「budget」の検索結果

Use when configuring, repairing, planning, or running MiniMax H3 locally on a Windows NVIDIA computer, especially when installation compatibility, component sets, resolution, generation-time budget, path, low-VRAM risk, or H3 prompt mode must be chosen from hardware and user requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symbol-level code context for LLM coder-agents: tree-sitter extracts symbols, PageRank ranks them over the cross-file reference graph, and the top class/function signatures are fed to the LLM as a token-budgeted read-only map (not RAG, no vector index, human-auditable). Use when an agent must locate the right files in a large/multi-file repo, when builds/refreshes/scopes a repo-map, or when "model edits the wrong file" needs fixing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay skill — the DECISION + WIRING layer for LM observability that the single-backend skills [[langsmith]], [[phoenix]], [[mlflow]] do NOT cover. Each of those installs one backend; none of them help you DECIDE which backend fits your stack/scale/budget, nor give you a one-line autolog that turns it on fast. Use when starting any LM project, before the first deploy, or the moment someone asks "why did it do that?" and there are no traces to answer with. The skill picks a backend by stack (LangSmith for LangChain/LangGraph; Phoenix for OSS/local OpenTelemetry; MLflow for ML-shops already on MLflow; Langfuse for self-host), wires one-line autolog, verifies traces land, and adds eval hooks — instrumenting BEFORE you need it. Cross-links the first-debug-move skill [[agentsop-prompt-history-inspect]]. Do NOT activate to re-teach a backend you already chose (defer to its own skill), or for non-LM ML experiment tracking with no LLM calls (that is plain MLflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure process costs and fork budgets when changing startup, per-file, per-test, parallel workers, reporting, or coverage paths; use for fork census and performance comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solana transaction construction including instruction building, account resolution, compute budget, priority fees, and versioned transactions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Playwright tests, fixing flaky tests, debugging failures, implementing Page Object Model, configuring CI/CD, optimizing performance, mocking APIs, handling authentication or OAuth, testing accessibility (axe-core), file uploads/downloads, date/time mocking, WebSockets, geolocation, permissions, multi-tab/popup flows, mobile/responsive layouts, touch gestures, GraphQL, error handling, offline mode, multi-user collaboration, third-party services (payments, email verification), console error monitoring, global setup/teardown, test annotations (skip, fixme, slow), test tags (@smoke, @fast, @critical, filtering with --grep), project dependencies, security testing (XSS, CSRF, auth), performance budgets (Web Vitals, Lighthouse), iframes, component testing, canvas/WebGL, service workers/PWA, test coverage, i18n/localization, Electron apps, or browser extension testing. Covers E2E, component, API, visual, accessibility, security, Electron, and extension testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive best practices for robot perception systems covering cameras, LiDARs, depth sensors, IMUs, and multi-sensor setups. Use this skill when working with RGB image processing, depth maps, point clouds, sensor calibration (intrinsic, extrinsic, hand-eye), object detection, semantic segmentation, 3D reconstruction, visual servoing, or perception pipeline optimization. Trigger whenever the user mentions OpenCV, Open3D, PCL, RealSense, ZED, OAK-D, camera calibration, AprilTags, ArUco markers, stereo vision, RGBD, point cloud filtering, ICP registration, coordinate transforms, camera intrinsics, distortion correction, image undistortion, sensor streaming, frame synchronization, or any computer vision task in a robotics context. Also covers multi-camera rigs, time synchronization across sensors, perception latency budgets, and production deployment of perception pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS cost optimization, monitoring, and operational excellence expert. Use when analyzing AWS bills, estimating costs, setting up CloudWatch alarms, querying logs, auditing CloudTrail activity, or assessing security posture. Essential when user mentions AWS costs, spending, billing, budget, pricing, CloudWatch, observability, monitoring, alerting, CloudTrail, audit, or wants to optimize AWS infrastructure costs and operational efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides structured AWS cost optimization guidance using five pillars (right-sizing, elasticity, pricing models, storage optimization, monitoring) and twelve actionable best practices with executable AWS CLI examples. Use when optimizing AWS costs, reviewing AWS spending, finding unused AWS resources, implementing FinOps practices, reducing EC2/EBS/S3 bills, configuring AWS Budgets, or performing AWS Well-Architected cost reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process and manage construction change orders. Track costs, approvals, and impact on schedule and budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Property development lifecycle in OpenConstructionERP: lead to SPA to handover — feasibility, budgeting from cost bases, sales tracking and construction handover. Use for residential/commercial development projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when querying or calling pay-per-token foundation models, or when creating, updating, listing, or querying Unity Gateway (also called Unity AI Gateway) services, including model provider services, MCP services, system.ai services, and three-part Unity Catalog service names (catalog.schema.service). Also use for managing spend budgets and usage alerts on Unity Gateway, and for migrating from legacy AI Gateway. Also use when a workload with Model Serving endpoint permissions (for example CAN_QUERY) gets PERMISSION_DENIED querying a three-part model name, since serving-endpoint access does not grant access to a Unity Gateway service. Not for configuring legacy AI Gateway on Model Serving endpoints; use databricks-model-serving for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build composable skill modules with hub-and-spoke loading. Use when token budget is tight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits business spreadsheet models (.xlsx, .xlsm, or Google Sheets exported to .xlsx) for structural integrity errors and explains each fix -- budgets, forecasts, pricing models, commission calculators, FP&A packs, ops trackers, not only banking models. A bundled openpyxl script finds hardcoded numbers inside formulas, typed values pasted over formulas, inconsistent formulas across a row or column,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses how ready a business is for AI adoption across six dimensions. Evaluates data maturity, tech stack, team skills, process documentation, budget, and culture. Generates a comprehensive ai-readiness-report.md with scores, gap analysis, and recommended starting points. Aligned with OneWave AI's audit methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding session is burning context fast, output is drowning in noise, the model keeps forgetting earlier decisions, or the user asks to reduce tokens, stop the verbose narration, work in a huge repo, or make a long session survive. Covers what to read, what to summarize, what to write to disk, and when to start fresh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze spending patterns and find savings. 50/30/20 rule, subscription audit, debt payoff strategies, emergency fund roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing marketing, messaging, offers, funnels, or content strategy. Triggers on "audit my marketing", "review my landing page", "improve my funnel", "content strategy review", "messaging review", "offer feedback", "marketing checkup", "why isn't my marketing working", "audit my brand". Works at any budget or company size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define a real ICP and the developer personas in the sale. Use when the user says the product is "for developers," can't name who would say no, or is marketing to whoever holds the budget instead of who actually adopts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of gap analysis findings into phased implementation plans with milestones and risk-based prioritisation. Activate when building compliance programmes or allocating privacy budgets. Keywords: remediation roadmap, implementation plan, phased approach, prioritisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and safely repair cross-runtime Skill governance: canonical-source ownership, divergent or duplicate projections, exposure scopes and budgets, lifecycle drift, quarantine, and retirement. Use when the user explicitly requests cross-runtime or cross-scope Skill governance; ignore project-local Skill inventory, product/runtime loading or enablement checks, usage statistics, and mentions/traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, diagnose, and verify performance budgets, latency targets, load tests, capacity estimates, bottleneck analysis, caching strategy, query efficiency, queue throughput, and regression gates. Use when a feature may be slow, a system must scale, a performance regression is suspected, or release readiness depends on throughput, cost, memory, CPU, or response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。