877 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Cloudflare Workers is an edge computing platform for running JavaScript, TypeScript, and WebAssembly close to users worldwide with sub-millisecond cold starts. Use when working with the Workers runtime, the Wrangler CLI, KV, D1, R2, Durable Objects, Queues, or Hyperdrive, or when a user asks to build and deploy an edge function.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
I am a veteran print production specialist with 15+ years in tabletop game manufacturing. I've shepherded hundreds of games from digital files to retail-ready products, working with manufacturers from The Game Crafter to Panda GM to Cartamundi. My expertise spans the entire production pipeline: color management, dieline creation, paper selection, finishing techniques, component nesting, insert design, and the critical art of the unboxing experience. I've learned the hard way about RGB-to-CMYK disasters, registration drift, humidity warp, and minimum font sizes that become illegible smudges. I know the difference between 280gsm blue-core and 320gsm black-core card stock by feel. I can tell you why your rich black needs to be C60-M40-Y40-K100, not just K100. I understand why your box needs 15mm clearance on each dimension, and why that gorgeous neon green in your design will become a muddy olive in print. Use when "print my game, packaging design, prepare files for print, dieline, print specifications, board game manufacturing, card game printing, box design, bleed and safe area, CMYK conversion, paper stock, card finish, foil stamping, embossing, unboxing experience, thermoform insert, punchboard design, component manufacturing, Panda GM, Game Crafter, Cartamundi, print-production, packaging, manufacturing, board-games, card-games, cmyk, dieline, die-cutting, offset-printing, tabletop" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
What makes founders succeed? Paul Graham has observed thousands of founders and distilled patterns. Relentlessly resourceful. Fierce nerds. Earnest. These traits matter more than credentials or connections. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder character into actionable guidance for developing the traits that predict success. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class caching strategies - cache invalidation, Redis patterns, CDN caching, and the battle scars from cache bugs that served stale data for hoursUse when "cache, caching, redis, memcached, cdn, ttl, invalidation, stale, cache aside, write through, cache stampede, thundering herd, cache warming, etag, cache-control, caching, redis, memcached, cdn, performance, http-cache, ttl, invalidation" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-head SEO comparison of two domains powered by the DataForSEO API. Side-by-side metrics across keywords, traffic, backlinks, referring domains, and shared keyword overlap with a verdict on which domain has the stronger SEO position.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
半导体芯片制造工艺 (Semiconductor Process Engineering / 半导体芯片制造工艺 — 以「物理化学极限 + 良率经济双重约束」为特征的集成电路前道/后道制造工艺认知操作系统：从「器件架构与微缩路线（planar→FinFET→GAA nanosheet→CFET、等效微缩 DTCO/STCO、背面供电 BSPDN）→ 工艺整合（FEOL/MOL/BEOL 模块协同、PDK、流片 tape-out）→ 单元工艺（光刻 litho（DUV 浸没式 193i / EUV 13.5nm / 多重曝光 SADP-SAQP / OPC / mask）、刻蚀 etch（RIE/ICP/原子层刻蚀 ALE）、薄膜沉积 depo（CVD/PECVD/LPCVD/ALD/PVD/外延 epi/电镀 Cu）、掺杂 doping（离子注入 ion implant / 退火 RTA-laser anneal）、CMP 化学机械抛光、清洗 cleaning）→ 量测检测 metrology（CD-SEM / OCD / overlay / 椭偏 ellipsometry / 缺陷检测 defect inspection / e-beam）→ 良率工程 yield（缺陷密度 / SPC 统计过程控制 / FDC / APC / DOE 实验设计 / 良率爬坡 yield ramp）→ 先进封装 advanced packaging（2.5D/3D、CoWoS、HBM、混合键合 hybrid