4,415 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematically QA test a web application with browser-based bug fixing. Four modes: diff-aware (automatic on feature branches), full (systematic exploration), quick (30-second smoke test), regression (compare against baseline). Atomic bug-fix workflow with regression testing. Health scoring across 8 categories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Live-site visual QA audit with fix loop. 10-category checklist (~80 items) including AI Slop Detection (10 blacklisted patterns). Atomic commits per fix. Before/after screenshots. A-F grading. Parallel cross-model code-level design audit. Modes: Full, Quick, Deep, Diff-aware, Regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Emergency production fix workflow
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement approved SEO fixes on a connected CMS, approval-gated. "push the audit fixes live"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts, iteration-count reporting, PR signoff comments, and blocked-state handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite for in-memory Postgres testing, mock sandbox patterns, test-fix-rerun loops, verify gates after every edit, and the full lifecycle from implementation through passing tests to commit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured debugging methodology — use before proposing fixes for any error or failure. Covers: code bugs, build errors, deploy failures, config conflicts, dependency issues, infra problems. Also use when previous fix attempts failed or root cause is unclear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive blueprint for Action RPGs including real-time combat (hitbox/hurtbox, stat-based damage), character progression (RPG stats, leveling, skill trees), loot systems (procedural item generation, affixes, rarity tiers), equipment systems (gear slots, stat modifiers), and ability systems (cooldowns, mana cost, AOE). Based on expert ARPG design from Diablo, Path of Exile, Souls-like developers. Trigger keywords: action_rpg, loot_generator, rpg_stats, skill_tree, hitbox_combat, item_affixes, equipment_slots, ability_cooldown, stat_scaling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive blueprint for Action RPGs including real-time combat (hitbox/hurtbox, stat-based damage), character progression (RPG stats, leveling, skill trees), loot systems (procedural item generation, affixes, rarity tiers), equipment systems (gear slots, stat modifiers), and ability systems (cooldowns, mana cost, AOE). Based on expert ARPG design from Diablo, Path of Exile, Souls-like developers. Trigger keywords: action_rpg, loot_generator, rpg_stats, skill_tree, hitbox_combat, item_affixes, equipment_slots, ability_cooldown, stat_scaling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage playbook for when cold email deliverability breaks. Decision-tree guidance for "I landed in spam", "bounce rate spiked", "domain blacklisted", "inbox blocked in warmup", "reply rate dropped". Tells you what to check first, what to fix, and how long the fix takes. Pair with /email-deliverability-audit for diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before fixing any bug, write a test that reproduces it and watch it fail. Use for every bug fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Higgsfield generation fails, produces poor quality, looks wrong, doesn't match the prompt, or the user needs to fix or improve an output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a finished DESIGN needs scoring and feedback — brand consistency, hierarchy plus readability plus accessibility, conversion elements, and platform fit, 10 points each, with per-issue feedback in issue, why, and how-to-fix form and a verdict of approve, minor fix, or redo. Trigger on 'design review', 'review this design', 'score this creative', 'is this design good', 'brand check on this banner', 'can we ship this or not'. Also use when the user just sends an image and asks for thoughts. Not for — reviewing copy and briefs, see `62-marketing-review-global`; writing the brief before production, see `42-image-brief-global`; the brand rules being checked against, see `46-brand-guideline-global`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate a Jetpack Compose app to edge-to-edge display and fix system bar inset issues. Use when UI components are obscured by navigation/status bars, fixing IME insets, or enabling edge-to-edge for SDK 35+.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Long-running iterative cycle — one entry, seven modes (debug|improve|planex|review|security|defensive|ui). Shared archaeology/audit → fix → verify → generalize → discover → persist skeleton with mode-specific dimensions. User-invoked campaign entry; single-step fixes route via /maestro-next
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anything in a Phoenix app is slow, times out, or uses too much memory, even if the cause looks obvious. Load it before analyzing or fixing: it runs measured Ecto, LiveView and OTP checks and ranks fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recall prior work from past sessions — how a bug was fixed, what was decided, where a pattern lives. Use when asked 'have we done this before' or 'how did I fix X' in Elixir/Phoenix work. ccrider MCP when available, else git + solution docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture Elixir/Ecto/LiveView lessons and Hex API rules. Use after corrections or when asked to document learning, record a lesson, prevent a fixed mistake, or remember package guidance with --library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recall prior work from past sessions — how a bug was fixed, what was decided, where a pattern lives. Use when asked 'have we done this before' or 'how did I fix X' in Elixir/Phoenix work. ccrider MCP when available, else git + solution docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture Elixir/Ecto/LiveView lessons and Hex API rules. Use after corrections or when asked to document learning, record a lesson, prevent a fixed mistake, or remember package guidance with --library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anything in a Phoenix app is slow, times out, or uses too much memory, even if the cause looks obvious. Load it before analyzing or fixing: it runs measured Ecto, LiveView and OTP checks and ranks fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify a fix", "reproduce failure", "diagnose issue", "check BEFORE/AFTER state", "VF task", "reality check", "check test quality", "mock-only tests", or needs guidance on verifying fixes by reproducing failures before and after implementation, or detecting mock-heavy test anti-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。