「figures」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a set of questions (form exports, helpdesk logs, meeting Q and A, chat threads, a plain list) plus the source documents the user supplies into a DRAFT FAQ grouped by theme: every answer quoted or paraphrased from a named source with a reference, verbatim quotes for dates, figures, eligibility and obligations, UNKNOWN where the sources are silent, a source register with precedence, a conflicts table and a routing list of unanswered questions to owners. Use when the user asks to "build an FAQ from these documents", "answer these questions from the policy", "turn the Q and A into an FAQ page", "group these questions and answer them from the guide" or "what do our documents say about these questions". Do not use for the manager FAQ of a changed HR policy, use policy-change-briefing instead; for checking whether a document's own claims are evidenced, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a cash forecast (spreadsheet, model export, pasted table or the narrative that accompanies it) and returns a DRAFT assumptions sheet: every assumption the forecast rests on, stated or implied by the figures, with its value as read, its location in the model, the cash lines it drives, its stated source or "not stated", the evidence that would test it, an owner, and one neutral challenge question, so a reviewer can work through the assumptions one by one. Use when the user asks to "list the assumptions behind this cash forecast", "what is this cash flow forecast assuming", "prepare the challenge questions for the treasury review", "pull out the drivers of the 13-week cash forecast" or "build an assumptions register for the liquidity plan". Do not use for actuals against budget by line, use budget-variance-explainer instead; do not use for the case behind a capital request, use capex-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an actuals-versus-budget extract (spreadsheet, export or pasted table) into a DRAFT variance table with absolute and percentage variances, favourable or adverse marking and a ranking by size, then drafts plain-language driver hypotheses for each material variance as questions to verify with a named owner, never as asserted causes. Use when the user asks to "explain these variances", "why are we over budget on this line", "write the variance commentary for the management pack", "actuals versus budget analysis" or "which lines drive the variance". Do not use for a dataset with no budget or comparison column, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for weekly operational figures against last week, use kpi-weekly-report-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English. Also covers LaTeX layout/typesetting (排版) fixes — loose or sparse pages, stranded section headings, figures that don't fill the page or split across pages, "Float too large", multi-panel figure arrangement, and Supplementary Information that looks empty — via references/latex-layout.md. Also trigger on general academic/scientific writing requests even without the word "Nature", including academic writing, scientific writing, SCI/paper writing, English manuscript polishing, language editing, proofreading, and Chinese phrasings such as 学术写作、科研写作、论文润色、写paper、SCI写作、英文论文润色、语言润色、润色、改写、学术英语、英文写作.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a complete but efficient Nature-style Chinese PPTX presentation from a remote-sensing, Earth-observation, geospatial AI, or broader scientific paper, preprint, PDF, article text, abstract, figure legends, or reading notes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to make slides/PPT/PPTX for journal club, group meeting, paper sharing, thesis seminar, lab meeting, department report, or academic presentation from a remote-sensing research paper. It identifies the paper type and argument, selects only the figures needed for the story, writes Chinese slide content and speaker notes, creates the actual .pptx deck, and runs an explicit self-review/corrective revision loop focused on figure quality, text overflow prevention, and non-template visual design before delivery. Also trigger on general academic-presentation requests even without the word "Nature", such as turning a paper into slides, building an academic talk deck, conference/defense presentations, and Chinese phrasings like 论文做PPT、遥感论文汇报、组会PPT、文献汇报、学术汇报、做幻灯片、讲paper、读书报告PPT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build full-paper Chinese-English side-by-side, figure/table-aware, source-grounded Markdown readers for journal or conference papers from PDF, DOI, arXiv, publisher HTML, or pasted text. Use whenever the user asks to translate or read a paper, make 中英文对照/原文对照/全文翻译解读, extract figures or tables into the right positions, preserve figure/table placement near relevant prose, or keep exact source anchors for every block. This skill must not degrade into a summary-only output unless the user explicitly asks for a summary. Also trigger on general paper-reading and translation requests even without the word "Nature", such as reading/translating an academic paper, literature reading, understanding a paper, and Chinese phrasings like 读论文、精读论文、论文翻译、文献翻译、文献阅读、学术阅读、帮我读这篇文章、翻译这篇paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce publication-style figures from MIKE+ .res1d results via the mike-plus MCP server — a stacked rainfall-runoff hydrograph, a single time series, a network map, a baseline-vs-scenario overlay, or a longitudinal profile (bed / crown / ground / max water level along a pipe string), in the house style (Arial 12, ticks inward, SI units, no title). Use when an agent must render MIKE+ results as a PNG without opening the GUI. No license required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record provenance for an Agentic MIKE+ step via the mike-plus MCP server — a manifest.json tying the model copy, inputs, edits, run QA status, result files and figures together, each file with a sha256. Use at the end of every run/compare/plot task (successful or failed) so the work can be audited, re-compared or reproduced later. No license required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures the JetFormBuilder action events system — the named events (DEFAULT.PROCESS, DEFAULT.REQUIRED, GATEWAY.SUCCESS, GATEWAY.FAILED, BAD.REQUEST, ON.DYNAMIC_STATE, never) that decide WHEN a Form Action runs. Covers declaring supported / unsupported / required events on a custom action, the validation precedence inside Base_Event::is_valid_action(), the multi-event subscription model the action editor exposes, and how to register a brand-new event type via the 'jet-form-builder/event-types' filter using Base_Event, Base_Action_Event, or Base_Gateway_Event. Use when an action needs to run only on payment callbacks, only on validation failure, only on a specific conditional state, after another action's hidden flow, or when the plugin needs to define its own event class (e.g. for inbound webhooks). Triggers on mentions of "JFB events", "action events", "GATEWAY.SUCCESS", "DEFAULT.PROCESS", "supported_events", "unsupported_events", "get_required_events", "Base_Event", "Base_Gatewa...