「remote」の検索結果

Use when a current decision needs pressure-testing until the rationale is clear to a skeptic. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user requests an accessibility audit, a11y check, or WCAG compliance review. Don't use for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asking "overkill?", "elegant?", "audit", or "taste-test this", or setting a taste register. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user needs coverage-guided fuzzing for Python code or a Python native extension using Atheris. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to push an already-working artifact to finished composition, texture, and feel. Not for remote or irreversible changes. Not for hygiene routing: use clean-and-true.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants adversarial stress-testing of a proposed architecture, structure, or shape. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to design or change a public API, route, CLI flag, or module boundary. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up a project, auditing agent command permissions, or asking which read-only bash commands and domains to allow. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a repo needs agent setup, AGENTS.md added or made lean, CLAUDE.md audited, or agent instructions scored or pruned. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human explicitly asks for a full repository agent-compatibility pass returning a scored report with prioritized fixes. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to make the skills framework work in a new harness, IDE, or CLI. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to create an MCP server to integrate an API or service in Python or TypeScript. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says greenfield this or rescue this codebase, names a field (dark, red, blue, or brown), or diagnoses a subsystem. Not for specs: use to-spec. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or verifying framework-specific code, boilerplate, or a documented, correct implementation. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to define patterns the agent should not do. Don't use for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to optimize code, make a path faster, make this as fast as possible, reduce allocations, repair a regression, profile a target, grill every inefficiency, or run a subsystem or repo-wide performance campaign against a measured floor; when a performance requirement, slowness report, Core Web Vitals miss, or profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; or for an "extremely optimize" performance campaign, optimizing suspected hot paths without waiting for benchmarks, or estimating hot and complexity-neutral cold paths while refusing complexity theater. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to run AST-based structural search, lint, or rewrite of code when regex is too fragile. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when onboarding to a repository, capturing costly conventions, constraints, or rationale, or improving AGENTS.md. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to implement under non-negotiable constraints: performance budgets, platform limits, legal or API rules. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to design a module interface, seam, or testable boundary. Not for UI direction picking: use design. No source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says deslop, debloat, tidy, simplify, clean a diff, cleanup codebase, or deslop branch diff, or remove dead code or config. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。