Apply semantic HTML/JSX and WAI-ARIA correctly and minimally. Apply when implementing any UI, especially forms, interactive components, or when accessibility is mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,956 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply semantic HTML/JSX and WAI-ARIA correctly and minimally. Apply when implementing any UI, especially forms, interactive components, or when accessibility is mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search PubMed biomedical literature with natural language queries powered by Valyu semantic search. Full-text access, integrate into your AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove AI-generated writing patterns from Levantine Arabic (الشامي — Syrian, Lebanese, Palestinian) text. Use when editing or reviewing Levantine dialect text to make it sound authentically human-written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
spec-drift issue が起票され diff トリアージが必要なとき、C11 が再構成した issue 単位の完全 diff を hunk 化し name/type/required/enum/semantics 各軸の影響を before/after/evidence 付きで判定して triage-report を出したいときに使う。
Cloudflare Workersのコードを本番運用品質のベストプラクティスに照らして作成・レビューする。新しいWorkerの実装、Workerコードのレビュー、wrangler.jsoncの設定、streaming・floating promises・global state・secrets・bindings・observabilityなどのanti-pattern確認で使用する。事前学習の記憶よりCloudflare公式ドキュメントからの取得を優先する。
Remove AI-generated writing patterns from Levantine Arabic (الشامي — Syrian, Lebanese, Palestinian) text. Use when editing or reviewing Levantine dialect text to make it sound authentically human-written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic + keyword search and connection-discovery across the user's own Apple Notes via the apple-notes MCP server. Use when the user wants to find, recall, or synthesize something from their notes, or surface non-obvious bridges/related notes. macOS, on-device.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Human and accessibility skill for antislop. Contrast, keyboard, focus, and states for real people. Includes the contrast checker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti Slop: Rules for AI Coding Agents. The core filter. Load always to stop generic AI slop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mobile layout skill for antislop. Use for layouts that reflow on small screens: grids, overflow, tap targets. Load with the core.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UI and visual skill for antislop. Use when building or editing any interface: color, layout, components, motion. Load with the core.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
標準原価差異分析スキル。標準原価(予定原価)と実際原価の差異を価格差異・数量差異に分解し、 材料費・労務費・製造間接費のカテゴリ別に集計・分析する。差異の有利/不利判定、 責任部門の特定、根本原因の仮説提示を行う。CSVデータのアップロードによる自動分析に対応。 Use when: 製造原価の差異分析を行いたいとき。標準原価計算制度の運用、 月次原価差異レポート作成、原価低減活動の効果測定に使用。 Triggers: "標準原価", "原価差異", "価格差異", "数量差異", "standard cost", "cost variance", "price variance", "quantity variance", "予定原価", "操業度差異", "原価管理"
Use only when the user explicitly requests agy, Gemini through agy, Antigravity, or an external-model second opinion for review or research. Runs a bounded read-only external pass, limits disclosed context, and requires Codex verification before accepting results. 中文触发:明确要求 agy、通过 agy 调用 Gemini、Antigravity、外部模型复核或外部第二意见。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/math/quantitative_genetics. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape web pages using Scrapling with anti-bot bypass (like Cloudflare Turnstile), stealth headless browsing, spiders framework, adaptive scraping, and JavaScript rendering. Use when asked to scrape, crawl, or extract data from websites; web_fetch fails; the site has anti-bot protections; write Python code to scrape/crawl; or write spiders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose or enable Session Cartographer semantic search in Codex, including least-privilege localhost access to local Qdrant and the embedding server. Use when setup, Qdrant health, localhost reachability, sandbox network denial, or semantic indexing is in question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a non-explicit romantic scene from authorized adult references with clear consent, identity boundaries, and synthetic-media labeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure the studio, brand, and generation tools. Use on a missing-config report, or when the user says "set up manticore", "change my tools", or "update my studio".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write Estuary derivations in Python — async-generator transforms, Pydantic-typed source/output, optional persistent state, and dependency installation via uv. Use for ML/embeddings, async API calls, or any transform where SQL and TypeScript are awkward. Derivations add complexity and cost (and Python derivations require a private/BYOC data plane) — confirm the user wants a Python derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "python derivation", "write a derivation in python", "embed with a python derivation", "ML derivation", "call an API from a derivation", or anything mentioning model2vec / huggingface / pydantic in a derivation context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。