bonding、chiplet、TSV）」的完整器件-工艺-良率-量产决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **物理/化学/材料的硬约束（量子隧穿、短沟道效应、RC 延迟、热预算、缺陷物理、ppb 级污染控制）⇄ 良率/成本/产能的经济约束（每片晶圆成本、良率是主经济指标、D0 缺陷密度、wafer-per-hour、折旧）**；**持续微缩/摩尔定律（dimensional + equivalent scaling、节点路线图 N5/N3/N2/A16/A14、high-NA EUV）⇄ 物理极限/微缩放缓（原子尺度、漏电、功耗墙、成本墙、'摩尔定律已死'之争）**；**协同优化/整合（DTCO 设计-工艺协同、STCO 系统-工艺协同、模块间 trade-off）⇄ 单模块极致优化（单一 unit process 工艺窗口）**；**工艺配方的 tacit 手艺（process recipe 调试、工艺窗口、缺陷根因分析、量产 ramp 的经验）⇄ 可建模/可仿真/数据驱动（TCAD 仿真、ML 良率分析、APC/FDC、数字孪生）**；**性能-功耗-面积-成本 PPAC 四角权衡 ⇄ 良率/可制造性 DFM 优先**；**自主可控/国产替代（卡脖子、EUV 出口管制、设备/材料/EDA 国产化、SMIC/长江存储/长鑫/中微/北方华创/上海微电子）⇄ 全球高度分工（ASML 光刻垄断、AMAT/Lam/TEL/KLA 设备、TSMC/Samsung/Intel 代工、全球供应链）**。(b) 核心工作流 / pipeline（最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化）— 新节点/新工艺导入：器件目标与 PPAC 定义 → 工艺整合方案与 PDK → 单元工艺开发与配方调试（DOE 找工艺窗口）→ 量测建立与 SPC → 良率爬坡（缺陷分类 + 根因分析 + 工艺改善）→ 量产移交与持续改善。具体单元工艺 SOP：光刻（曝光条件 / OPC / overlay 控制 / 多重曝光分解）、刻蚀（选择比 / profile / loading effect / ALE）、沉积（台阶覆盖 / 应力 / 均匀性）、CMP（去除速率 / 碟形 dishing / 侵蚀 erosion）、量测与缺陷分析、良率分析与 FA 失效分析。(c) 工具栈 — 设备（光刻 ASML/上海微电子 SMEE；刻蚀+沉积 AMAT/Lam/TEL/中微 AMEC/北方华创 Naura；离子注入 AMAT/Axcelis；CMP AMAT/荏原 Ebara；量测检测 KLA/AMAT/中科飞测/上海精测）、EDA/TCAD/仿真（Synopsys Sentaurus/Silvaco/Coventor SEMulator3D、OPC Calibre/Synopsys）、良率与制造软件（SPC、MES、FDC/APC、缺陷分析 yield management、PWS）、材料（光刻胶 photoresist、CMP 浆料 slurry、特气、靶材、掩膜 mask blank）。(d) 知识正典 — 半导体工艺 canon 横跨器件物理与制造工程：核心教材（Plummer/Deal/Griffin《Silicon VLSI Technology》、Sze《Physics of Semiconductor Devices》《VLSI Technology》、Wolf & Tauber《Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era》、Campbell《Fabrication Engineering at the Micro and Nanoscale》、May & Spanos《Fundamentals of Semiconductor Manufacturing and Process Control》、Quirk & Serda《Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology》、肖国勇/施敏中文教材）、路线图（ITRS/IRDS、IEEE 国际器件与系统路线图）、顶会论文（IEDM、Symposium on VLSI Technology、IRPS 可靠性、SPIE Advanced Lithography、ISSCC、DAC）、行业分析（SemiAnalysis、TechInsights、IC Knowledge）。(e) figures/流派 — 学术与器件奠基（Gordon Moore 摩尔、Robert Dennard 登纳德微缩、胡正明 Chenming Hu FinFET/UTB-SOI 发明人 UC Berkeley、刘明 Tsu-Jae King Liu Berkeley、Krishna Saraswat Stanford、Mark Bohr Intel 工艺架构）、产业领袖与工艺大师（张忠谋 Morris Chang TSMC、林本坚 Burn-Jeng Lin 浸没式光刻、Martin van den Brink ASML、米玉杰/梁孟松 SMIC/三星工艺、Mark Liu/魏哲家 TSMC）、行业分析师（Dylan Patel SemiAnalysis、Scotten Jones IC Knowledge、TechInsights 拆解、Handel Jones）、科普与拆解（Asianometry、The Chip Letter、半导体行业观察）。流派分歧：等效微缩派 vs 摩尔定律已死派、前道微缩 vs 先进封装 chiplet 异构集成、dimensional scaling vs DTCO 协同优化、IDM vs 纯代工 foundry 模式、自主可控/国产替代路线 vs 全球分工。(f) 行业话术/黑话 — 制程节点 node / 流片 tape-out / 工艺窗口 process window / 良率 yield / 缺陷密度 D0 / 关键尺寸 CD / 套刻 overlay / 掩膜 reticle-mask / 光刻胶 PR / 浸没式 immersion / EUV/DUV / 多重曝光 multi-patterning SADP-SAQP / OPC / 刻蚀选择比 selectivity / profile / loading effect / 原子层刻蚀 ALE / 台阶覆盖 step coverage / 外延 epi / 离子注入 implant / 退火 anneal / RTA / CMP / dishing-erosion / FEOL-MOL-BEOL / FinFET / GAA / 纳米片 nanosheet / CFET / 背面供电 BSPDN / high-NA / PPAC / DTCO-STCO / DFM / SPC / FDC-APC / DOE / WAT-PCM / 良率爬坡 yield ramp / FA 失效分析 / particle 颗粒 / 洁净室 cleanroom-级别 / 12寸-8寸 wafer / chiplet / CoWoS / HBM / 混合键合 hybrid bonding / TSV / PDK / 等效微缩. (g) 争议/批判 — 「摩尔定律是否已死 vs 等效微缩继续」、「节点命名营销化（N3/N2 ≠ 物理 3nm/2nm，gate pitch/metal pitch 才是真尺度）」、「前道微缩 vs 先进封装异构集成谁是未来」、「自主可控/国产替代的现实（EUV 卡脖子、设备/材料/EDA 国产化进度、出口管制 entity list、良率与成熟度差距）」、「良率/成本/性能三角权衡」、「人才稀缺与工艺 know-how 的 tacit 性」、「中国大基金/产能扩张是否过剩」、「制裁与技术封锁」。(h) 大量隐性工艺手艺（process recipe 调试与工艺窗口寻找、缺陷根因分析与 FA、量产良率爬坡的经验判
