「sandbox」の検索結果

Codex workflow tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Codex) and the Codex team. Use when: setting up Codex, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, configuring AGENTS.md, using skills/commands, subagents, hooks, MCP integrations, or learning best practices. Covers: git worktrees, plan mode, verification, permissions, Slack MCP, BigQuery, prompting tips, plugins, custom agents, sandboxing, keybindings, status lines, output styles, customization, /simplify for code quality, /batch for parallel code migrations, /loop for scheduled tasks, code review agents, /btw for mid-task questions, /effort max reasoning, remote control sessions, voice mode, setup scripts, session naming, /color, PostCompact hook, auto mode, /schedule cloud jobs, iMessage plugin, auto-memory, and auto-dream, mobile app, session teleporting, Cowork Dispatch, Chrome extension, Desktop app, /branch forking, --bare SDK startup, --add-dir multi-repo, --agent custom agents, /voice input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construa agentes de IA que interagem com computadores como humanos fazem - visualizando telas, movimentando cursores, clicando botões e digitando texto. Cobre Computer Use da Anthropic, Operator/CUA da OpenAI e alternativas de código aberto. Foco crítico em sandboxing, segurança e tratamento dos desafios únicos do controle baseado em visão. Use quando: computer use, automação de desktop agent, controle de tela IA, agente baseado em visão, automação de GUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes network traffic generated by malware during sandbox execution or live incident response to identify C2 protocols, data exfiltration channels, payload downloads, and lateral movement patterns using Wireshark, Zeek, and Suricata. Activates for requests involving malware network analysis, C2 traffic decoding, malware PCAP analysis, or network-based malware detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps every proposed P&ID object from an accepted enrichment draft to the generic family, catalogue class and required attributes the project's intelligent P&ID authoring tool would need, as a readiness table with UNKNOWN wherever the project catalogue extract is not provided, plus connectivity readiness per line and a numbered list of import blockers. Mapping only: it never writes to the tool, never produces an import file and never claims a class exists in the catalogue. Use when the user asks to "build the readiness map", "show how far the draft is from a sandbox import", "list what would block the import", "map the objects to the tool catalogue" or "check attribute readiness against the catalogue extract" after gate G3. Do not use for validating the discipline sections or assembling the review package, use validation-and-review-package instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose or enable Session Cartographer semantic search in Codex, including least-privilege localhost access to local Qdrant and the embedding server. Use when setup, Qdrant health, localhost reachability, sandbox network denial, or semantic indexing is in question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce time-to-first-API-call (TTFAC) by optimizing every step of the developer onboarding journey. This skill covers authentication simplification, sandbox environments, interactive documentation, an

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate the Antigravity CLI (agy): plugins, auth, sandbox.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nicht böse, nur falsch optimiert: Was OpenAIs RubyGems-Vorfall über KI-Agenten und Reward-Hacking zeigt Wie OpenAIs Agenten durch Reward-Hacking eine

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test and prototype code in a sandboxed environment. Use for debugging, verifying logic, or installing packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates devcontainers with Claude Code, language-specific tooling (Python/Node/Rust/Go), and persistent volumes. Use when adding devcontainer support to a project, setting up isolated development environments, or configuring sandboxed Claude Code workspaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks how to "use VibeTags", "add VibeTags annotations", "set up AI guardrails", "protect code from AI", "configure AI platforms", asks about @AILocked, @AIContext, @AIDraft, @AIAudit, @AIIgnore, @AIPrivacy, @AICore, @AIPerformance, @AIContract, @AITestDriven, @AIThreadSafe, @AIImmutable, @AIDeprecated, @AIObservability, @AIRegulation, @AIArchitecture, @AILegacyBridge, @AIStrictClasspath, @AIInternationalized, @AIPublicAPI, @AISchemaSafe, @AIStrictExceptions, @AIStrictTypes, @AIParallelTests, @AIIdempotent, @AIFeatureFlag, @AISecure, @AICallersOnly, @AISandboxOnly, @AIMemoryBudget, @AIPure, @AIDomainModel, @AIExtensible, @AIInputSanitized, @AISecureLogging, @AIExplain, @AIPrototype, @AISunset, @AITemporary annotations, or wants to control how AI tools interact with Java code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI agents that interact with computers like humans do - viewing screens, moving cursors, clicking buttons, and typing text. Covers Anthropic's Computer Use, OpenAI's Operator/CUA, and open-source alternatives. Critical focus on sandboxing, security, and handling the unique challenges of vision-based control. Use when: computer use, desktop automation agent, screen control AI, vision-based agent, GUI automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill control-panel/workspace for a deal analyst to model revenue-based-financing (RBF) deals for SME businesses (retail/F&B chain stores). Use when the user invokes $kelly-revshare-simulator or /kelly-revshare-simulator, wants to model a revenue-share or merchant-cash-advance deal, project cash flow and repayment, compute a Cash-Flow Payout Multiple, effective annualized merchant cost, or compare/underwrite multiple financing scenarios. Pure deterministic math, no external calls, no real trading/payment side effects. Scenario create/edit/delete and the underwriting decision are direct writes made by the analyst, not a review/approval queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill dashboard for a shared LLM gateway's cost and model governance — daily spend trend, cost breakdown by service/model, a canary-rollout status board, and a deterministic cost/error anomaly list. Use when the user invokes $kelly-llm-gateway or /kelly-llm-gateway, or wants to review LLM gateway spend, model routing, canary rollouts, rollback readiness, or cost/error anomalies for services routed through one shared gateway to multiple LLM providers/models. Human actions (promote/rollback/hold a rollout, acknowledge an anomaly) write directly onto the route's own Busabase record — this skill never changes a real routing config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill low-code agent configuration and governance console for a platform team. Use when the user invokes $kelly-agent-builder or /kelly-agent-builder, wants to review or edit a catalog of mock LLM agent configs, check quota usage, find configs that need attention, move a draft to live, pause a live agent, or archive an agent. Mock config/governance console only — it never provisions or calls any real agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-Entity Disclosure Tracker App-in-Skill — a Busabase review workspace that helps a compliance/IR team assemble and track a standardized disclosure package per financing vehicle (fund/SPV), across a generic onshore origination entity, an offshore fund-manager entity, and a listing/exchange venue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-disclosure-tracker or /kelly-disclosure-tracker, wants to review disclosure checklists, vehicle readiness, cross-entity reconciliation flags, or reviewer notes across multiple financing vehicles. Review workspace only — it never files anything or calls any external system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase App-in-Skill review queue that scores candidate SME financing deals (revenue-based/RBF-style credit) with a deterministic, fully auditable rule-based rubric — never an LLM or API call. Use when the user invokes $kelly-deal-scorer or /kelly-deal-scorer, wants to review a deal-underwriting queue, score financing candidates, compute a composite score breakdown, see a suggested revenue-share rate range, or record approve/send-back/reject decisions for a private-credit or RBF-style lending pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase App-in-Skill dashboard over a fixed, deterministic mock user-behavior funnel dataset (browse → search → compare → booking attempt/abandon → complete) for a generic consumer booking product. Use when the user invokes $kelly-behavior-predict or /kelly-behavior-predict, wants to review funnel drop-off, per-segment predicted next actions, or backtest a rule-based "predicted next action" heuristic against a mock historical sample. Fully deterministic mock data and a hand-recomputable rule — never a real ML/LLM model, never a live system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。