「readiness」の検索結果

Assess agentic layer maturity using the 12-grade classification system (Class 1-3). Use when evaluating codebase readiness, identifying next upgrade steps, or tracking progress toward the Codebase Singularity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a codebase for agent-friendliness based on autonomous agent best practices. Use when asked to "evaluate for agents", "check agent readiness", "audit for autonomous execution", "assess agent-friendliness", or when reviewing infrastructure for unattended agent operation. Also use when asked about making a codebase more suitable for AI agents or autonomous workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality validation specialist covering functional, performance, and security testing to ensure production readiness through evidence-based testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when searching for buying signals, detecting intent data, scoring prospect readiness, or monitoring accounts for trigger events. Triggers: 'scan for signals', 'find buying signals', 'who is ready to buy', 'intent signals', 'signal scoring', 'account signals'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and refine GitHub Well-Architected Framework (WAF) documentation under the content/ folder for clarity, precision, consistency, and publication readiness. Use this when reviewing pull requests, markdown files, or draft content in content/ to ensure guidance is unambiguous, readable, and aligned with editorial standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a branch or PR for merge readiness and produce a QA report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a public HTTP(S) page before building browser automation, extraction, or an integration. Use this skill to collect bounded structural evidence, readiness signals, risk flags, acceptance tests, and remediation priorities without sending credentials or accessing private targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages ArgoCD application syncs using the argocd CLI and the Argo CD REST API (v1alpha1). Supports progressive delivery with Argo Rollouts integration and automated health checks via Kubernetes readiness probes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert customer onboarding guidance for accelerating time-to-value and ensuring successful implementations. Use when designing onboarding programs, creating kickoff frameworks, building implementation plans, or optimizing customer activation. Use for training delivery, go-live readiness, sales-to-CS handoffs, early warning detection, and tech-touch automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 4: Spec. Full implementation readiness package including solution design, UX direction, tech stack, backlog, MVP prioritization, risk assessment, and AI architecture for Claude Code projects — CLAUDE.md, skill mapping, AI specs, sprint planning, quality gates. Triggers on "spec", "phase 4", "build ready", "implementation plan", "CLAUDE.md", "sprint planning", "backlog", "AI spec", or after Phase I exit checklist is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'fix my catalog for ai', 'improve my ai readiness score', 'get my catalog to 90', or 'my products keep getting rejected by google'. Runs an ordered fixlist that writes the missing alt text, descriptions, brands, GTINs, and category mappings, snapshotting before each change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before starting delivery work. Pre-implementation validation checklist to ensure readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses scaling companies with product-market fit validation, unit economics maturity, and growth trajectory sustainability analysis. Use when evaluating growth-stage investments, analyzing scaling businesses, or assessing expansion readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures growth-focused DD with revenue quality, customer concentration, technology scalability, and organizational readiness. Use when conducting growth DD, validating revenue sustainability, or assessing scale capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses leadership team capacity to scale with organizational design review, key person risk, and executive bench analysis. Use when evaluating management scalability, identifying talent gaps, or assessing organizational readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates geographic expansion strategies with market entry sequencing, localization requirements, and international unit economics. Use when analyzing expansion plans, assessing international readiness, or modeling geo-expansion costs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews startup financial models for investor readiness: validates unit economics, stress-tests runway scenarios, and benchmarks metrics against stage-appropriate targets. Use the full review, about 10–15 minutes, when the user provides a financial model (Excel, CSV, or a model pasted as text) and asks for review, validation, runway analysis, or unit-economics scoring. For a single money question with figures to compute, such as 'how long do I have?' or 'is a 4x burn multiple bad?', use its shorter quick check, so the answer comes from the calculator and dated benchmarks, not mental arithmetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate for HIGH/EPIC tasks that validates plan completeness and architecture compliance before implementation begins

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List configured models, guide provider setup, verify local Kimi companion readiness, and manage the PreToolUse hook plus optional review gate. Use when asked about available models, subscription/API-key setup, default selection, or explicitly requested to install, check, enable, disable, or uninstall the integration. Codex and Claude Code share one ~/.kimi-code/config.toml but each own a host-scoped block, so $kimi-setup here does not disturb Claude Code's /kimi:setup (and vice-versa).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。