Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5,727 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API documentation workflow for generating OpenAPI specs, creating developer guides, and maintaining comprehensive API documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. ) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just "ChatGPT but different" - products that solve specific problems with AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master API documentation with OpenAPI 3.1, AI-powered tools, and modern developer experience practices. Create interactive docs, generate SDKs, and build comprehensive developer portals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches. AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migration guide for Swift and iOS. Use when migrating ObservableObject to @Observable (iOS 17), enabling Swift 6/6.2 Strict Concurrency, fixing @MainActor/Sendable warnings, adopting Approachable Concurrency (Swift 6.2), or handling iPadOS 26 windowing system changes (UIRequiresFullScreen deprecation). Covers breaking changes and version upgrade tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build EcoSIM atmospheric greenhouse-gas forcing files by combining a historical monthly atmgas NetCDF with RCMIP/CMIP6 SSP concentration pathways. Use when Codex needs SSP245/SSP585 or other SSP atmospheric CO2, CH4, and N2O concentrations, key-year tables, or scenario NetCDF files spanning historical years through 2100 for EcoSIM or related biogeochemical forcing workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract point-scale CMIP6 historical and SSP future climate data from the Pangeo Google Cloud catalog and convert them into bias-corrected additive or multiplicative anomalies for LSM or EcoSIM climate forcing. Use when a task needs site latitude/longitude, scenario-specific CMIP6 variables, vapor pressure derived from huss and ps, calendar-aware day-of-year climatologies, or projected change summaries for the 2050s and 2090s.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produz vídeo curto — roteiro, storyboard, prompts por cena e geração via Runway quando há chave. Use quando o usuário disser "vídeo", "reels", "roteiro de vídeo", "Runway", "Higgsfield", "animação", "storyboard", "vídeo de IA". Runway gera de fato a partir de imagem; Higgsfield não tem API pública estável e segue manual. Vídeo é o item mais caro da stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aumenta resolução e qualidade de imagem via Freepik/Magnific, ou orienta o processo manual quando não há chave. Use quando o usuário disser "upscale", "melhorar a resolução", "a imagem está pixelada", "Magnific", "Freepik", "aumentar a imagem", "imagem pequena demais". Gasta crédito — exige confirmação.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enable, record, query, summarize, or verify the opt-in PWDEV Flow semantic audit trail. Use when the user asks what Flow actions occurred, wants audit integrity checked, or needs a portable JSONL record of workflow gates and artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a change is small and already understood - at most three files, such as a typo, a config value, a rename, or a one-line bugfix - and a plan file would cost more than the change
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inventory, archive, and summarize PWDEV Flow project history safely. Use when the user asks to find stale artifacts, archive completed work, clean the Flow workspace without deletion, or generate a changelog from verified history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants tests planned for existing code or a test audit — unit, integration, E2E scenarios exportable to Playwright, playwright-cli UI checks, a coverage matrix — 'criar testes para o UserService', 'plano de testes E2E do login', 'auditar a cobertura'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), for implementing features (feat-feature) or to run an existing plan (feat-exec).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user, inside an Orca terminal, asks Hermes to resolve, dispatch, orchestrate or supervise GitHub issues with Orca workers — 'orquestrar as issues 12, 15 e 18 no Orca', 'despachar as issues com label ready', 'coordenar workers do Orca para estas issues', or to resume such a Run after compaction. Do NOT use for a single unsupervised hand-off to another agent (Orca CLI directly), for working on one issue in this session (pwdev-feat feat-loop), or outside Orca.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a small, well-bounded change done now without a plan file — a bugfix, config change, rename, doc update or simple refactor touching 1–5 files — 'corrigir rapidinho', 'quick fix no X', 'renomear Y'. Presents a mini-plan, implements after approval, verifies and commits. Do NOT use for more than 5 files, architectural decisions, migrations or new UI flows (use feat-feature / feat-backend / feat-frontend).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a UI-only action plan — components, pages, composables/hooks, state, forms and their E2E coverage — 'plano de frontend para a tela X', 'plan the settings page'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md with E2E scenarios and playwright-cli checks. Do NOT use for API/database work (feat-backend), full features (feat-feature), writing code (feat-exec) or UI review (feat-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to query the local pwdev audit trail — 'ver auditoria', 'relatório de auditoria', 'audit stats', 'exportar auditoria em PDF' — summary, events, decisions, artifacts, statistics, a Markdown/PDF export or a custom read-only SELECT. Do NOT use to enable the audit (feat-init) or for plan status (feat-status).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Super-skill for developing Haskell projects with cabal nix-style builds. Orchestrates HLS diagnostics, Haddock, Hoogle, source formatting, and cabal-gild into one workflow. Use when writing, editing, refactoring, building, typechecking, fixing compiler errors, renaming symbols, looking up APIs, or changing dependencies in Haskell projects. Treat cabal.project as the source of truth, prefer HLS before full builds, and prefer local docs over remote lookup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build efficient React applications using Next.js Server Components that render on the server, reducing client bundle size, improving performance, and enabling direct database access. Use when fetching data server-side, reducing JavaScript bundle size, accessing databases directly in components, implementing streaming with Suspense, creating layouts that only render once, optimizing Core Web Vitals, or building SEO-friendly applications with server-first architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement test-driven development (TDD) workflow using the red-green-refactor cycle. Use when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring existing code. Always write the failing test first, then implement minimal code to pass, then refactor. Essential for ensuring code reliability, preventing regressions, improving design through testability requirements, documenting expected behavior through tests, enabling confident refactoring, and maintaining high code quality standards throughout the development process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve code structure, readability, and maintainability without changing external behavior through systematic refactoring techniques like extracting functions, removing duplication, simplifying conditionals, and applying design patterns. Use when reducing technical debt, extracting functions or classes, removing code duplication, simplifying complex conditionals, renaming for clarity, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing coupling, increasing cohesion, or maintaining test coverage during structural improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。