「audit」の検索結果

Define auditable QA metrics with explicit numerators, denominators, populations, windows, and treatment of every result state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to set up pwdev-feat in a project — 'inicializar o pwdev-feat', 'configurar o feat', 'init feat workspace' — choosing language, model profile and the optional audit trail, and creating the .planning/feat/ workspace. Do NOT use to analyze the codebase (feat-map), to write the project instructions file (feat-setup) or to create plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gates determinísticos para PHP e Laravel. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate PHP", "quality gate Laravel", "PHPStan", "Larastan", "Pest", "PHPUnit", "PHPMD", "Composer Audit", cobertura PHP ou baseline PHP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, documenta e aplica a voz da marca — formalidade, personalidade, vocabulário preferido, palavras proibidas e tratamento do leitor. Use quando o usuário disser "voz da marca", "tom de voz", "brand voice", "guia de estilo", "padronizar o tom", "não parece nossa marca", "manual de redação", ou quando precisar auditar se um texto está aderente. Extrai a voz de amostras reais em vez de inventar adjetivos, e grava o resultado na seção 5 de .claude/pwdev-copy-context.md para todas as demais skills consumirem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Segurança de infraestrutura e pipeline — Trivy, Falco, CrowdSec, Fail2Ban, WAF, TLS, IAM, secrets, OWASP, Security Hub. Use quando o usuário disser "segurança", "vulnerabilidade", "CVE", "hardening", "WAF", "secrets", "exposto", "auditoria de segurança", "pentest".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a GTK4/libadwaita app accessible — accessible labels and roles, tooltips on icon-only buttons, keyboard navigation, contrast, and testing with Orca/Accerciser. Use when fixing a11y issues or running the accessibility category of a HIG audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactively search for security threats, vulnerabilities, and suspicious patterns in applications and infrastructure before they cause damage. Use when conducting security audits, identifying vulnerabilities, analyzing security logs, detecting suspicious patterns, investigating potential breaches, performing penetration testing, or implementing security monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-phase memory hygiene. Phase 1: scan external Claude Code memory (~/.claude/projects/<slug>/memory/) for durable rules to migrate into the repo and entries already duplicated by repo atoms. Phase 2: audit in-repo memory/, CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture/, and docs/sections/ for dead links, duplication, drift, and bloat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce the cross-section read interface boundary (I<Section>ServiceRead) for one section's service per memory/architecture/section-read-write-split.md. Audits the surface, evaluates which methods belong on the read interface, sets up the workspace, dispatches a subagent that introduces the interface and migrates non-section callers, opens a PR. Use when the user says 'read split for X', 'split <Section>Service', 'add I<Section>ServiceRead boundary', 'apply the section-read-write-split rule to <Section>', or any variation of carving the cross-section read surface out of a section's full service interface. Reference implementation is Teams (PR 678). Operates on one section per invocation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to add, fix, or optimize schema markup and structured data on their site. Also use when the user mentions "schema markup," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "FAQ schema," "product schema," "review schema," "breadcrumb schema," "Google rich results," "knowledge panel," "star ratings in search," or "add structured data." Use this whenever someone wants their pages to show enhanced results in Google. For broader SEO issues, see seo-audit. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform security audits for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and Apache HTTPD in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with cloud-specific hardening verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and update metadata across multiple AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Scans pages via the query index, identifies missing or inconsistent metadata (titles, descriptions, og tags, robots), and generates a corrected bulk metadata spreadsheet. Use when standardizing metadata across a site, preparing for launch, or fixing SEO issues at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two versions of an AEM Edge Delivery Services page to identify what changed. Fetches preview vs live, or two different URLs, and produces a detailed content diff showing added, removed, and modified content, metadata, and blocks. Use when reviewing changes before publishing, auditing content modifications, or tracking content evolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and generate specific fixes. Identifies missing alt text, heading hierarchy issues, link text problems, color contrast concerns, and EDS-specific accessibility patterns. Use when fixing accessibility issues, preparing for compliance audits, or remediating WCAG violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route code cleanup, maintainability, React diagnostics, and over-engineering review to focused review modes. Use when auditing code quality or asking for a particular review lens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。