「report」の検索結果

Complete PDF workflow: verify, extract content, assemble reports, and generate output PDFs using command-line tools

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheet, diagram, and PDF report as a cohesive deliverable set with iteration budgeting per component

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate complex multi-page PDFs by running reportlab Python code directly via run_shell when shell_agent fails on document creation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enrolls a project in OSS-Fuzz, Google's free continuous fuzzing service for open source, and drives it locally. Covers project.yaml, Dockerfile and build.sh setup, the helper scripts, reproducing OSS-Fuzz crash reports, and the acceptance criteria. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing for an open-source project, reproducing an OSS-Fuzz bug report, or testing an OSS-Fuzz build before submitting it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running first-pass QC on Public Equity Investing decks or reports. Do not use as external-circulation certification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare KPI readouts, scorecards, WBR/MBR/QBR updates, and executive summaries from quantitative business or product metrics; use when the task is to report status, compare against targets, explain validated drivers, and state operating implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build polished analytical reports for executive, product, business, or technical audiences. Use when the task needs a durable answer-first narrative with evidence-backed findings, visuals or tables, caveats, and source context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数学建模非数据型图示绘制阶段。根据 ANALYSIS_MODELING_REPORT.md、RESULTS_REPORT.md 和已有 figures/ 生成技术路线图、子问题求解流程图、模型结构图、数据处理流程图等 DrawIO 图，并导出论文可引用 PDF。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数学建模编程实现与数据图表生成阶段。根据 ANALYSIS_MODELING_REPORT.md 编写可复现代码、运行求解、验证约束、输出 RESULTS_REPORT.md 并生成论文可用的数据驱动图表 PDF。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数学建模竞赛论文撰写阶段，支持 Typst 和 LaTeX 双引擎。根据 ANALYSIS_MODELING_REPORT.md、RESULTS_REPORT.md 和 figures/*.pdf 选择比赛模板、排版引擎、组织章节，并在论文正文中按章节直接插入图表。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before sending or suppressing any Leader message to Workers, Manager, or Team Admin. Always use this skill for cross-room Matrix messages, @mention decisions, task assignment notifications, structured status reports, completion reports, blocker/revision messages, questions, requester updates, or when deciding whether a same-room reply is enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classifies existing tests by standard traits and reports their distribution. USE FOR: tagging all tests with category attributes, categorizing/tagging/ labeling each test, compare happy vs error paths, audit the test mix, describe coverage shape by test type, or tag then verify the project builds. Read bodies when names mislead. Apply canonical attributes; otherwise report only. DO NOT USE FOR: requests owned by test-anti-patterns, coverage-analysis, crap-score, test-gap-analysis, code-testing, or migration skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install language servers (gopls, typescript-language-server, pyright, rust-analyzer) and their prerequisite toolchains (Go, Node/npm, rustup) so the lsp tool works. Use when the user asks to enable or install LSP / language-server support, when lsp_enable reports a missing toolchain, or when the lsp tool reports no language server is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon, pre-hunt learning, vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining, bypass tables, language-specific grep patterns, and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A set of resources to help write internal communications in common company formats. Use when asked to write internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt server-side template injection (SSTI) across Jinja2 (Flask/Django), Twig (Symfony), Freemarker (Java), ERB (Rails), Spring, Velocity, Mako, Thymeleaf, Smarty. Detection probes use double-curly and dollar-curly math expressions evaluated server-side. Once an engine is fingerprinted, escalate to RCE via the engine-specific class-walker, callback-registrar, or Execute-utility patterns documented in disclosed reports. Detection patterns: error messages reveal engine, blank or numeric eval reveals expression mode. Targets: email templates, PDF/report generators, CMS preview features, error pages with user input. Use when hunting RCE via template rendering, when content shows engine fingerprints, when finding endpoints that compose strings with user input before render.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace IDs, request bodies), HAR file sanitization (jq filters for Cookie/Set-Cookie/Authorization headers), Burp Repeater/Intruder screenshot hygiene (hide request body, show only Results table for rate-limit attacks), Chrome DevTools Console PoC patterns (credentials include so cookies are not echoed, labeled console.log), screenshot capture order, filename conventions, post-submission rotation hygiene. Use BEFORE any PoC screenshot, BEFORE attaching a HAR, or whenever preparing evidence with session cookies or other-user PII. Pairs with bugcrowd-reporting and report-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided statistical analysis with test selection and reporting. Use when you need help choosing appropriate tests for your data, assumption checking, power analysis, and APA-formatted results. Best for academic research reporting, test selection guidance. For implementing specific models programmatically use statsmodels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks for a TestDino audit of Playwright automated test code. Routes through the audit tools the TestDino MCP server exposes (get_audit_report + submit_audit_report, or the legacy test_audit). For generic code review or non-Playwright targets, do a normal review instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。