「egress」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Database Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Database Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from storage hierarchy, concurrency semantics, query-optimization theory, and declared workload models through TPC-C/H, YCSB, and JOB benchmarks, Jepsen/Elle correctness checkers, and perf/blktrace/fio profiling while treating cardinality-estimation plan regressions, tail-latency spikes under skew, unfair fsync-disabled speedups, and benchmark-trick wins as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Bioinformatics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Bioinformatics Engineer judgment. Builds production genomics DAGs in Nextflow/nf-core, Snakemake, and WDL/Cromwell with digest-pinned containers, GIAB regression CI (nf-test, pytest), QC-gated MultiQC runbooks, and CLIA-grade provenance—distinct from analyst-focused bioinformatician DE/GWAS reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs time-to-event analysis for clinical trials including Cox proportional hazards regression with PH diagnostics, restricted mean survival time (RMST) under non-PH, competing risks via Fine-Gray vs cause-specific Cox, weighted log-rank and MaxCombo for non-proportional hazards, recurrent events (Andersen-Gill, PWP, WLW), and interval-censored data. Use when analyzing time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, DOR, TTR, TTNT) in oncology or other clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end clinical trial analysis workflow from CDISC SDTM/ADaM loading through ICH E9(R1) estimand-driven primary analysis to CONSORT 2025 regulatory-compliant reporting. Covers data preparation, FDA 2023 marginal vs conditional logistic regression, categorical tests with Boschloo, modern HTE/subgroup methods, missing-data sensitivity (MMRM, reference-based MI, Permutt tipping point), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), survival analysis (Cox/RMST/competing risks) when applicable, and Table 1. Use when performing a complete analysis of clinical trial data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with PLINK. Perform case-control and quantitative trait association testing using logistic/linear regression with covariates, generate Manhattan and QQ plots for result visualization. Use when running GWAS or association tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression with lifelines. Builds survival models from clinical and omics features. Use when predicting patient survival or modeling time-to-event outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites — navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, sharing a live browser view, narrating browser actions, extracting structured data, running assertions, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", "visual regression test", "check for prompt injection", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing REPL clear/reset/resume/surface behavior (onClearTerminal, transcriptSeq remount, Ink Static paths, Ctrl+O/Ctrl+E transitions). Enforces single-owner reset transaction and prevents black-screen/flicker/duplicate-row regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish baseline → snapshot → compare → history monitoring for any KPI, config, or metric that can drift during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to monitor drift, baseline a value for later comparison, or when user asks "how do we track if X changes?", "baseline this", "config drift", "performance regression", "metric drift", "compare to last week", "is this getting worse?". Outputs MON-DRIFT-* entries with baseline + comparison rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for bugs, regressions, convention violations, and high-value cleanup opportunities. Use for diffs, commit ranges, hosted PR/MR URLs, branches, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance with axe-core + Playwright, keyboard navigation audits, screen reader testing, ARIA pattern validation, and legal compliance mapping (ADA, EAA, Section 508). Automated tools catch 30-40% of issues — this skill covers automated and manual testing together. Use when: "accessibility," "a11y," "WCAG," "screen reader," "axe," "keyboard navigation," "ARIA," "ADA compliance." Not for: cookie-consent/GDPR compliance — use compliance-testing; pixel-diff visual regression — use visual-testing. Related: playwright-automation, compliance-testing, visual-testing, ci-cd-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate that analytics and marketing tracking fire CORRECTLY: GA4/GTM dataLayer events, Meta/TikTok/LinkedIn pixels, and ad-tech tags. Covers building a tracking plan as the contract, intercepting collect-endpoint beacons and dataLayer.push in Playwright, asserting event name + params + values + timing + de-duplication, Consent Mode v2 gating, CI regression gating, and news-media events (article-view, scroll-depth, paywall). Use when: "test analytics tracking," "GA4 event test," "verify the pixel fires," "dataLayer test," "tracking plan," "Meta Pixel dedup," "scroll-depth tracking test," "gate tracking in CI." Not for: whether tracking is ALLOWED to fire under consent law (GDPR/CMP) — that is compliance-testing; this skill checks the data is CORRECT. SEO meta tags / structured data — out of scope. Related: compliance-testing, playwright-automation, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application performance with k6 load/stress/soak/spike scripts and k6 scenarios, Lighthouse CI for Web Vitals, and performance budgets as CI gates. Covers load profiles, custom metrics, bottleneck identification, and Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS). Use when: "performance test," "load test," "stress test," "soak test," "spike test," "k6," "k6 scenarios," "Lighthouse," "Web Vitals," "Core Web Vitals," "performance budget." Not for: scheduled production probes — use synthetic-monitoring; pixel-diff regressions — use visual-testing; designing tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, release-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full implementation verification pass after code or data changes. Use when the user asks to verify, QA, smoke test, run checks, validate a feature, inspect a local app in the browser, capture screenshots, or turn discovered QA issues into regression tests/checklists with user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', '为什么这么设计', design rationale, regressions, or where a magic number came from. Fans out one investigator per evidence category — in this repo that starts with the local decision record (ADRs, docs/design, the daemon issue store, the changelog, wisp) plus git history, and adds MCP-backed categories when the session has them — then returns a cited read with the gaps named. Use `how` for what the code does at runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the cause of a hard bug by running several read-only subagents in parallel, each attacking it from a different angle (change history, code path, data and state, environment, reproduction), then checking their evidence, ranking the hypotheses and naming the one experiment that would confirm the leader. It diagnoses and does not fix. Use when someone says "hunt this bug with multiple agents", "swarm on this regression", "investigate in parallel", "find the root cause", or when a failure is intermittent, crosses components, or has resisted a first look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Braintrust is a hosted platform for evaluating and tracing LLM applications: it runs a task over a dataset, scores the outputs, stores each run as an experiment and logs production traces. Use when a user asks to write or run a Braintrust eval, score LLM outputs with autoevals, compare prompt or model versions as experiments, run evals in CI and fail on regressions, trace OpenAI or Anthropic calls with Braintrust, manage evaluation datasets, or use the bt CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为已有 PageObject 增量添加回归测试点。触发：新增测试点、添加回归点、add test point、增加覆盖、扩展页面方法。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request for correctness, regressions, and missing tests. Use when a mid-level developer needs structured review guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply semi-formal certificate reasoning to code analysis — patch verification, fault localization, patch equivalence. Use when reviewing patches, hunting bugs across scopes, comparing fixes, or when code reasoning requires tracing execution across files/modules. Triggers on code review, bug localization, patch comparison, name shadowing, scope analysis, regression checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which model, effort level, and cascade shape each subagent gets, and how to keep improvement loops safe (evaluator-as-selector, stop on regression). Routes on measured cost-per-completed-task rather than per-token price, because a tier's token count varies more by task shape than price varies across tiers. Covers per-model effort semantics, the concision lever, cascade preconditions, context handoff, and watching a subagent fan-out live. Use when choosing a subagent's model or effort, when choosing how to escalate a failed attempt, or when asked which model or effort a task should get. Grounded in a 2026-07 calibration, a 2026-08 coding-cost study, a 2026-09 seeded-bug repair battery, a 2026-10 Haiku 5.5 ladder priced per spawn, and a 2026-10 retry-versus-escalation ladder on 295 SWE-bench Verified tasks; Managed Agents API specifics are operational, not calibrated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。