7,765 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build complete userModels for people Claudicle collaborates with. Creates core persona files, social dossiers with voice analysis, content archives, and INDEX registration. Use when asked to create a user model, build a persona, or document someone's voice and identity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summon Claude Fable 5.1 (Mythos-class, xenos theoros) by default, or Fable 5.0 (--naos). Handles model override, cost awareness, and task routing. Availability probed at invocation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-labeled semantic cores for SEO, LLM-readable architecture, and site information design. Use this skill when the user asks for semantic core, query clusters, search intents, audience segments, entity/topic maps, language or locale priorities, competitor/source evidence, pillar-topic planning, or a structured handoff before URL architecture and internal linking. It must mark unknown search volume, difficulty, and ranking data as unknown instead of inventing metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a semantic core into crawlable SEO and LLM-friendly information architecture. Use this skill when the user asks for URL structure, page taxonomy, canonical rules, hreflang groups, page roles, pillar/topic/news/article/blog/project separation, multilingual route strategy, or a durable content model such as one short brief plus one longform article. It prevents duplicate public content bodies and hands link-graph work to internal-link-graph-architect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design deterministic technical SEO and schema.org guidance for crawlable public pages. Use this skill when the user asks for title and meta description rules, canonical and hreflang tags, JSON-LD schema, NewsArticle, Article, TechArticle, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, sitemap, news-sitemap, RSS, robots.txt, llms.txt, publisher logo, ImageObject, or metadata templates that must match visible content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process an online course into detailed vault notes — one per lecture, with slides and transcripts synthesized. Use this skill whenever the user shares a course URL, syllabus page, or lecture playlist and wants structured notes from it. Also triggers on "process this course", "take notes on these lectures", "course notes", any university course page, or when someone pastes a link to a course with multiple lectures/sessions. Even if the user just says "check out this course" or drops a .edu link with a schedule — use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create slide presentations from topics, URLs, PDFs, git repos, or vault notes. Use this skill when the user asks to make slides, create a presentation, build a deck, or says "slides about X". Handles research, synthesis, outline, and creation. Default output is reveal.js HTML; pptx available on request. Also handles editing existing slide decks (HTML or pptx). Triggers on /slides, /slide-maker, or any request involving presentation creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and optimizes the five global Claude layers (User Preferences, Styles, Global Memory, Skills, MCP Connectors) using the Global Layer Scorecard (six dimensions, anchored 1-5 rubrics). Detects eight cross-layer failure modes and produces evolutionary recommendations (Promotion, Demotion, Codification, Skill Extraction). Use when user says "audit my global setup," "optimize my preferences," "review my Claude configuration," "check my cross-project setup," "are my preferences working," "clean up my global memory," or "what should be in my preferences vs my project." Also use when a user has 3+ Projects and wants to improve their shared foundation. Do NOT use for single-Project audits, Project Memory optimization, or full-stack audits (use rootnode-project-audit, rootnode-memory-optimization, or rootnode-full-stack-audit respectively, if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a local coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or similar) needs to operate Multica through the authenticated `multica` CLI: reading or updating issues, comments, metadata, labels, custom properties, subscribers, projects, agents, squads, runtimes, repos, skills, autopilots, attachments, or workspace state; searching issues; inspecting or cancelling agent runs; replying to a Multica issue from an external agent; creating or triaging issues; checking linked pull requests; or safely handling Multica mention/status side effects without relying on the Multica hosted agent runtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PHPUnit and Pest patterns for any PHP project: test structure, naming, data providers, test doubles (mocks/stubs/fakes), fixtures, and coverage targets. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every PHP plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Structure unit and integration tests with PHPUnit or Pest consistently. - Drive cases with data providers / datasets instead of copy-pasted test bodies. - Use test doubles with discipline — mock collaborators, not the system under test. - Set up and tear down fixtures cleanly and aim for a meaningful coverage target. Do NOT use this skill for: - PHP language idioms — see php-foundation:php-conventions. - Composer / autoloading — see php-foundation:composer-tooling. - Framework-specific test helpers (Laravel RefreshDatabase/actingAs, Symfony WebTestCase/KernelTestCase) — those are injected by the framework plugin's QA phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Form patterns for React: react-hook-form (most common), Formik (legacy/stable), TanStack Form (newer). Validation via zod / yup / valibot. Controlled vs uncontrolled inputs, field arrays, multi-step wizards. Use this skill to: - Wire react-hook-form with a validation schema. - Pick between controlled and uncontrolled patterns. - Build multi-step forms with state preservation. - Handle async validation (e.g., username availability). - Integrate forms with TanStack Query mutations. Do NOT use this skill for: - General state management (see react-state-management). - Routing (see react-routing). - Component conventions (see react-conventions). - Testing forms (see react-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The TaskBarHero game updated (new version) and the tbh-meter reader needs re-calibration — symptoms are gold showing 0, stage mode "?", or the live party/XP/stats dropping out (party empty / no live levels / runs degraded) after a patch, or you're prepping a meter release for a new game build. Runs the diagnose→dump→diff→reseed→bump→verify playbook (the fix is usually a reseed, but a build can also change an Obscured encoding with zero offset movement — caught only by the live gate, fixed by a read-strategy change). Use when the game version changed, after a TBH patch, when a player reports gold/stage/party/XP broken following an update, or when asked to re-seed / re-calibrate the reader for a new build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose tbh-meter problems — reader not attaching, AV/blocked state, slow calibration, missing or invalid runs. Use when debugging meter behavior or reading meter.log / live.json / raw run records / logs records (or the legacy runs.jsonl).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-implementation self-review. Use AFTER finishing ANY code implementation or change — before declaring it done, committing, or opening a PR — to critique your own work: re-read the diff adversarially, confirm unit tests cover every branch/edge, kill duplication, follow clean-code/SOLID and the repo's own docs & invariants, decide if something should become documentation, update/prune memory, and strip outdated comments. Trigger it whenever you've just written or modified code and are about to wrap up, even if the user didn't explicitly ask for a review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Boot and drive the tbh-meter app + reader locally to see a change working — what runs on macOS (UI only; the reader is win32-only) and how to feed the overlay/list fake data. Use when asked to run/start the meter, verify a change in the running app, screenshot the overlay, or reproduce a bug locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。