「insight」の検索結果

Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive data science workflow skill for analyzing tabular and time series data. Use when conducting exploratory data analysis, building predictive models, performing feature engineering, or generating data-driven insights. Supports end-to-end analysis from data understanding through model deployment, following industry best practices for regression, classification, time series forecasting, and statistical analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save the latest learning as a numbered markdown file under ~/.claude/learnings and update the learnings index with title and tags. Use when the user says "save", asks to record a learning, or wants the current insight stored for later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile up to five durable insights from the current conversation for possible addition to CLAUDE.md. Use before clearing context, when asked to remember lessons, or when the user wants project conventions and preferences preserved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares the trend update for a recurring emailed report: identifies report emails not yet processed, extracts the configured metrics from their spreadsheet, CSV or PDF attachments, returns new rows for an append-only trends sheet and writes a DRAFT summary with period-on-period deltas and flagged anomalies. Use when the user asks to "update the trends for the weekly report", "analyse the latest monthly report", "what changed in the latest report", "do the latest numbers look unusual" or "set up tracking for a report that arrives by email". Do not use for a single file with no trend state, use dataset-insight-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns reported data problems (messages, tickets, meeting notes, complaints) into one DRAFT issue log: one row per issue with the symptom as reported, dataset and fields named, reproduction steps, affected reports, first seen date, reporters, a suggested owner, and blank severity, root cause and status cells for the owner. Never asserts a root cause, severity or fix. Use when the user asks to "log these data issues", "turn these complaints about the numbers into an issue list", "build the data quality backlog", "which reports are hit by this data problem" or "write up the reproduction steps for this data bug". Do not use for exploring or profiling a dataset, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for an IT incident write-up, use incident-postmortem-drafter; for tracking fix actions once assigned, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT data dictionary from a schema export, table definition, sample rows or a partial existing dictionary: one row per field with the name as stated, type as stated or observed, meaning quoted from the documentation supplied, owner, allowed values, and UNKNOWN wherever no source defines the field, plus a gap list for the data owner. Never infers a definition from a column name. Use when the user asks to "build a data dictionary for this table", "document these columns", "what does each field mean", "turn this schema export into a dictionary" or "fill in the field definitions from these documents". Do not use for profiling values or finding patterns in the data, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for metric definitions, use kpi-definition-sheet; for logging data defects, use data-quality-issue-log. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an actuals-versus-budget extract (spreadsheet, export or pasted table) into a DRAFT variance table with absolute and percentage variances, favourable or adverse marking and a ranking by size, then drafts plain-language driver hypotheses for each material variance as questions to verify with a named owner, never as asserted causes. Use when the user asks to "explain these variances", "why are we over budget on this line", "write the variance commentary for the management pack", "actuals versus budget analysis" or "which lines drive the variance". Do not use for a dataset with no budget or comparison column, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for weekly operational figures against last week, use kpi-weekly-report-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query PostHog product analytics via REST API — event analytics, HogQL SQL queries, feature flags, experiments, session recordings, insights, persons, cohorts. Use when the user wants to answer an analytics question, toggle/inspect a flag, or pull event data programmatically without opening the PostHog UI or installing the PostHog MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Squeeze three to five durable lessons out of the owner's own words from the last seven days into a weekly note in the insights folder. The LLM reads only a collector's digest, never the raw corpus. Triggers: "/wisdom-distill", "distill my week", "weekly wisdom".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

We find that the evolution of cooperation differs markedly across base models, with societies of Cla

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。