本文へ移動
cccskills

「check」の検索結果

8,503 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Curate .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of findings about the configured engine MCP server. Four jobs: re-stamp (the server moved, so every entry is suspect), replay (reproduce a `replay: safe` finding inside a disposable sandbox to see whether it still holds), retire (offer to drop what was fixed or went upstream), and upstream (print a ready diff for the packaged INDEX.md). Use for "audit the MCP notes", "are these findings still true", "recheck the MCP traps", "clean up MCP-RECHECK-NOTES", "the server was updated — revisit the notes". Replaying mutates a live editor, so it starts by telling you how to prepare it — save your scene, open an empty one — and asks once before touching anything. Everything it creates lives under a single UNIKIT_AUDIT_<runid> prefix, is deleted in one action, and the scene is never saved. To record a NEW finding use /unikit-mcp-trap instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NintendaDev/unikit-ai182026年10月14日 更新

pulser

無料

Diagnose and test Claude Code skills against Anthropic's 7 principles. Scans SKILL.md files, checks 8 rules (gotchas, description, allowed-tools, file-size, structure, frontmatter, conflicts, usage-hooks), classifies skill types, generates prescriptions, and runs eval tests. Use when checking skill quality, auditing skills, testing skills, or before publishing skills. Triggers on "스킬 점검", "스킬 진단", "스킬 테스트", "check skills", "audit skills", "test skills", "skill health", "pulser", "pulser eval".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TheStack-ai/pulser182026年6月30日 更新

Check the local environment for Spec Kit by running `specify check` (and `specify version`). USE FOR: verifying required tools are installed, diagnosing a broken spec-kit setup, reporting CLI version/feature capabilities. DO NOT USE FOR: installing or upgrading the CLI itself (use the speckit-self skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/spec-kit-copilot172026年10月6日 更新

One-shot GEO visibility check for a brand using Xpoz. Runs the buyer questions that matter through Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, and reports where the brand appears, who wins instead, and which surfaces the answers are assembled from. Use when asked to "check my AI visibility", "does ChatGPT recommend us", "GEO audit", "where do we show up in AI answers", or "who wins our category in AI answers".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills172026年9月9日 更新

telemetry

無料

Internal utility for the skills library itself — opt-in, local-first, privacy-respecting usage telemetry and update checks. Provides version checking, usage logging, and usage reporting for the skills in this repo. Use only when asked to view skill usage stats, configure telemetry opt-in/out, wire a skill to log its own runs, or check for skill updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os172026年7月17日 更新

Unified verification engine for Python data science projects. Covers environment checks, type checking, linting, tests, security scans, code review with DS anti-patterns, and notebook checks. Commands (/verify, /quality-gate) invoke different subsets of this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp172026年10月1日 更新

This is the MistEye security gate skill. It is triggered by pre-installation risk checks (including Skill/MCP dependency manifests), pre-access security checks for domains or URLs, IoC malicious detection, and supply-chain risk blocking, especially for common requests such as "take a look at this address/website." It must use `https://app-api.misteye.io/functions/v1/detect`; in dependency and external-link scenarios it has the highest priority. If the API returns `status="malicious"` or any `matches`, the action must be blocked and explicitly reported as "blocked". Only after the first installation is complete should the user be reminded that daily patrols can be enabled with OpenClaw or Hermes (default once per day).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

slowmist/MistEye-Skills162026年5月21日 更新

Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanexxxx777/curated-claude-code162026年9月7日 更新

goal

無料

Autonomous goal loop — give it ONE goal plus how to verify it, the agent runs check→fix→check itself and comes back only with the finished result (code with audit, research with fact-check, content with critique, audit/backtest). Self-verification instead of constant supervision, with hard safety guards. Vary the loop with a verification rubric designed before it runs. Triggers — "work autonomously to the result", "don't come back until it's done", "run the loop yourself", "drive it to done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanexxxx777/curated-claude-code162026年9月7日 更新

