681 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes audit readiness systems for internal control testing, evidence collection workflows, statistical sampling methodology, audit finding documentation, and remediation tracking using PCAOB, ISA, and SOX compliance frameworks..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a research study. Use when the user says "study design", "design my research", "what research method should I use", "how do I test this hypothesis", "research plan", "methodology section", "experimental design", "survey design", "qualitative study design", "how to structure my study", "sample size", "data collection plan", or needs to plan how to test a research question or hypothesis - even if they don't explicitly say "study design".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants OpenClaw to build, refine, test, or validate a CLI-Anything harness for a GUI application or source repository. Adapts the CLI-Anything methodology to OpenClaw without changing the generated Python harness format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants Codex to build, refine, test, validate, or list CLI-Anything harnesses for GUI applications or source repositories. Adapts the full CLI-Anything methodology to Codex without changing the generated Python harness format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants Hermes Agent to build, refine, test, or validate a CLI-Anything harness for a GUI application or source repository. Adapts the CLI-Anything methodology to Hermes without changing the generated Python harness format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants Reasonix to build, refine, test, or validate a CLI-Anything harness for a GUI application or source repository. Adapts the CLI-Anything methodology to Reasonix without changing the generated Python harness format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4-phase systematic debugging methodology with root cause analysis and evidence-based verification. Use when debugging complex issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Academic research assistant — literature review + methodology (quant/qual) + paper outline (IMRaD) + citation + research gap analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write high-converting copy for any medium — landing pages, emails, ads, UX, sales pages, video scripts, and brand voice. Complete methodology with frameworks, templates, scoring rubrics, and swipe files. Use when writing or reviewing any user-facing text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write high-converting copy for any surface — landing pages, emails, ads, sales pages, product descriptions, CTAs, video scripts, and more. Complete conversion copywriting system with research methodology, 12 proven frameworks, swipe-file templates, scoring rubrics, and A/B testing protocols. Use when you need to write or review any copy meant to drive action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, deploy, and operate production AI agent systems — single agents, multi-agent teams, and autonomous swarms. Complete methodology from agent architecture through orchestration, memory systems, safety guardrails, and operational excellence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced OpenClaw skill creation handler that executes the official 5-step research flow with comprehensive analysis and best practices. Ensures proper methodology when users request to create or modify OpenClaw/Moltbot/ClawDBot skills following official standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine academic writing for computer science research papers targeting top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, AAAI, IJCAI, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CVPR, WWW, KDD, SIGIR, CIKM, and similar). Use this skill whenever a user asks to improve, polish, refine, edit, or proofread academic or research writing — including paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, related work sections, methodology descriptions, experiment write-ups, or conclusion sections. Also trigger when users paste LaTeX content and ask for writing help, mention "camera-ready", "rebuttal", "paper revision", or reference any academic venue or conference. This skill handles both full paper refinement and section-by-section editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an academic writing expert specializing in scholarly papers, literature reviews, research methodology, and thesis writing. You must adhere to strict academic standards in all outputs.## Core Requirements1. **Output Format**: Use Markdown exclusively for all writing outputs and always wrap the main content of your response within <ama-doc></ama-doc> tags to clearly distinguish the core i...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product Discovery through an 18-task methodology in 6 blocks — from market analysis to an investor-ready financial plan. Use when someone wants to run Product Discovery, validate a startup, assess a market hypothesis, prepare for an investment round, or raises an adjacent topic — idea validation, niche sizing, competitor teardown, product-market fit, pitch preparation, startup unit economics, geographic expansion into a new country, go-to-market for SEA / Asia / MENA. People rarely name PD explicitly; they say 'is there a market for this', 'assess my idea', 'I need a deck for an angel', 'we are entering Thailand/Singapore/UAE, how do we size it'. Use the skill in those cases too. Three modes: Light (~45 min, idea stage), Full (~2-3 h, MVP with customers), Geographic Expansion (~2 h, product entering a new geography). Produces 3-4 artifacts in /mnt/user-data/outputs/: one-pager.pptx, financial-plan.xlsx, presentation.pptx, optionally interview-guide.docx.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging methodology. Reproduce → Isolate → Hypothesize → Verify → Fix → Confirm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。