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load at the start of any task whose deliverable is prose another person will read — a PR description, commit message, README, doc, postmortem, blog post, issue or review comment, report, release note or essay — before drafting it, whether the result is pushed, posted, published or saved to a file, without being asked. Draft, then run this pass on the draft before handing it over. Also use when someone says "de-claude", "de-slop", "humanize this", "this reads like AI", "make it sound human", or asks for a voice, tone or register edit. Rewrites the constructions that mark prose as model-written (staged reveals, verdict headers, aphoristic closers, "it's not X, it's Y", em-dash drama, forced triads, flat-certainty adverbs) into plain technical prose and checks the rewrite kept every claim. Not for fiction, poetry, code, or quoted text; for a full adversarial review of a deliverable use challenging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a diff with the reviewer fleet, funneled to one triaged verdict. Targets the current working diff, a path, or an inbound GitHub PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The parallel fan-out primitive. Routed to by any skill or command that splits work across independent units and dispatches an agent per unit — subagent-driven-development, /sprint, parallel /review. It owns the dispatch/collect/funnel discipline: bound concurrency, isolate units, collect every result, dedupe overlap, and funnel through finding-triage then the read-only verdict-aggregator. Raw agent output is never consumed before the funnel runs; an agent that errors records its unit as incomplete without corrupting the batch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when installing, bootstrapping, configuring, starting, verifying, operating, or troubleshooting Looper, looperd, the looper CLI, ~/.looper config, or runtime paths; when setting up Looper with opencode, claude-code, codex, cursor-cli, Grok Build, Pi, or Oh My Pi (omp); when registering repos or configuring planner/reviewer/fixer/worker loops; or when diagnosing status, logs, osascript, git, gh, LOOPER_TOKEN, writable path, or daemon startup issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check product and brand names for conflicts across trademarks, domains, social handles, and package registries. Returns a risk level and Proceed/Modify/Abandon verdict. Don't use for name brainstorming, logo design, or trademark filings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Herdr loops for one open GitHub issue (resolve→review→fix) or an existing PR (review→lazy fixer) until CLEAN. Don't use for plain resolution without review, review-only/no-fix requests, backlog automation, or merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 王建硕 wants to evaluate whether a change to VoiceDrop's 挖矿 system prompt is actually better than the live version — runs the local eval harness (golden fixtures × champion-vs-candidate, same input), dispatches blind pairwise judge subagents, aggregates a win-rate verdict, and on approval promotes the candidate into agent/src/prompts/mine.js. Triggers — "评估 prompt"、"挖矿 prompt 改好了吗"、"eval prompt"、"比一比两版 prompt"、"/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 王建硕 wants to systematically grow his X (Twitter) followers by running numbered, A/B-testable growth experiments and tracking which ones actually work. Every action gets a number, a hypothesis, a target metric, a before-state (for rollback), and a verdict. The North-Star metric is the new-follower ÷ profile-visit ratio (conversion) — every profile change is judged against it. Daily it ingests the X Analytics CSV export, scores each running experiment, and recommends keep / rollback. Triggers — "涨粉", "增加 X 粉丝", "X 涨粉实验", "follower growth", "A/B test my profile", "今天的涨粉检查", "/wjs-x-increasing-follower".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。