Reference: DEPRECATED — use `/client-letter` for routine correspondence or `/status client` for substantive updates. Split into two more focused skills during the v2 rebuild. Kept as a redirect for migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,824 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reference: DEPRECATED — use `/client-letter` for routine correspondence or `/status client` for substantive updates. Split into two more focused skills during the v2 rebuild. Kept as a redirect for migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routine client correspondence from templates — appointment confirmations, document requests, brief "we filed it" updates. Plain language, required elements, supervision routing. NOT substantive advice. Use when a student needs to send routine correspondence, an appointment confirmation, a document request letter, or a brief status note to a client.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the IP clauses in an agreement — assignment, ownership, license grants, warranties, indemnities. Use when reviewing IP terms in employment, consulting, SOW, vendor, or licensing agreements, when asked to check the assignment language or license scope, or when an agreement with IP provisions is pasted or attached.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference: review of an inbound vendor agreement against the team playbook in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Flags deviations, assesses risk, generates specific redline language, and routes to the right approver. Loaded by /commercial-legal:review when a vendor MSA, services agreement, or similar is detected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds evaluation suites for the Axiom AI SDK. Generates eval files, scorers, flag schemas, and config from natural-language descriptions. Use when creating evals, writing scorers, setting up flag schemas, or configuring axiom.config.ts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query a running Convex app's logs + health in natural language (official MCP): failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality — scoped, evidence-backed, with a dashboard deep link.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end guide on developing new Apache Beam I/O connectors correctly, including core IO transforms, SchemaTransforms, URN proto definitions, Managed API integration, cross-language expansion service, and testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract a comprehensive design system (DESIGN.md) directly from frontend source code — React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, plain HTML/CSS, or any web framework. Analyzes component files, stylesheets, Tailwind configs, theme definitions, and design tokens to produce a rich, Stitch-compatible design system document. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reverse-engineer a design system from an existing codebase, audit the visual language of a project, extract design tokens from source files, or understand the styling patterns in a frontend repo — even if they just say "what does this app look like?" or "pull out the design from this code."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adapt this C/C++ ASAN vulnerability pipeline to a different vulnerability class, target shape, language, or detection mechanism. Use when the user wants to port, migrate, retarget, customize, or fork the pipeline for something other than C/C++ memory-safety bugs — web apps, smart contracts, deserialization, ML systems, or any other domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a Trailmark summary analysis on a codebase. Returns auto-detected languages, entry point count, and dependency list. Use when vivisect or galvanize needs a quick structural overview. Triggers: trailmark summary, code summary, structural overview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up and runs Ruzzy, Trail of Bits' coverage-guided Ruby fuzzer and the only production-ready one for the language. Covers harness structure, fuzzing pure Ruby and the native C extensions in gems, and sanitizer builds. Use when fuzzing a Ruby library or gem, testing a Ruby C extension for memory safety, or asking how to fuzz Ruby at all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a Semgrep security scan over a codebase: detects languages, selects rulesets, presents the plan for explicit approval, then runs every approved ruleset through scripts/run-scans.sh, which batches the semgrep processes and writes scans.json, and merges the output to SARIF. Supports two scan modes, "run all" for full ruleset coverage and "important only" for security findings at medium-to-high confidence and impact. Uses Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis when it is available. Use when asked to scan code for vulnerabilities, run a security audit with Semgrep, find bugs, or perform static analysis. For the same scan without the approval gate, use the /static-analysis:semgrep-scan workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates devcontainers with Claude Code, language-specific tooling (Python/Node/Rust/Go), and persistent volumes. Use when adding devcontainer support to a project, setting up isolated development environments, or configuring sandboxed Claude Code workspaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "open source this project", "prepare this repository for public release", "make this repo public", "check open-source readiness", "choose a license for this project", or "set up release automation" ahead of a public launch. Provides a release-readiness workflow covering secrets hygiene, licensing, documentation, CI, and language-specific packaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates security patches with reproducible baseline-versus-patched evidence, including original exploits, root-cause variants, behavior preservation, regressions, and newly introduced security failures. Use after a patch exists and before accepting, merging, or reporting it as fixed; also use when an AI-generated patch, remediation commit, pull request, or proposed upstream fix needs adversarial post-patch validation across any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practical offensive fuzzing methodology covering target identification, fuzzer selection (AFL++, libFuzzer, Honggfuzz, Boofuzz, syzkaller), harness writing, corpus curation, mutation strategies, coverage measurement, and crash triage. Use when setting up or running fuzz campaigns against any target: file parsers, network protocols, kernel drivers, EDR engines, embedded firmware, or language runtimes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local Codex plugin in engineer-friendly language. Use when the user says "evaluate this plugin", "audit this plugin", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "help me benchmark this plugin", or asks for a plugin-wide report before comparing versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Do NOT use for general code review, debugging, threat modeling (use security-threat-model), or non-security tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files openable in Excalidraw. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", "generate an Excalidraw file", "draw an ER diagram", "create a sequence diagram", or "make a class diagram". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, architecture, DFD, swimlane, class, sequence, and ER diagrams. Can use icon libraries (AWS, GCP, etc.) when set up. Do NOT use for code architecture analysis (use the architecture skills), Mermaid diagram rendering (use mermaid-studio), or non-visual documentation (use docs-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。