Verification checklist to prevent fake success. Detects test deletion/disabling, coverage regression, lint bypass, secret exposure. Triggered by "deception", "fake" ("가짜"), "fake success", "verification" ("검증"), "checklist" ("체크리스트"), "deletion detection" ("삭제 탐지"), "regression" keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026年10月13日 更新

lint

無料

Linting and code quality workflow for Software Metrics Machine. Covers ESLint 9.x flat config, Prettier formatting, lint-staged (auto-fix on commit), per-workspace configs, TypeScript strict mode, and all lint commands. USE FOR: lint, eslint, prettier, format, code style, linting, lint fix, auto-fix, check style, code quality, lint-staged, typecheck, type-check, tsc noEmit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests (use tdd skill), building (use build commands), commit hooks setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-Projects-4-Fun/software-metrics-machine152026年10月12日 更新

Produces internal case viability and conflict check memos for personal injury litigation intake. Screens conflicts, assesses liability and damages, checks statute of limitations, and outputs an accept/decline recommendation. Use when evaluating new PI intake, running conflict checks, assessing case merit pre-filing, or preparing acceptance memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis after code modifications. Triggers on: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis. NOT for full build verification (see mk:verify); NOT for test coverage (see mk:testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

design-qa

無料

Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DKeken/codex-skills-alternative152026年6月3日 更新

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Generates comprehensive, context-aware code review checklists tailored to the specific codebase, programming language, and team standards. Analyzes PR diffs and suggests what reviewers should focus on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Passive domain reconnaissance using Python stdlib. Use this skill for subdomain discovery, SSL certificate inspection, WHOIS lookups, DNS records, domain availability checks, and bulk multi-domain analysis. No API keys required. Triggers on requests like "find subdomains", "check ssl cert", "whois lookup", "is this domain available", "bulk check these domains".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kevinnft/ai-agent-skills142026年8月1日 更新

Review code against a standard checklist covering security, correctness, performance, and readability. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, or audit changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davila7/claude-with-skills132026年5月15日 更新

ci-fix

無料

Investigate and fix failing CI. Takes a PR reference, one or more CI run/job URLs, or freeform text describing where the failures are, then enumerates failing workflows/jobs/steps, determines the root cause (often one shared cause behind several red checks), proposes a fix plan, applies code changes, commits, pushes, watches the new runs, and repeats until checks pass. Use when the user says "fix CI", "CI is red", "checks are failing", "the build is broken on my PR", "fix the failing jobs", or pastes a failing CI run URL. Do NOT use for authoring new workflows, or for read-only diagnosis with no fix intent — use gha-log-reader for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

phatblat/dotfiles122026年10月14日 更新

Use when verifying a story or ticket implementation against its spec and acceptance criteria - per-AC verdicts with file:line evidence and proving tests, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, stale docs, comment discipline. Finds the spec from an explicit path, the ticket key in the branch name, or plan files - and asks rather than guessing. For defect-hunting code review use dotnet-techne-code-review instead. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, definition of done, dead code check, reuse check, comment check, verify story, QA this branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Metalnib/dotnet-episteme-skills122026年9月9日 更新

[Utilities] Use when you need to save analysis context to a checkpoint file for recovery (user-facing alias for memory-management Part 1 CHECKPOINT_CREATE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

Use before pushing, force-pushing, marking ready for review, or claiming checks pass on a deepseek-harness branch, and immediately after gh stack sync publishes rewritten branches, to select the smallest tests and checks that cover the outgoing or just-published diff without reflexively running the full repository suite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EthanYoQ/Skill-hub112026年10月5日 更新

Pre-commit i18n check. Scans changed files for untranslated strings, missing locale keys, and locale sync issues. Fast and focused — only checks what changed. Use before committing or as a review add-on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FriendlyInternet/nuxt-crouton102026年10月14日 更新