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "generate an SEO report", "出月报", "set SEO alerts", or "排名掉了提醒我"; two modes — report builds multi-metric traffic/ranking/authority/content dashboards, and alert configures threshold notifications for future ranking, traffic, technical, backlink, competitor, and AI-visibility changes. Not for raw position-by-position deltas — use rank-tracker. SEO报告/绩效仪表盘/SEO预警/排名监控

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures deep linking in Flutter using Android App Links (assetlinks.json) and iOS Universal Links (apple-app-site-association) integrated with GoRouter v17.x navigation. Use this skill when setting up HTTPS domain association, handling magic links or email verification links, routing marketing campaign URLs (Google Ads, Facebook Ads) into the app, implementing password reset or invite flows via deep links, fixing deep link verification failures, troubleshooting GoRouter deep link integration, or any time the words 'deep link', 'universal link', 'app link', 'assetlinks', 'AASA', 'magic link', or 'deeplinking' appear in the request. Avoids deprecated custom URL schemes (myapp://).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures Codemagic CI/CD pipelines for Flutter using `codemagic.yaml`. Use when setting up automated Flutter builds on Codemagic, configuring iOS code signing without Fastlane Match, deploying to App Store Connect or Google Play from Codemagic, caching pub dependencies in Codemagic, setting up encrypted environment variable groups, running tests with Codemagic's test dashboard, or choosing between Codemagic and GitHub Actions + Fastlane for a Flutter CI/CD pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows for Flutter projects. Use when creating or editing `.github/workflows/` YAML files for Flutter, integrating subosito/flutter-action, automating `flutter test`, `flutter analyze`, or `dart format` on push or pull_request events, running build_runner in CI, building Android AAB or iOS IPA artifacts, managing keystore or signing secrets in GitHub Secrets, or combining GitHub Actions with Fastlane or Codemagic for the deployment stage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turborepo monorepo build system guidance. Triggers on: turbo.json, task pipelines, dependsOn, caching, remote cache, the "turbo" CLI, --filter, --affected, CI optimization, environment variables, internal packages, monorepo structure/best practices, and boundaries. Use when user: configures tasks/workflows/pipelines, creates packages, sets up monorepo, shares code between apps, runs changed/affected packages, debugs cache, or has apps/packages directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures autonomous heartbeat and cron-based proactive routines (e.g., morning briefing setup, unanswered-message scan cadence). Invoke when user is SETTING UP or MODIFYING a proactive routine, not when the routine itself fires. Cron crons execute their own logic — they do NOT load this skill. Triggers: "set up proactive check", "configure heartbeat", "add morning briefing", "tune cron cadence".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for Matplotlib data visualization, plotting, and creating publication-quality figures in Python

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data loss prevention policies using Microsoft Purview to protect sensitive information across Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, endpoint devices, and Power BI. The analyst configures sensitivity labels with encryption and content marking, creates DLP policies using built-in and custom sensitive information types with regex patterns, Dağıt:s endpoint DLP rules to control file operations on Windows and macOS devices, and monitors policy effectiveness through Activity Expl...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing by automatically generating and executing test sequences that exercise API endpoints, discover producer-consumer dependencies between requests, and Bul: security and reliability bugs. The tester compiles an OpenAPI specification into a RESTler fuzzing grammar, configures authentication, runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes, and analyzes results for 500 errors, authentication bypasses, resource leaks, and payload injection vulnerabilities. ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements API rate limiting and throttling controls using token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window algorithms to protect against brute force attacks, credential stuffing, resource exhaustion, and API abuse. The engineer configures per-user, per-IP, and per-endpoint rate limits using Redis-backed counters, API gateway plugins, or application middleware, and implements proper HTTP 429 responses with Retry-After headers. Activates for requests involving rate limiting implementation, API t...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point that validates, throttles, and monitors all API traffic before it reaches backend services. Activates for requests involving API gateway security, API management security, gateway a...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements AWS Nitro Enclave-based confidential computing environments with cryptographic attestation, KMS policy integration using PCR-based condition keys, and secure vsock communication channels. The practitioner builds enclave images, configures attestation-aware KMS policies, validates attestation documents against the AWS Nitro PKI root of trust, and establishes isolated computation pipelines for processing sensitive data such as PII, cryptographic keys, and healthcare records. Activate...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。