「systematic」の検索結果

Systematic 4-phase debugging framework for Unity projects with GameDebug wrapper generation. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes. Triggers on requests like "this doesn't work", "there's a bug", "it crashes when", "fix this error", "why is this happening", "null reference exception", "test is failing", "unexpected behavior", "something broke", or any debugging task. Four-phase framework (gather evidence, isolate, hypothesize, fix) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrician — sizing a service panel upgrade with an NEC load calculation, troubleshooting a tripping breaker or dead circuit systematically, checking wire gauge/ampacity and voltage drop for a circuit run, resolving a code-vs-inspector interpretation dispute, or deciding when a job (aluminum wiring, knob-and-tube, undersized service) exceeds the immediate scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an astronomer — calculating exposure time or signal-to-noise for a target, writing the feasibility math for a telescope-time proposal, reducing photometric or spectroscopic data, distinguishing a systematic error floor from statistical noise, or reviewing an observational result for calibration or upper-limit red flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic technical debt analysis across architecture, testing, documentation, and infrastructure. Investigates the codebase, scores findings by impact and effort, and generates a prioritized TECH_DEBT.md remediation plan. Delegates to specialized skills for code quality (scout) and linting (lint-fix). Use when assessing overall project health, planning cleanup sprints, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe systematic dependency upgrade with vulnerability scanning and rollback capability. Detects project ecosystem, audits outdated and vulnerable packages, presents a prioritized upgrade plan, and executes upgrades one at a time with test verification after each. Use when updating dependencies, fixing vulnerability alerts, or performing periodic dependency maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evaluation frameworks for LLM systems — harness design, graders, datasets, regression tracking, and human-in-the-loop eval. Use when you need systematic measurement of model or agent quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic drug repurposing — computational screening, evidence triangulation, and validation strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineer the full context a model sees — system prompts, retrieved knowledge, tool definitions, state, and history as one designed artifact. Use when moving beyond prompt tweaks to systematic context design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic contract review assistance — clause extraction, risk flagging, and comparison — use when analyzing agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging: reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify — with tooling for hard bugs. Use when stuck on a bug, flaky failure, or production incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a threat model document. Use when the user says "threat model", "threat modeling", "STRIDE analysis", "attack surface analysis", "security design review", "what are the threats to this system", "adversarial analysis", "identify threats", "security threat assessment", or needs to systematically identify and document threats to a system or feature - even if they don't explicitly say "threat model".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a literature review. Use when the user says "literature review", "lit review", "review the literature", "summarize prior research", "what does the research say about", "synthesize research on", "background section", "related work section", "what has been studied on this topic", or needs to systematically identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate existing research on a topic - even if they don't explicitly say "literature review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and document a marketing growth experiment. Use when the user says "run a growth experiment", "test this channel", "growth test", "I want to experiment with [channel]", "traction experiment", "acquisition experiment", "let's test if [channel] works for us", "bullseye framework", "which channels should we try", "run a traction test", or wants to systematically test a marketing or acquisition channel before committing budget. For page-level conversion hypotheses, see page-cro. For copy variants to test, see ab-copy-writer. For recording the result, see retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug a bug or unexpected behavior systematically. Use when the user says "there's a bug", "this isn't working", "I'm getting an error", "help me debug", "why is this failing", "unexpected behavior", "test is failing", "something is broken", or describes behavior that doesn't match expectations - even if they don't say "debug".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate structured requirements gathering. Use when the user says "gather requirements", "elicitation session", "stakeholder interview", "requirements workshop", "what do the users need", "discover requirements", "trawl for requirements", "understand the business need", "conduct interviews", or needs to systematically extract requirements from stakeholders - even if they don't explicitly say "elicitation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose a business problem MECE using an issue tree, generate hypotheses, and prioritize branches for investigation. Use when a consultant says "help me structure this problem", "I need to break down this issue", "build me an issue tree", "I don't know where to start on this problem", "help me frame the problem", "what are the hypotheses here", "we need to prioritize our analysis", or "the client problem is too broad". Also trigger when describing a complex or ambiguous business problem that needs systematic decomposition before analysis begins, or when an engagement is starting and a workplan needs to be structured from a problem statement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to systematically fix AI code slop — duplicated logic, over-engineering, silent error swallowing, convention drift, cargo-cult patterns, and other LLM-introduced architectural decay — over a specified duration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test any software project (CLI, API, Backend, Library, etc.) to find bugs, usability issues, and edge cases. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence (exact commands, inputs, logs, and tracebacks) for every issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-like loop that uses ultrawork mode to decompose work into systematic, evidence-bound steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mutation testing workflow. Systematically mutates source code to verify tests actually catch bugs. Multi-session with progress tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。