「sme」の検索結果

Maps whether a biomedical research topic, subtopic, or study angle is truly saturated, superficially crowded, strategically occupied, or still open for differentiated entry. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a hot medical research direction is already overworked, whether meaningful whitespace remains, whether major groups have already occupied the obvious claims, and whether the timing window is still open. Always distinguish popularity from true saturation, and distinguish cosmetic novelty from meaningful differentiating entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when performing sample-level dimensionality reduction and visualization on abundance or OTU-style matrices with a companion group file, generating UMAP and/or t-SNE coordinates and plots for group separation assessment. NOT for: differential expression testing, single-cell workflows requiring dedicated embeddings pipelines, or analyses without a sample grouping file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a sample-level hierarchical clustering dendrogram from a bulk expression matrix and sample annotation table, especially for QC, batch inspection, or sample similarity assessment. Trigger keywords: hierarchical clustering, dendrogram, sample QC, batch inspection, sample similarity. NOT for: differential expression testing, gene clustering heatmaps, single-cell clustering workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to analyze an existing PostgreSQL database and identify which tables should be converted to Timescale/TimescaleDB hypertables. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Analyze database tables for hypertable conversion potential - Identify time-series or event tables in an existing schema - Evaluate if a table would benefit from Timescale/TimescaleDB - Audit PostgreSQL tables for migration to Timescale/TimescaleDB/TigerData - Score or rank tables for hypertable candidacy **Keywords:** hypertable candidate, table analysis, migration assessment, Timescale, TimescaleDB, time-series detection, insert-heavy tables, event logs, audit tables Provides SQL queries to analyze table statistics, index patterns, and query patterns. Includes scoring criteria (8+ points = good candidate) and pattern recognition for IoT, events, transactions, and sequential data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. Includes security assessment tools, threat modeling, crypto implementation, and security automation. Use when designing security architecture, conducting penetration tests, implementing cryptography, or performing security audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security vulnerability assessment identifying OWASP risks, injection vectors, authentication issues, and data exposure with severity classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured planning methodology with research, brainstorming, phased plan creation, risk assessment, and plan-to-build continuity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side comparison of two contract versions or two different contracts with change tracking, favorability analysis, and risk assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in threat modeling methodologies, security architecture review, and risk assessment. Masters STRIDE, PASTA, attack trees, and security requirement extraction. Use for security architecture reviews, threat identification, and secure-by-design planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor portfolio risk, R-multiples, and position limits. Creates hedging strategies, calculates expectancy, and implements stop-losses. Use PROACTIVELY for risk assessment, trade tracking, or portfolio protection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and incident response. Use PROACTIVELY for security audits, DevSecOps, or compliance implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schaltet sich ein, wenn in Aktenaufbereiter Strafrecht ein juristisches Arbeitsprodukt tragfähig begründet werden muss; verbindet konkrete Aktenfundstellen mit Tatbestandsmerkmal, Beweislast, stärkster Gegenposition und Rechtsfolge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schaltet sich ein, wenn in Agb Recht Prüfer ein juristisches Arbeitsprodukt tragfähig begründet werden muss; verbindet konkrete Aktenfundstellen mit Tatbestandsmerkmal, Beweislast, stärkster Gegenposition und Rechtsfolge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or restructure a course syllabus from a topic list or reading list — course description + prerequisites, week-by-week schedule (topic → readings → deliverables), measurable learning objectives, an assessment scheme + rubric, standard policies (late work, AI use, academic integrity, accessibility), and a per-week work-list to hand to `/create-lecture`. Use when user says "build a syllabus", "structure my course", "turn this reading list into a schedule", "draft a course outline", "make a syllabus for Econ 7xx", or "map weeks to lectures". Economics-aware (PhD metrics/micro/macro sequences, undergrad); generic enough for any field.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up AI Runway on AKS — from bare cluster to running model. Covers cluster verification, controller install, GPU assessment, provider setup, and first deployment. WHEN: "setup AI Runway", "onboard AKS cluster", "install AI Runway", "airunway setup", "deploy model to AKS", "GPU inference on AKS", "KAITO setup on AKS", "run LLM on AKS", "vLLM on AKS", "set up model serving on AKS", "AI Runway controller".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand RAI planner reference pack covering Phase 1 capture, Phase 2 risk classification and the optional Mural board bootstrap, Phase 5 impact assessment, and Phase 6 review and backlog handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and harden Roblox client/server networking with RemoteEvent, RemoteFunction, and UnreliableRemoteEvent; server authority, argument and Instance validation, rate limits, proximity/ownership checks, targeted replication, streaming, lifecycle, prediction, and reconciliation. Use for Roblox remotes, exploits, request spam, multiplayer replication, network ownership, high-frequency cosmetic updates, or server/client desynchronization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。