「controls」の検索結果

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent code safely in isolated sandboxes with resource limits, audit trails, and kill switches. Use when someone asks to "sandbox my agent", "run agent code safely", "add guardrails to AI agent", "isolate agent execution", "audit agent actions", "prevent agent from deleting files", "restrict agent permissions", or "add safety controls to AI coding agent". Covers Docker isolation, filesystem restrictions, network policies, resource locking, and comprehensive audit logging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GraphQL gives clients exactly the data they need - no more, no less. One endpoint, typed schema, introspection. But the flexibility that makes it powerful also makes it dangerous. Without proper controls, clients can craft queries that bring down your server. This skill covers schema design, resolvers, DataLoader for N+1 prevention, federation for microservices, and client integration with Apollo/urql. Key insight: GraphQL is a contract. The schema is the API documentation. Design it carefully. 2025 lesson: GraphQL isn't always the answer. For simple CRUD, REST is simpler. For high-performance public APIs, REST with caching wins. Use GraphQL when you have complex data relationships and diverse client needs. Use when "graphql, graphql schema, graphql resolver, apollo server, apollo client, graphql federation, dataloader, graphql codegen, graphql query, graphql mutation, graphql, api, apollo, schema, resolvers, dataloader, federation, typescript" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refuses "flaky" as a diagnosis. Turns an intermittent failure into a reproduction by isolating it from the environment, naming the variable that controls it, forcing that variable, and measuring before and after with enough runs to count. Separates real defects from environment contention with evidence, and never retries to green or widens a threshold. Use when a test, performance check, or deploy step fails intermittently or passes on rerun.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding a minigame (snake, quiz, puzzle, timing/reaction game, ...) to a Pixi'VN visual novel — the `useMinigame` lifecycle hook pattern, using PixiJS directly on its own layer instead of `gameLayer`, hotkeys for controls, linking the minigame to a route, and why saving/restoring minigame state is the developer's own responsibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-model a sensitive design with STRIDE on request. Read-only analysis of threats, controls, and implementation constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The banned-primitive gate. Routed to when changed code hashes, signs, encrypts, derives keys, generates security-relevant randomness, configures TLS, or imports a crypto library. Rejects broken primitives, disabled TLS verification, and home-rolled crypto; the approved-primitive list lives in security-controls.md. The auth-crypto-reviewer agent is dispatched as the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-model a sensitive design with STRIDE on request. Read-only analysis of threats, controls, and implementation constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned referral and affiliate program discipline. Use when designing refer-a-friend mechanics, ambassador or partner incentives, fraud controls, attribution, payout logic, or viral-loop measurement. NOT FOR: executing payouts or changing billing, launch-wide packaging (use suede-launch-packaging), lifecycle messaging (use suede-emails), or reporting unverified referral lift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect, stream, and explicitly adjust live Android UI tweak values or invoke app-owned actions through Snap-O. Use when a request mentions Snap-O Tweaks, tweak-enabled Android apps, runtime UI parameters, Compose tweak or action controls, tweak discovery, previously adjusted or currently inactive tweaks, applying all user-made tweak changes, typed values, defaults or resets, tweak batches, explicitly registered actions, the Tweaks REST/SSE API, or selecting between CLI, macOS tool, in-app overlay, and custom tweak interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding controls, menus, HUD, subtitles or effects - input through named actions with rebinding and controller support per engine, input buffering, and the accessibility floor (remapping, colour-blind safe cues, subtitles, text scale, reduced motion and flashes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Encrypt PDFs with AES-128, AES-256, or RC4 options and decrypt authorized PDFs with ComPDF. Use for PDF passwords, permission controls, encryption, decryption, and document-access protection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares and controls software releases with risk classification, CI quality gates, artifact provenance, feature flags, staged rollout, measurable promotion and rollback thresholds, post-deploy verification, and cleanup. Use for deployment pipelines, launch readiness, canaries, production rollout, release automation, or rollback planning. Not for merely merging a completed development branch or proving one local change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs transactional email systems and send infrastructure. Use when implementing resets, receipts, deliverability controls, templates, or inbound email handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs operating models for AI in product teams. Use when planning platform ownership, provider strategy, data boundaries, evals, or sensitive-data controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs lakehouse platforms across Iceberg, Delta, Hudi, and Paimon. Use when choosing catalogs, CDC paths, query engines, governance, or cost controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses DPO, GRPO/RLVR, reward models, and over-optimization controls. Use when adapting a pretrained or SFT model with preference or verifiable reward signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing regulatory compliance (SOC2/PCI-DSS/HIPAA/ISO 27001): maps requirements, checks controls, designs audit trails, implements Policy as Code. Use when compliance auditing is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assessing standards, regulatory controls, and legal-document coverage with cited evidence and proposed wording. Use for OWASP/WCAG/SOC2/PCI/HIPAA or ToS/privacy/DPA reviews; not legal advice or code fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest whether Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build is a useful next collaborator, without launching a CLI or changing controls. Use when comparing the three CLIs, planning a handoff, or deciding whether an independent implementation or review would help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the insurance product design, payout terms, and pricing assumptions for viability and profitability. Use when critiquing thesis, economics, risk controls, underwriting assumptions, premium strategy, and solvency posture of this vehicle insurance protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when identifying cybersecurity-specific regulations and incident reporting obligations. Covers NIS2, DORA, SEC cyber disclosure rules, CISA incident reporting, state breach notification laws, cyber insurance requirements, and security certification frameworks. USE FOR: NIS2, DORA, SEC cybersecurity rules, CISA, breach notification, incident reporting, SOC 2, ISO 27001, cyber insurance, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, CMMC, data breach response DO NOT USE FOR: implementing security controls (use security skills), security testing tools (use security/security-testing), general data privacy (use privacy-data-protection)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。