「plans」の検索結果

Executes implementation plans with progress tracking, checkpoint validation, and quality gates. Use after planning is complete and tasks are ready to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection. Plans the arms, decoupled rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes, reviewer panel, inter-rater reliability targets and LLM-as-judge versus human adjudication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user describes a research goal without naming a skill, or the task spans several skills. Classifies the request, plans the order and routes to the right medsci-skills skill(s) instead of producing their output itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing a medical-imaging dataset (DICOM/NIfTI) for modelling. Profiles spacing, orientation, intensity, label integrity, foreground fraction and target volume, gates them against the plan, then plans and audits preprocessing and augmentation for leakage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stack Honey onto Superpowers-style workflows (subagent-driven-development, dispatching-parallel-agents, executing-plans) and any orchestration that dispatches fresh subagents. Dispatched subagents run in isolated context and do NOT inherit the session's Honey hook, so they emit full-fat code and verbose reports. Use when you are about to dispatch implementer/reviewer/fixer/parallel subagents: it gives the exact Honey directive to paste into each dispatch prompt, with a worker variant and a reviewer variant, so the levers apply inside the subagents too — where the multiplied cost actually is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when polishing, diagnosing, tailoring, or exporting resumes for LLM, RAG, Agent, Agentic RL, post-training, pretraining, AIGC, search/ranking, multimodal, AI backend, or LLM algorithm internships from raw resume text, a materials folder, and/or a target job description. Audits evidence, maps JD fit, enforces truth boundaries, writes polished and targeted resumes, generates interviewer-style grilling questions, answer cards, evidence-upgrade plans, and optional open-source project recommendations without fabricating experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check agent-produced plans, tests, or code against the owner's actual intent. Find missing meaning, unrequested work, stale truth, unreachable decisions, unsupported completion claims, and implementation debt. Use before approval or merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial review and fix loop for code, specs, plans, and migration manifests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of gap analysis findings into phased implementation plans with milestones and risk-based prioritisation. Activate when building compliance programmes or allocating privacy budgets. Keywords: remediation roadmap, implementation plan, phased approach, prioritisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages the organisational DPIA register tracking all Data Protection Impact Assessments across the enterprise. Covers DPIA lifecycle management, status tracking, review scheduling, Art. 35(11) periodic reassessment, and supervisory authority reporting. Implements a centralised register linking DPIAs to RoPA entries, risk registers, and mitigation plans. Keywords: DPIA register, DPIA tracking, Art. 35(11), review schedule, DPIA lifecycle, centralised register, DPIA portfolio management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AAS stack manifests, preview plans and selection evidence in Workbench without applying changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a plot arc", "story structure", "add a plot point", "story timeline", "track foreshadowing", "pacing", "sagging middle", "act structure", "story arc", "plot outline", "snowflake method", or wants to plan and manage the narrative structure of a story. It owns book-level pacing; NOT for the craft of scene outcomes or chapter hooks, which this skill only plans in the outline (use scene-craft), or a pacing check as a revision pass (use revision-continuity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, creates, and optimizes digital marketing campaigns including content strategy, social media, email marketing, SEO, and AI visibility (GEO). Generates UTM parameters and tracking URLs. Helps develop go-to-market strategies, campaign messaging, content calendars, and performance measurement frameworks. Use when asked to "create a marketing campaign", "plan content strategy", "build email sequences", "set up UTM tracking", "analyze marketing metrics", "launch a product", "optimize for SEO", "improve AI visibility", "optimize for voice search", "set up IndexNow", "check accessibility for SEO", or "create social media previews". Supports both marketing beginners and experienced marketers needing templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert structured project-note JSON manuscripts into validated EPUB and optional Kindle-clickable PDF files. Use when the user asks to turn project notes, book-system JSON, FIRE-indexed notes, Luhmann/Zettelkasten numbered chunks, table-of-contents cards, index cards, cross-linked project notes, or manuscript JSON into an EPUB/PDF with chapter directories, keyword index cards, weighted links, bidirectional backlinks, versioned filenames, chapter-splitting plans, and full link testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview-based strategic planning for complex software tasks. Conducts structured requirements gathering, gap analysis, and generates detailed work plans before implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes secure remediation strategies for detected security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks, insecure deserialization, improper authentication, and unsafe cryptographic usage. Provides recommended security checks, safer API alternatives, design-level changes, code examples, trade-off analysis, and prioritized remediation plans. Does NOT automatically modify code unless explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create structured playtesting plans for user feedback. Use when the user says "playtest plan" or "playtesting"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute plans task-by-task with two-stage review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build supplier performance scorecards with KPIs, quality metrics, delivery performance, cost management, and improvement plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design customer onboarding playbooks with milestone tracking, training plans, health checks, and success criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。