「submission」の検索結果

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

确认漏洞后产出正式 SRC/0day 提交稿 DOCX 报告的收口 skill。仅在漏洞已确认、准备成稿时使用——负责查重、过分层验证门、按固定 DOCX 骨架生成报告（Heading 2 章节 + Step 式 PoC + 内嵌真实截图）、语义化命名、放对目录、处理驳回追加。不负责挖掘/验证漏洞本身。TRIGGER：用户说"写报告/出报告/成稿/提交稿/生成漏洞报告"，或漏洞已验证到位准备交付时；或 /report。EN: Turns confirmed vulnerabilities into submission-ready DOCX reports for SRC/0day platforms (verification gates, fixed layout, step-style PoC, mandatory real screenshots). Trigger on "write report" or /report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中文网文投稿与过稿诊断。当用户要投稿/签约、想知道稿子能不能过编辑审核、写书名简介标签、做黄金三章过稿自检、记录某次投稿没过的原因、或问"为什么没签约/怎么提高过稿率"时使用。按平台签约标准体检、读写投稿记录、按历史拒因避免重犯。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves and analyzes FHIR Coverage and Organization resources to produce a structured insurance summary with coordination of benefits analysis. Use when user asks to "check insurance", "coverage details", "verify coverage", "insurance summary", "what plan is the patient on", "primary vs secondary insurance", or "coverage status". Do NOT use for clinical data, demographics beyond insurance, or billing claim submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for insurance-claims operations with Stedi whenever the user asks to submit claims, validate claim payloads, check claim status, retrieve/interpret 277CA or 835 responses, troubleshoot payer/provider enrollment requirements, or build deterministic claims workflows. Trigger this skill even if the user does not say "Stedi" explicitly but mentions 837/835/277CA/ERA, payer IDs, claim rejection codes, claim resubmission, COB, or healthcare clearinghouse automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute Guidewire primary workflow: Policy lifecycle management in PolicyCenter. Use when implementing quoting, binding, issuing, endorsing, or renewing policies. Trigger with phrases like "policycenter workflow", "create policy", "bind submission", "issue policy", "policy endorsement", "quote insurance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a regulatory filing, disclosure notice, or government submission. Use when asked to "prepare a regulatory filing", "handle a state registration", or "draft a government disclosure".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hacker News post crafter — given a product, feature, or story produces a ready-to-post HN submission (title ≤80 chars, no marketing), honest body text with technical depth, no outbound links, predicted reception analysis, and comment-response templates for likely pushback. Use when asked to "write an HN post", "craft a Show HN", "prepare our Hacker News launch", or "help me post on HN".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LaTeX document authoring with arXiv submission best practices, Overleaf patterns, and academic publishing conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit skill lifecycle by tracing call chains, detecting circular dependencies, finding instruction contradictions, identifying duplicated datasets, analyzing bidirectional coherence, discovering scriptable sequences, and learning patterns. Use when checking skill coherence, validating skill workflow, finding semantic gaps in plugin structure, or auditing plugin before marketplace submission. Generates audit reports to .plugin-creator/audits/ with findings by dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds or audits a social-science replication package and evaluates the manuscript and archived research objects against FAIR principles. Scaffold mode writes the folder structure, README, master.R, figure-table crosswalk, codebook, LICENSE placeholder, and .gitignore; audit mode grades the package against a pre-release checklist and audits data, code, materials, identifiers, licenses, access restrictions, and availability statements. Use when setting up or repairing a package, checking one before submission, auditing FAIR compliance, or drafting availability statements. Adapted from Yusaku Horiuchi’s replication-package-guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-stage QA for a finished figure and table set (callouts, numbering, cross-references, text-to-exhibit consistency, captions and notes, accessibility, SI and replication linkage). Use when preparing a submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Typeset a working paper or journal submission in house-style LaTeX from Markdown, Word, TeX, ODT, RTF, or HTML. Use to convert drafts, build PDFs, or prepare journal-specific spacing, limits, anonymization, disclosures, and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold or audit a social-science replication package, and audit the manuscript and archived research objects against FAIR. Use when setting up or repairing a package, checking one before submission, or drafting data, code, and materials availability statements. Adapted from Yusaku Horiuchi's replication-package-guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect AI/LLM-generated text patterns in research writing. Use when: (1) Reviewing manuscript drafts before submission, (2) Pre-commit validation of documentation, (3) Quality assurance checks on research artifacts, (4) Ensuring natural academic writing style, (5) Tracking writing authenticity over time. Analyzes grammar perfection, sentence uniformity, paragraph structure, word frequency (AI-typical words like 'delve', 'leverage', 'robust'), punctuation patterns, and transition word overuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories and registries where they can submit or list an MCP server (Model Context Protocol server) — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and discovery by agent builders. Triggers on "where do I list my MCP server", "best MCP directories", "MCP registries to submit to", "get my MCP server discovered", or "pull submission details for these MCP-directory domains", even when described indirectly (we built an MCP server, where do we publish it). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-ai-directories for general AI-tool / AI-agent / agent-skill listings, and to find-product-directories for general SaaS/software launches. Skip building an MCP server or asking how MCP works (DIY), finding a firm to build one (use find-ai-consultancy / find-software-developer), and MCP link-building *services*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories and listing sites where they can submit an AI product — an AI tool, AI app, AI agent, or agent skill / plugin — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and discovery. Triggers on "where can I list my AI tool", "directories to submit my AI agent", "agent-skills directories", "best AI tool directories for backlinks", "where do I get my GPT/Claude app discovered", or "pull submission details for these AI-directory domains", even when described indirectly (we built an AI agent, where do we get it in front of people). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings specifically, and to find-product-directories for general SaaS/software/app launches with no AI angle. Skip finding an AI consultancy/agency to hire (use find-ai-consultancy), comparing AI products ("ChatGPT vs Claude"), building an AI tool (do-the-work), and AI link-building *services*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories, listing sites, or launch platforms where they can submit a software product, SaaS, app, tool, or startup — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and launch-day reach. Triggers on "where can I submit my SaaS for launch", "list of Product Hunt alternatives", "directories to get backlinks for our app", "high-authority software listing sites", "where should I list my startup", or "pull submission details for these 8 directory domains", even when described indirectly (we're launching next week, where do we post; how do we get backlinks by listing in directories). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings and find-ai-directories for AI-tool / AI-agent / agent-skill listings. Skip finding a firm/agency to hire (use the find-* agency skills), finding products *inside* a directory ("recommend the best CRM"), building a directory site (do-the-work), local/business directories for brick-and-mortar listings, and link-building *services*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Icarus Figures produces publication-grade figures for scientific papers — reproducible matplotlib/seaborn data figures and original TikZ method/framework/architecture figures, held to a four-axis quality bar (depth · elegance · unimpeachable · visible-gap) and exported as editable PDF+PNG+SVG with a runnable critique gate. Use this whenever a figure is destined for a paper, journal, conference submission, thesis, or report — making a plot/chart publication- or journal-ready, building a method/architecture/framework diagram or 技术路线图 (the hero figure a paper opens with), a schematic or workflow figure, or cleaning up a matplotlib/seaborn/TikZ figure that currently looks like a homework plot. Trigger even when the user never says "publication": if the figure goes into a written scientific document, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。