「can」の検索結果

Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement multi-stage CI/CD pipelines using GitHub Actions with matrix builds, dependency caching, artifact management, and secret handling. Create workflows that span linting, testing, building, and deployment stages with parallel execution and conditional logic. Use when setting up automated testing and deployment for a new project, migrating from Jenkins or CircleCI to GitHub Actions, implementing matrix builds across platforms, adding build caching, or creating multi-stage pipelines with security scanning and quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to identify functions, APIs, and data sources suitable for exposure as MCP tools, producing a tool specification document. Use when planning an MCP server for an existing project, auditing a codebase before wrapping it as an AI-accessible tool surface, comparing what a codebase can do versus what is already exposed via MCP, or generating a tool spec to hand off to scaffold-mcp-server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a local coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or similar) needs to operate Multica through the authenticated `multica` CLI: reading or updating issues, comments, metadata, labels, custom properties, subscribers, projects, agents, squads, runtimes, repos, skills, autopilots, attachments, or workspace state; searching issues; inspecting or cancelling agent runs; replying to a Multica issue from an external agent; creating or triaging issues; checking linked pull requests; or safely handling Multica mention/status side effects without relying on the Multica hosted agent runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The TaskBarHero game updated (new version) and the tbh-meter reader needs re-calibration — symptoms are gold showing 0, stage mode "?", or the live party/XP/stats dropping out (party empty / no live levels / runs degraded) after a patch, or you're prepping a meter release for a new game build. Runs the diagnose→dump→diff→reseed→bump→verify playbook (the fix is usually a reseed, but a build can also change an Obscured encoding with zero offset movement — caught only by the live gate, fixed by a read-strategy change). Use when the game version changed, after a TBH patch, when a player reports gold/stage/party/XP broken following an update, or when asked to re-seed / re-calibrate the reader for a new build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate format-controlled research reports with evidence tracking, citations, and iterative review. This skill should be used when users request a research report, literature review, market or industry analysis, competitive landscape, policy or technical brief, or require a strict report template and section formatting that a single deepresearch pass cannot reliably enforce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把用户对 HarmonyOS、ArkUI、Canvas 或代码生成产品动效的模糊描述转换为准确术语、相近概念和可能的 ArkUI 能力，例如“松手像急刹车”“拖过头有阻力”“页面像从同一个卡片长出来”“后端没完成却显示成功”。用于命名、检索和编写提示词；不要用于完整设计审视、传统视频剪辑、镜头叙事、直接实现或构建问题。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and reviews Swift App Intents code that exposes app actions and data to Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence. Use when adding AppIntent, AppEntity, OpenIntent, AppShortcutsProvider, EntityQuery, Focus Filters, AssistantEntity/AssistantIntent schemas, on-screen awareness, LongRunningIntent/CancellableIntent, EntityCollection, SyncableEntity, AppIntentsTesting, or when wiring SwiftData/networked data into intents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a 50-minute live iOS launch sprint across the lightweight requirements, Claude Design handoff, SwiftUI implementation, landing page, ASO, Simulator screenshot, promo-video, and privacy-scan skills bundled in this plugin. Use as the main entry point when the whole talk workflow should be planned or executed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to find, prioritize, or engage B2B prospects — defining an ICP, tiering accounts, building or enriching lists, reading buying signals, designing multi-channel cadences, cold calling, LinkedIn outreach, routing inbound leads, or diagnosing weak pipeline generation. Also for live prospecting coaching. Not for closing (use sales-skill), copy (use copywriter-skill), or CAC analysis (use channel-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to scope, write, or audit a product spec — a PRD, feature spec, user stories, acceptance criteria, or a "spec this out"/"break this into stories"/"definition of done" request — or wants an existing spec reviewed for gaps and anti-patterns. Triggers whenever a feature idea needs to become structured requirements that align a team on what to build. For the analytics behind success metrics, use data-analysis; for the technical design, use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, auditing, or speccing a video's motion and visual craft: shot lists, storyboards, color scripts, transitions, easing, kinetic typography, pacing, retention, or animation principles. Triggers: 'video plan', 'shot list', 'storyboard', 'color script', 'motion spec', 'fix the pacing', 'explainer/demo/brand video'. For the spoken words themselves, use script-writer-skill; for in-code UI motion, use frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is working a B2B SaaS deal from qualified opportunity to closed-won — preparing discovery calls, structuring demos or POCs, handling a specific objection, qualifying with MEDDIC/MEDDPICC/SPICED, building mutual action plans, navigating negotiation or procurement, or reviewing pipeline health, forecast accuracy, and deal velocity. Not for finding or prospecting new leads (use prospecting) or upstream positioning (use product-position).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a non-designer needs to audit a UI, generate a design spec (spacing, type scale, color tokens, grids), or build brand foundations (logo systems, palette and type pairing, brand guidelines). Covers the visual layer, UX/perceptual critique, and brand identity. For implementing the design in code (React/HTML/CSS), use frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to write, rewrite, review, or critique commercial copy meant to drive a reader toward action — landing pages, hero sections, headlines, email (cold outreach, nurture, promo, launch), CTAs, microcopy, product descriptions, value propositions, ads, or taglines. Also for copy audits, clarity checks, conversion reviews, or choosing a framework (AIDA, PAS, BAB, FAB, 4U's). Applies even when the user just says "write me an email" or "review this page." Not for channel/budget strategy (use channel-expert) or pricing structure (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the deliverable is spoken words to be performed on camera or into a mic: video and podcast scripts, hooks, and CTAs for short-form (TikTok, Reels, Shorts), YouTube long-form, or podcast episodes. Triggers: "write me a reel about X", "I need a hook for my video", "script a 60-second video", "draft a podcast episode", "turn this idea into a script". For motion/timing/shot specs rather than the words, use motion-picture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is deciding, reviewing, or second-guessing a software architecture or tech-stack choice — monolith vs microservices vs serverless vs event-driven, backend language, database type, caching, CQRS/event sourcing, polyglot, or a migration like Strangler Fig. Triggers on "should I use microservices", "which database", "tech stack for", "system design", or "architecture review". For how to deploy, operate, and scale that design (CI/CD, cloud, Kubernetes, IaC), use devops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to deploy, operate, secure, or scale running infrastructure — cloud architecture (multi-region, VPC, FinOps), CI/CD and deployment strategies, secrets/IAM/supply-chain security, observability and SLO alerting, SRE and incident response, Kubernetes vs ECS and autoscaling, Terraform/Pulumi/CDK, or platform engineering and DORA metrics. Also for generating runbooks, pipeline configs, Terraform modules, or Kubernetes manifests. For choosing the system's architecture or stack before it runs (monolith vs microservices, which database), use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a B2B SaaS founder needs to choose, prioritize, or rebalance customer acquisition channels — deciding outbound vs inbound, paid vs PLG, where to put marketing budget, or sanity-checking CAC, LTV:CAC, and payback. Also for channel-specific playbooks (cold email, LinkedIn, paid social, community, partnerships) and channel-mix audits. Not for closing tactics (use sales-skill) or copy (use copywriter-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a SaaS founder is deciding on or building a product-led growth motion — assessing PLG readiness, choosing freemium vs free trial vs reverse trial, defining activation and PQLs, designing self-serve onboarding and conversion triggers, building viral loops, or setting up PLG metrics (NRG, activation rate, TTV, NDR, CAC payback) and cohort analysis. Also for hybrid product-led-sales design and PLG-vs-sales-led GTM decisions. Not for paid acquisition channel mix (use channel-expert) or the mechanics of price points and tiers (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。