images and looping GIF/WebP animations through the local one-file image-use CLI (formerly chatgpt-imagegen), using the user's ChatGPT subscription by default, the Codex backend as fallback, or an optional Gemini subscription — no API key or daemon. Triggers: image generation, generate an image, draw a picture, 画图, 画一张, 生成图片, 生图, 配图. Use for photos, illustrations, icons, hero banners, mockups, sprites, concept art, animation loops, and figures for documents, proposals, blog posts, or READMEs; save outputs in the workspace. Auto mode uses the logged-in ChatGPT browser via chrome-use. Gemini users can pass --backend gemini or agy. Proactively propose useful figures while authoring long-form content. Do not use for editing existing images, SVG/vector work, code-native graphics, established icon systems, explicit high-quality or transparent API output, or end-user image-generation services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Bedrock AgentCore comprehensive expert for deploying and managing AI agents at scale. Use when working with any AgentCore service including Gateway, Runtime, Memory, Identity, Code Interpreter, Browser, Observability, Agent Registry, or Evaluations. Covers agent deployment, MCP tool integration, credential management, agent discovery, governance workflows, and automated quality assessment. Essential when user mentions AgentCore, agent runtime, agent registry, agent evaluation, MCP gateway, deploy agent, register MCP server, discover agents, evaluate agent quality, agent credentials, or wants to build, deploy, catalog, or monitor AI agents on AWS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pull requests for code quality, security issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes, or analyzing diffs before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Updates documentation after code changes with quality gates, slop detection, and accuracy checks. Use when code changes require corresponding doc updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates multi-domain review (code, arch, tests, security) in a single pass. Use when thorough pre-release review is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies stewardship virtues (Care, Curiosity, Humility, Diligence) to plugin work. Use when authoring plugins or reviewing code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Claude Code rules in .claude/rules/. Use for frontmatter, globs, and quality audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality academic Beamer slides from a thesis/paper (PDF, Word, or LaTeX source). Compatible with Claude Code and Codex. Supports thesis defense, proposal presentations, and conference talks. Built-in layout library with 13 professional page types, 5 color schemes, and interactive editing loop. Use when: (1) User asks to create thesis defense slides/PPT, (2) User wants to generate academic presentation from a paper, (3) User mentions beamer, 答辩PPT, 学术报告, 开题PPT, 论文幻灯片, or academic slides, (4) User has a PDF/docx/tex thesis and wants presentation output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。