604 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add or update a GEODE model or provider from current primary documentation and repository call-site evidence. Use for model IDs, context limits, pricing, reasoning controls, provider routes, capability gates, or fallback changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当AI智能体需要处理以下情形时触发本技能： 1. 当前案件/问题在现行法律中没有直接、明确的规定（法律漏洞）； 2. 需要参考已有判例、相似案件或相近法律规范来推导当前问题的处理方案； 3. 用户明确要求"参照""比照""类推适用"某一规范或案例； 4. 在法律论证中需要以"相似案件相似处理"（Like cases should be treated alike）原则支撑结论； 5. 需要评估两个或多个案件/规范之间的相似性与差异性，以判断能否进行类比； 6. 在合同解释、侵权责任认定、行政处罚裁量等场景中，需要借助类似情形的处理经验形成论证。 本技能的核心是：识别相似性基础（tertium comparationis），论证类比的正当性，并在此基础上得出合理的法律结论。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured step-by-step reasoning before acting, to avoid guessing. For complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis checks. NOT for being stuck on approach (mk:problem-solving).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when stuck on approach (not debugging). Strategic unsticking via 7 non-default techniques: simplification cascades, collision-zone thinking, meta-pattern recognition, inversion, scale game, first principles, via negativa. Triggers on complexity spiraling, innovation block, recurring patterns across domains, forced-assumption solutions, scale uncertainty, told-it's-impossible, or bloated systems needing subtraction. For evidence-based root-cause debugging, use mk:sequential-thinking instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit. Auto-triggers when staging changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Heuristic search-based temporal planning and scheduling for complex multi-constraint environments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Time-travel debugging for DAG executions. Inspect agent state at any node, replay decisions with modified inputs, compare execution traces side-by-side, and identify where reasoning diverged. Inspired by LangGraph Studio's state-editing model and Temporal's event history. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "time travel debug", "inspect node state", "what went wrong at step", "compare runs", "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement executable BDI reasoning with explicit negation, paraconsistent revision, trigger-based commitment updates, and abduction. Use for runtime agent semantics and conflicting desires. NOT for purely axiomatic modal logic, black-box planners, or classical logic without operational semantics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic image-text matching with CLIP and alternatives. Use for image search, zero-shot classification, similarity matching. NOT for counting objects, fine-grained classification (celebrities, car models), spatial reasoning, or compositional queries. Activate on "CLIP", "embeddings", "image similarity", "semantic search", "zero-shot classification", "image-text matching".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug like Fable 5 — systematic root cause analysis with natural reasoning flow. Use this skill when you encounter an error, unexpected behavior, failing tests, or anything that does not work as intended.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify like Fable 5 — obsessive, systematic, evidence-based quality assurance woven into your reasoning. Use this skill when you have just written or modified code, need to confirm something works, are running tests, or need to validate output against requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think like Fable 5 — natural, flowing, purposeful reasoning distilled from 4,665 real chain-of-thought traces with mathematical precision. Use this skill EVERY TIME before writing code, making decisions, or taking action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a deep architectural analysis or security review requiring extended reasoning. Use for complex architecture decisions, security audits, or when standard analysis is not finding the root cause.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds the "Report Sources" child page for a finished Weekly Community Signal report — an evidence-backed defense of WHY every item landed in the column/section/rank it did. The agent argues each placement like a lawyer (claim → evidence → rule → rebuttal) but is under oath: it CANNOT invent, spin, or overstate — every claim ties to a verifiable fact (issue #, label, PR type, quoted comment, npm output, the front-door test). Not CYA — it's so Nathan can defend the report with facts and see the exact reasoning behind each call. Runs after the report (invoked by weekly-report, last steps) and on "report sources", "defend the report", "why is this here".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Form a committee of two high-reasoning agents to step back, do root cause analysis, and produce a plan. Use when stuck, looping, tunnel-visioning, or facing a hard planning problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Code workflow tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) and the Claude Code team. Use when: setting up Claude Code, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, configuring CLAUDE.md, using skills/commands, subagents, hooks, MCP integrations, or learning best practices. Covers: git worktrees, plan mode, verification, permissions, Slack MCP, BigQuery, prompting tips, plugins, custom agents, sandboxing, keybindings, status lines, output styles, customization, /simplify for code quality, /batch for parallel code migrations, /loop for scheduled tasks, code review agents, /btw for mid-task questions, /effort max reasoning, remote control sessions, voice mode, setup scripts, session naming, /color, PostCompact hook, auto mode, /schedule cloud jobs, iMessage plugin, auto-memory, and auto-dream, mobile app, session teleporting, Cowork Dispatch, Chrome extension, Desktop app, /branch forking, --bare SDK startup, --add-dir multi-repo, --agent custom agents, /voice input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex workflow tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Codex) and the Codex team. Use when: setting up Codex, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, configuring AGENTS.md, using skills/commands, subagents, hooks, MCP integrations, or learning best practices. Covers: git worktrees, plan mode, verification, permissions, Slack MCP, BigQuery, prompting tips, plugins, custom agents, sandboxing, keybindings, status lines, output styles, customization, /simplify for code quality, /batch for parallel code migrations, /loop for scheduled tasks, code review agents, /btw for mid-task questions, /effort max reasoning, remote control sessions, voice mode, setup scripts, session naming, /color, PostCompact hook, auto mode, /schedule cloud jobs, iMessage plugin, auto-memory, and auto-dream, mobile app, session teleporting, Cowork Dispatch, Chrome extension, Desktop app, /branch forking, --bare SDK startup, --add-dir multi-repo, --agent custom agents, /voice input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adaption AI SDK for synthetic data augmentation and dataset adaptation. Use when building data pipelines with the Adaption Python SDK, uploading datasets (local files, Hugging Face, Kaggle), running augmentation/adaptation jobs, configuring brand controls (hallucination mitigation, safety categories, length), recipe specifications (reasoning traces, deduplication, preference pairs, prompt rephrase), evaluating dataset quality, downloading results, or any workflow involving `pip install adaption`, `from adaption import Adaption`, Adaptive Data, or the adaptionlabs.ai API. Also trigger when the user mentions synthetic data generation for fine-tuning, dataset augmentation pipelines, DPO preference pair generation, or grounding-based hallucination reduction on training data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。