605 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guide technical communication for software developers. Covers email structure, team messaging etiquette, meeting agendas, and adapting messages for technical vs non-technical audiences. Use when drafting professional messages, preparing meeting communications, or improving written communication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a minimalist marketing plan focused on building an audience through free, authentic content. Use when someone has product-market fit (~100 customers) and wants to scale through marketing or needs a content strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and analyze competitor ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand messaging strategies, pain points highlighted, and creative approaches that resonate with audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, rewriting, or significantly improving a README based on the actual repository structure, commands, and intended audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a shipped changelog into a release narrative — value-not-feature framing, audience-segmented surfaces. Triggers on 'announce the release', 'write changelog post'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When shaping the primary message, supporting proofs and audience-by-message matrix from a locked positioning frame — before any copy or launch beat. Triggers on 'tighten the message stack'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when sequencing a launch — alpha / beta / GA waves, audience-by-wave logic, narrative beats per wave, engineering-readiness gates. Triggers on 'plan the launch', 'sequence GA'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when optimizing AGENTS.md or copilot-instructions.md — deduplicates against .augment/ content, enforces line budgets, and focuses each file on its audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns an ICP or research goal into a plan for finding and scraping suitable directories. Use when the user has a target audience but is unsure where to find them, and wants source categories, queries, and an extraction workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read and analyze Xiaohongshu comments from the user's signed-in Chrome session. Use to collect, export, summarize, or classify comments for content planning, follow-up posts, audience research, reply strategy, and 引流文案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack document generation method for turning implementation, product, or operational work into durable docs with clear audience and ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with paid advertising campaigns on Google Ads, Meta (Facebook/Instagram), LinkedIn, Twitter/X, or other ad platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'PPC,' 'paid media,' 'ROAS,' 'CPA,' 'ad campaign,' 'retargeting,' 'audience targeting,' 'Google Ads,' 'Facebook ads,'...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workshop the shape of this project — audience, components, ambiguities — before drafting the PRD
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when you need to review presentation materials from an audience perspective to improve their quality and effectiveness. Evaluates content clarity, visual design, logical flow, engagement factors, and Marp technical compatibility. Triggers include "review my presentation", "check my slides", "presentation feedback", or when a user has completed a draft presentation and wants comprehensive quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts one internal or external announcement (email, intranet post, town hall script, customer notice or press statement) in the organisation's voice from the facts, audience, sender and style guide the user provides, with a fact trace, reader-questions check, pre-send checks and an approvals checklist left blank for the named approvers. Use when the user asks to "announce this change to all staff", "draft the customer notice", "write the town hall script", "prepare a holding statement" or "rewrite this in our voice". Do not use for a digest of several items, use internal-newsletter-drafter instead; to pre-test a drafted message against personas, use communication-pretest-panel. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews the instructions text and skills of a declarative agent, with its stated capabilities, knowledge sources and audience, for prompt-injection exposure, data-leakage paths, over-broad permissions and missing refusals, and returns an attack-surface map, a findings table with severity, quoted evidence and attack path, one pasteable fix per finding, a probe pack the owner can run and a refusal-coverage table. Use when the user asks to "red-team this agent", "check these instructions for prompt injection", "could this agent leak data", "review the permissions on my agent" or "what should this agent refuse". Do not use for checking a SKILL.md against the format rules, use skill-file-reviewer instead; do not use for designing the launch test set, use agent-evaluation-plan instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT course outline from a training need and audience: learning objectives with an observable verb, condition and standard, modules in a stated order with a duration basis and sources, activities and an assessment plan aligned objective by objective, and a coverage table showing what each objective still lacks. Never sets a pass mark, declares learners competent or invents content. Use when the user asks to "build a course outline", "design a training programme for", "turn this need into modules and objectives", "draft the curriculum for this workshop" or "what should this training cover". Do not use for quiz items from finished content, use training-quiz-builder instead; for needs from surveys and manager notes, use training-needs-synthesis; for a new starter's first weeks, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds one DRAFT message house for a product, service, programme or initiative from the source material the user provides: an umbrella statement, two to four pillars and graded proof points under each, with every proof point that lacks a source flagged, a claim sensitivity table, an audience coverage check and open questions. Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write our messaging framework", "what are the key messages for this launch", "turn this research into messaging pillars" or "test our current messaging against the evidence". Do not use for a campaign one-pager, use campaign-brief-builder instead; to check whether a written document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Marketing Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to specific passages, marketing risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CMO review", "pressure-test the positioning", "what would a CMO say about this", "challenge the launch plan" or "check the messaging and audience". Do not use for price economics, margins or payback, use cfo-reviewer instead; for sales pipeline mechanics, use cro-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。