「utc」の検索結果

Local-only regression / benchmark skill for ui-clone-skills maintainers. Drives the standard ui-reverse-engineering pipeline against the canonical reference site (https://realfood.gov) and records AE/SSIM, iteration count, gate fail counts, and outcome to benchmark/history.csv so prompt / sub-doc / model-version drift surfaces as a trend. Trigger phrases: "run benchmark" / "regression benchmark" / "benchmark clone". The Makefile no longer has a `benchmark` target — setup is inline bash in this skill (Step 1 below). Internal: NOT registered in `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` `skills`. Not part of the public 3-skill marketplace surface. Maintainer tooling only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prices research, tests, surveys, dashboards and experiments before running them, by computing how much the result would raise expected utility - which is zero whenever no outcome would change the decision. Use when someone proposes an A/B test, user survey, market study, competitor analysis, analytics build, consultant, pilot, or "let's gather more data", and when deciding how large a study needs to be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level machine design covering shafts, bearings, gears, fasteners, springs, clutches, brakes, and mechanical power transmission systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a flow-level summary of the current Claude Code session — executive summary, chronological timeline, and outcomes — written into the active feature directory next to spec.md / plan.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every progress update, status report, problem explanation, ETA, review, acceptance, or completion report to the operator/owner, especially when they ask “到哪了”, “什么问题”, “做了什么”, “结果呢”, “还要多久”, or “说人话”. Translate technical evidence into visible or operational outcomes before details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pursue an agreed goal to a working outcome without waiting: decompose it, re-prioritise as evidence arrives, branch, gate, get an independent review (a different model or a fresh reviewer subagent — the writer never approves), merge, prune, and bank the operator's decisions in STATUS.md instead of blocking on them. Trigger on "get it done", "don't wait for me", "proceed autonomously", or when an epic or roadmap objective is handed over. Not a close-out: this work set is expected to grow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Method for adding agent comments and work to a shared file without overlapping other agents. Creates isolated workspaces per agent with UTC timestamps. Use when told to add comments, reviews, or work to any file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill when writing, reviewing, or interpreting behavioral accessibility automation — tests that manipulate a rendered page (resizing the viewport, pressing real keys, capturing and comparing screenshots) rather than only inspecting static markup or a single computed accessibility tree. Covers Reflow risk (SC 1.4.10) and Focus Visible risk (SC 2.4.7) checks. Absolutely always report indicator results separately from confirmed failures. Under no circumstances treat a clean behavioral scan as WCAG conformance, or collapse `cantTell`/test-error/indicator outcomes into a single pass/fail signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户询问 ClinicalTrials.gov / 临床试验 / NCT / 试验注册 / 招募状态 / phase 1/2/3 / RCT lookup / sponsor 检索 / interventional trial / observational study / 主次要终点 / trial outcomes / 试验招募中 / recruiting status 时,通过 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 实时检索官方注册数据。专注实时单次查询(≤1000 条/请求),典型场景: "某 NCT 试验最新状态"、"BTK 抑制剂 Phase 3 在招募试验"、"某试验已发布的主次要终点结果"。明确边界: 批量 >10k 试验 / 全库 SQL 历史分析 → aact-bulk-trials; 关联 PubMed 文献 → pubmed-eutils; RCT 自动 GRADE 评级 → medical-evidence-grading; 引用入报告附录 → evidence-appendix-sync。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Cursor 通用)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up authorized C2 simulation workflows and measure defensive detection outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design phishing and social engineering simulations with explicit authorization and measurable outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and improves task-specific decision artifacts from application requirements and labeled records. Use for data assembly, primitive and base-model selection, fitting, export/reload, inference policy, or bounded data/model/program improvement. Includes rules and no-training outcomes; does not require a rung ladder or training a general Jev.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an evidence-backed working model of an existing codebase. Use when you must orient in a large or unfamiliar repository; explain architecture or a subsystem; trace a request, runtime, control, or data flow for a concrete question or bug; analyze a branch, commit, diff, or pull request for behavioral impact and blast radius; or assess AI-generated or changed code against requirements, contracts, invariants, tests, and runtime evidence. Default to read-only investigation. Do not trigger only because a coding task touches an existing repository; use when understanding or verification is the requested outcome or a substantial prerequisite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

XML-specified Android UI journey testing, interactive step execution, assertion verification, and JSON outcome reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route agent work through AccInt's MCP memory loop: retrieve prior outcomes, resolve frames, and close commitments with evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating a completed or in-progress project across scope, correctness, quality, testing, and learning outcomes using structured Praise-Critique-Grow feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product-discovery coach for Fishbowl engineers — inspired by Marty Cagan's work (never impersonates him). Stage-routes between opportunity brief, research, PRD, ticket drafting, and outcome review. Triggers on "product coach", "help me with product", "I need to write a PRD", "I want to do discovery", "opportunity assessment", "who is this for", "why are we building this", or when an engineer is starting, resuming, or post-mortem-ing product-adjacent work. Invoke with a short description of what you want to do, or invoke bare to be surveyed and routed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one anonymised DRAFT case study (situation, approach, outcome as evidenced, optional lessons) from engagement notes, status reports, closing reports, emails and metrics extracts the user supplies, with a fact trace to the notes, an evidence grade on every result, quotes only where the user supplied them with speaker role and permission, an anonymisation log and a confidentiality checklist that must be completed before publication. Use when the user asks to "write a case study from these notes", "turn this engagement into a customer story", "draft a success story for the website", "anonymise this project write-up" or "prepare a reference case for the proposal". Do not use for redacting identifiers from an existing document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; for checking whether a document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one meeting transcript, recording recap or set of raw notes into concise DRAFT minutes returned in the chat as a single Markdown document: header metadata, attendance and apologies, agenda items each with a short neutral summary and outcome, numbered decisions with an owner, numbered action items with owner and due date, open questions, carried-over actions and the next-meeting line, every entry backed by a short verbatim source fragment and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "write the minutes", "draft minutes from this transcript", "turn these notes into meeting minutes", "produce the minutes of meeting for today's call", "tidy my rough minutes into the standard format" or "prepare the minutes for circulation". Do not use for extracting action items, task lists or per-owner follow-up emails alone, use transcript-to-actions instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a new hire from the role, the team context and the systems list: phase outcomes traced to the role, activities with a named owner and due window, an access and equipment request table, learning items, manager checkpoints and the items the manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an onboarding plan for our new hire", "draft the induction plan for this role", "write a first 90 days plan", "put together a new starter plan with owners", "create a ramp plan from this job description" or "plan the integration of an internal mover". Do not use for writing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for interview questions or a scorecard, use interview-scorecard-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a DRAFT self-assessment, peer feedback note or manager review narrative from the evidence the writer supplies (goals, examples, metrics, notes), in the review template where given: every sentence tied to a numbered evidence item, unsupported claims removed and logged, and a gaps list to complete before submitting. Never assigns, suggests or implies a rating, score, ranking, pay or promotion outcome. Use when the user asks to "write my self-assessment", "draft peer feedback for a colleague", "turn these notes into a performance review", "help me write the year-end review for my report", "summarise my achievements against my goals" or "draft the mid-year review". Do not use for a job description or role profile, use job-description-drafter instead; for a new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct a daily or weekly worklog from observed activity and outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。